
Privacy Commissioner says journalists have no exemption under Privacy Ordinance when gathering data
Hong Kong's Privacy Commissioner Ada Chung Lai-ling supports proposed rules tightening access to land records, warning journalists have no exemption under the Privacy Ordinance when collecting data, though public-interest safeguards apply to subsequent publication or broadcast.
AI-generated summary
Hong Kong's privacy watchdog supports a proposed overhaul of rules to tighten access to land records amid complaints over information misuse that appear to be worsening.
Hong Kong’s privacy watchdog has backed a proposed overhaul of rules to tighten access to land records, warning that journalists have no exemption when collecting data as complaints over information misuse appear to be worsening.
Privacy Commissioner Ada Chung Lai-ling said on Friday that journalists do not enjoy an exemption under the Privacy Ordinance when gathering information, even though certain safeguards apply to how the data is subsequently used.
“The Privacy Ordinance does provide an exemption on the use of personal data for journalistic activities, which means journalists do not need the prior consent of the data subject before publishing or broadcasting the relevant data. However, the prerequisite is that the publication or broadcast must be in the public interest,” she told a radio programme.

Macau completed its first national security trial. Pro-democracy leader Ou Kam-xin was convicted of four crimes including "subversion of state power" and imprisoned for 12 years and six months. He is expected to be 82 years old when he is released from prison in 2039. The case is heard in secret and is defended by assigned lawyers. The government supports the court's decision.

Au Kam Sun, a pro-democracy activist in Macau and former member of the Legislative Council, was involved in seven charges. The Criminal Court of the Lower Court ruled that he was not guilty of two counts of "subversion of state power" and was convicted of the remaining charges and sentenced to 12 and a half years in prison. The Mainland Affairs Council expressed its deep regret, criticized the lack of openness and transparency in the trial, which affected judicial human rights and procedural justice, and called on the Macau government to safeguard judicial procedural justice and protect the people's basic rights.

Former Macau lawmaker Au Kam-san, 69, has been convicted on five of seven charges in Macau’s first national security trial and sentenced to 12½ years in prison. The Court of First Instance found him guilty on four national security law counts and one secrecy violation, while acquitting him on two subversion charges.
The 25th Session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People's Congress voted to pass the Anti-Cross-Border Corruption Law on November 6. It consists of 6 chapters and 47 articles, covering mechanisms and responsibilities, case handling and international cooperation, integrity and compliance, legal liability, etc., and will come into effect on the date of promulgation.
A reporter from the "Rule of Law Daily" investigation found that a large number of ADHD self-measurement scales on online platforms have randomly deleted questions and lack reliability and validity, but give labels of light, medium and heavy, causing anxiety; some merchants combine ADHD with paid courses, structured supervision services and toy products for marketing. Experts point out that ADHD diagnosis needs to be completed by professional psychiatrists in regular hospitals, and online self-measurement scales cannot be used as a basis for diagnosis. Related online content, self-measurement scales and market services need to be standardized urgently.
The Supreme People's Procuratorate released a typical case, revealing that Liu, under the guise of a "real estate agency", collected "first-hand landlady" housing information published on the Internet and sold it overseas, making an illegal profit of more than 190,000 yuan. The victim, Ms. Li, was defrauded of more than 290,000 yuan by overseas criminals. The court sentenced Liu to three years and six months in prison and fined him 200,000 yuan for infringing on citizens' personal information. The prosecutor's office reminds that the personal information that has been disclosed is not a "public resource" that can be resold at will.