
A federal magistrate judge in Virginia ruled that Elon Musk engaged in 'state sanctioned intimidation' of former FEMA CFO Mary Comans by posting false accusations on X in February 2025, clearing her name and condemning the coordinated effort to damage her reputation while he served as head of DOGE in the Trump administration.
AI-generated summary
Elon Musk, as head of DOGE in the Trump administration, posted false claims on X in February 2025 accusing Mary Comans, then FEMA CFO, of criminal activity and illegally funneling $58 million to migrant hotels in Manhattan. The Department of Homeland Security fired Comans and three colleagues the next day, labeling them 'deep state activists.'
A federal magistrate judge in Virginia ruled that Elon Musk engaged in "state sanctioned intimidation" of ex-FEMA CFO Mary Comans when he posted falsehoods on X last year accusing her of "criminal action" and of "funneling $58 million to illegal migrant hotels in Manhattan.
Musk, the world's richest person, was working for the Trump administration as the head of DOGE when he shared those posts on Feb. 11, 2025. The Department of Homeland Security said the next day it was firing Comans and three colleagues, and labeled them "deep state activists."
In Tuesday's order, U.S. Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick cleared Comans' name.
Comans served as FEMA CFO from around January 2018 until February 2025, and was also FEMA's operating chief from 2020 to 2021.
Fitzpatrick wrote in the order that, "The facts establish that high-ranking government officials," including Musk, then a special government employee, had "engaged in a coordinated public relations campaign to impugn the personal and professional integrity of Ms. Comans."
"Mr. Musk was the head of DOGE, he knew or should have known that any payments made to state or local governments through a FEMA grant in February 2025 were approved by his subordinates," the judge wrote.
He added that Musk posted a picture of Ms. Comans "to his millions of followers while falsely characterizing her government service as a 'criminal action,'" an act Fitzpatrick described as "little more than state sanctioned intimidation."
CNBC has reached out to Musk and White House attorneys involved in the case for comment.
Democracy Defenders Fund, which was involved in Comans' case, said in a statement that it was pleased with the decision.
"Mary Comans served in the federal government for 21 years," said Craig Becker, the group's head of affirmative litigation. "Career public servants are people, not pawns, and no one who has devoted their life to serving the American public should have their good name destroyed for partisan, political gain."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Mary Comans or the Democracy Defenders Fund will pursue a defamation lawsuit against Elon Musk
Likely · Within months
Congressional hearings will be held regarding the use of DOGE to target federal employees for political reasons
Possible · Within months
The Supreme Court directed Delhi Police to depute a senior officer to respond to allegations of sexual harassment of women journalists during the Oct 10 protest, while also hearing petitions on contempt of court, police excesses, and political activity inside court premises.
The Supreme Court Bar Association decided to file a contempt petition against Kerala Congress for a deleted social media post asking CJI Surya Kant to quit, while Mamata TMC MP Mahua Moitra's sarcastic misspelling of the CJI's name drew condemnation from SCBA, SCAORA, and SC Women Lawyers Association.

The BBC has asked the court to force President Trump to appear in a recorded testimony in a $10 billion damages lawsuit filed against him. President Trump announced his absence due to pending national affairs, and is scheduled to discuss whether to compel the recording of testimony at the federal district court in Florida on the 22nd.

A federal court in Boston began hearing the case of Eric Nshimiye, a 55-year-old Rwandan-American US citizen accused of participating in and covering up his role in the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Prosecutors allege he lied to DHS agents and committed perjury in a 2019 trial, while the defense claims the case relies on unreliable eyewitness testimony decades after the events.

NEW Party Diyarbakır Deputy Sezgin Tanrıkulu made a statement about the rejection of the retrial and release request submitted by Osman Kavala's lawyers to the Istanbul 13th High Criminal Court. Tanrıkulu stated that the decision was against the law, the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights and criticized Kavala's nearly nine-year detention.

Antalya 1st Civil Court of First Instance decided to notify the petitions of appeal submitted by the plaintiffs' attorneys on 23/09/2026 and 02/10/2026 due to the fact that the identities and addresses of the defendants were not reported in the petition dated 10/08/2016 and no results were obtained in the address search.