
State authorities accuse the company of hiding data about the harm of products to women's health.
AI-generated summary
A 2022 National Institutes of Health study found a twofold increase in the risk of uterine cancer in women who frequently used hair straightening products.
The American state of Arizona has filed a lawsuit against the French cosmetics company L'Oréal for possibly concealing data on the development of ovarian and uterine cancer in women because of its chemical hair straightening product, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit was filed in state court late Thursday, making Arizona the first state to sue the company over the hair straightener's cancer risk, the agency said. We are talking about chemical straightening products with the names Dark, Lovely, Optimum.
"The lawsuit accuses L'Oréal of violating state consumer protection laws by selling these products - used predominantly by African-American women - without warning consumers about the possible risks of ovarian and uterine cancer," the agency said in a statement.
According to the agency, Arizona authorities are seeking fines and damages and an injunction requiring the company to stop selling the products unless they carry a cancer warning.
"The state's lawsuit alleges that L'Oréal and others associated with it 'exploited centuries-old... discriminatory beauty standards affecting people of African descent, putting profit before consumer safety,'" Reuters noted.
The agency recalls that more than 12 thousand similar claims from women have already been brought against the company. The cases were consolidated in federal court in Chicago under a "multi-district litigation" process.
As Reuters points out, the first lawsuits were filed after the publication in 2022 of a National Institutes of Health study that found that women who used these products several times a year more than doubled their risk of developing uterine cancer.

The parents filed a lawsuit in the Petrogradsky District Court of St. Petersburg against the owner of the computer game, claiming that their 15-year-old son transferred 445,000 rubles from his father’s account to the account of Blackhub Games LLC from May 17 to May 21, 2025 to participate in a game similar to GTA about Russia. The court refused to satisfy the demands to declare the transaction invalid.

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation overturned the decisions of lower authorities in the case of changing a child’s surname without the consent of the father. The court ruled that it is necessary to take into account the interests of the minor and involve the guardianship authorities to assess the situation if the father evades parenting.

The Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs listed cases when drivers must necessarily replace their driver’s license. The list included expiration, change of personal data, loss, wear and tear, and new medical indications.

Independently making entries in a Russian passport automatically makes the document invalid, said State Duma deputy Georgy Kamnev. He recalled mandatory and voluntary marks, as well as changes to the rules for entering the TIN.

The Supreme Court of Russia rejected the cassation appeal of the Prosecutor General's Office, confirming the legality of the acquittal based on the jury's verdict. The court ruled that the defense's actions did not constitute unlawful influence on the panel.

Third countries have begun to more often detain and extradite Russian citizens who are wanted. Lawyer Violetta Volkova reported this, noting the existence of such cases in Europe and other countries.