
Court decision determines return of pieces linked to diversity and peace processes within 48 hours
AI-generated summary
The government of Abelardo de la Espriella removed around 30 pieces from the National Museum of Colombia, claiming to avoid political indoctrination. The action sparked protests and a legal battle over censorship and curatorial criteria.
A judge in Bogotá ordered, on Wednesday night (28), that the government of President Abelardo de la Espriella return, within 48 hours, all works removed from the National Museum of Colombia. The decision is a setback for the offensive by the ultra-right leader, who had ordered the removal of around 30 pieces linked to sexual diversity, feminism and peace processes from the cultural institution.
There is an appeal. When justifying the withdrawal, the government argued that the museum should not "serve as an instrument of political indoctrination". The measure provoked protests, and criticism was not limited to the left and the cultural class.
According to the ruling, the items were removed “without proven curatorial justification”. The decision states that the measure "disregarded the constitutional protection of cultural expressions and unjustifiably restricted the right of the plaintiffs to know and appreciate them."
The action was presented to the Court by cultural groups and opposition politicians, who classified the government's decision as censorship. According to the lawsuit, the removal of the works "violates the right to equality and the prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity."
The court had already imposed measures to protect the pieces removed while the case was analyzed. The recent ruling, in turn, does not require the permanent exhibition of the works or prevent changes to the exhibitions. The objective, according to the text, is to ensure that decisions about the collection comply with technical criteria, and not exclusively due to the authorities' disagreement with the ideas or events represented.
One of the authors of the case, deputy Gabriel Becerra, stated that the decision represents "a victory for the victims, diversity, peace and historical memory." "No government owns our history," he wrote in a post on X.
Without directly mentioning the museum, Espriella stated a few days ago that the "State has a moral duty" to "prevent cultural spaces from being captured by atheist social-communism and the enemy of values."
The removal of the pieces transformed the museum, the oldest in the country and one of the main spaces of Colombian historical memory, into a stage for political dispute. Espriella took office in August, with a hard-line speech, promises to combat organized crime and defend conservative ideals.
Espriella's offensive is part of a trend of ultraliberal and conservative governments that promote an idea of cultural war against the left and seek to review the way museums and public institutions present episodes of national history.
In the United States, Donald Trump has led a dispute with the Smithsonian Institute, which manages institutions such as the National Museum of American History and the National Museum of African American History and Culture. In Argentina, Javier Milei promoted dismissals in human rights bodies under the accusation that they had been appropriated by the left.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Government must file an appeal against the court decision.
Likely · Within days

The federal government appealed a court decision ordering the PRF to reestablish human rights commissions and include specific disciplines in police training. The AGU alleges undue interference by the Judiciary in public policies.
The Special Court of the STJ unanimously denied an appeal by Robinho's defense to take to the STF the validation of his conviction for rape in Italy. The former player, imprisoned in Limeira, has already received 301 days of sentence remission for studies, reading and work.

Actor Russell Brand gave evidence at Southwark Crown Court in London denying allegations of rape and sexual assault involving six women between 1999 and 2009. He described the impact of the allegations as devastating.
The Federal Supreme Court (STF) clarified that there is no court order issued to carry out searches and seizures at addresses associated with Flávio, the target of investigations in inquiries conducted by the Court.

The São Paulo Court of Justice unanimously denied a new request for habeas corpus from Deolane Bezerra's defense. The lawyer and influencer is accused of being part of a criminal organization and money laundering. The defense will appeal to the STJ.
The Federal Supreme Court (STF) clarified that there is no current court order to carry out searches and seizures at addresses linked to Flávio, the target of ongoing investigations at the Court.