
The federal government is investing 2.5 billion euros in a measure that brings little relief and fails to meet ecological goals.
AI-generated summary
The fuel discount was introduced to reduce fuel prices by reducing taxes. The measure cost the federal government 2.5 billion euros.
Hope was high. The “tank discount” was intended to make life cheaper for drivers. Fuel prices should hopefully fall below the psychologically important mark of two euros. The oil companies promised to pass on the tax cut that has been in effect since October 1st in full. The economy also had hope - for lower inflation, a better mood among people to buy - all thanks to the "fuel discount".
But the reality is different. Although fuel prices have fallen, they are still high - in some cases well over two euros per liter. Although the tax cut will be passed on almost entirely for petrol, it will not be passed on for diesel. Positive effects on inflation rate and shopping mood - none.
With the fuel discount, the federal government is throwing 2.5 billion euros out the window. The fossil fuel lobby, which has been thwarting consistent climate protection for decades, benefits from the billions in taxes. And of course the oil countries also benefit, whose war is responsible for the high energy costs in this country.
There would have been other ideas
Economic experts, the opposition and even members of the government have warned against this. The money could have been used to do so much better things: targeted measures. For example, expanding e-car funding for people with little money, reducing the currently discussed electricity tax for everyone in order to increase the incentive for electricity-based, climate-friendly technologies or ensuring more buses and trains - especially in rural areas.
There are many other ideas about how the money could have been used to help Germany take a step forward. Away from oil, which is making people's lives more and more expensive, whether with or without a discount.
A calming pill before the elections
Instead, it was important to the federal government to quickly put a calming pill in the tanks of angry drivers before the elections in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Berlin - in the hope that the election results would not be so bad for the governing parties.
What remains after a month of "fuel discount" is a lot of frustration - still at the gas station and among all those who want a sustainable, forward-looking policy. But what also remains is the hope that the federal government will learn from its mistakes this time.

Ursula von der Leyen's move to integrate Canada into the EU as an associated member is meeting with resistance from EU member states. Despite a positive response to the idea of a closer partnership, countries like Germany blocked the official name request.

Metro's Russian subsidiary transferred a billion rubles to a military supplies fund run by Putin. The German parent company denies control, but reports suggest the receivership was an arranged deal.
The political conflict in Brazil is escalating due to investigations against the Bolsonaro family. Critics accuse the Lula government of using the judiciary as an instrument to secure power and persecute political opponents.

The US aid organization Hera and many other non-profits suffer from complex bureaucratic and political hurdles when it comes to cross-border donations. Experts call for reforms for a true internal market for philanthropy.

Real Madrid striker Kylian Mbappé comes under pressure in China after making a joke about Mao Zedong. The result is the loss of sponsors and reduced media presence.

The future of the pension without deductions after 45 years of contributions is uncertain. While the new Labor Minister Alexander Schweitzer previously advocated preservation, the Union is now proposing stricter crediting rules in order to reform pension practice.