
AI-generated summary
The debate on the wearing of the Islamic veil in France takes place in a context of tensions around secularism, integration and religious visibility. Since 2004, conspicuous religious symbols have been banned in schools, and in 2010, hiding the face in public spaces was prohibited for security reasons. The RN is now proposing to extend this ban to the Islamic veil via referendum.
It is a garment that is regularly the subject of heated debate. The National Rally confirmed, Monday August 31, that the ban in public spaces on the wearing of the Islamic veil (or "hijab"), a scarf which leaves the face visible, would be submitted to the French by referendum in the event of Marine Le Pen's victory in the 2027 presidential election. Objective: "to fight against Islamist ideology", justified Jordan Bardella, the president of the far-right party.
Also read
âWe consider that radical Islam represents a threat in our country, which is still relevant,â detailed MP SĂ©bastien Chenu on BFMTV. âFrom the moment we want to fight against an ideology, we must define it, define its mode of expression, its representations, its financing, its relays, to ban it,â continued the elected RN of the North. He believes that wearing the veil, "imposed" or "chosen", is "obviously (...) a symbol of radical Islam".
The proposal, the feasibility of which raises questions without constitutional change, is far from being new for Marine Le Pen, who had been in favor of it since her first presidential campaign in 2012. According to a survey carried out at the beginning of September for CNews, Europe 1 and Le Journal du Dimanche, three media outlets belonging to conservative billionaire Vincent BollorĂ©, 60% of those questioned support the ban on the veil in public spaces â mainly seniors and supporters of the right and far-right. This is less than in November, when the measure received 69% favorable opinions (PDF).
Secularism at the heart of the legislation
âWith the exception of Turkey at the time of Mustafa Kemal, France already has, among democracies, the most restrictive legislation in the worldâ on the wearing of religious clothing, recalls the jurist Nicolas CadĂšne. At the origin of this approach: respect for secularism. Enshrined in the law of separation of Churches and State of 1905, this principle translates into respect for the religious freedom of citizens on the one hand, and the neutrality of the State, public services and its agents in religious matters on the other, details the government website on the subject.
Since 2004, religious symbols visible at school, including headscarves, have been banned in the name of this principle. In 2023, the abaya (a long dress worn over clothing) was also kicked out of classes for the same reason. Athletes representing France at the 2024 Olympic Games have also been banned from wearing headscarves under this principle. In 2010, the law also prohibited the concealment of the face in public spaces, including the wearing of the full veil. Unlike the previous ones, this text is not based on secularism but on public security and respect for the âminimum requirements of life in societyâ.
Restrictions in other countries
Is our country the only one to take such measures? In recent years, several of our European neighbors have in turn banned the full veil from public spaces, such as Belgium, Austria, Denmark, Switzerland and Portugal. In Austria, wearing a headscarf is also prohibited for students under the age of 14, according to Euronews. In Belgium, East Flanders has banned clothing from its schools, for both students and staff, reports the newspaper DH. Local restrictions on the wearing of the veil also exist in Spain and Italy, particularly in schools. In Germany, several regions also banned the wearing of the veil for teachers, before their decisions were overturned by the Constitutional Court, notes Le Monde.
âMore and more of our neighbors are also leading a policy of regulating signs of the visibility of Islam, in particular full veiling,â summarizes political scientist Franck FrĂ©gosi, author of Governing Islam in France. "None of them went as far as a general ban on the 'hijab'", which "would undermine religious freedom" protected in France and in Europe, he notes. The discussion launched by the National Rally's proposal therefore remains, according to him, "a very Franco-French debate". The only exception: in Sweden, a country historically accommodating towards religious minorities, the far right has also proposed, since 2019, a ban on the "hijab" in public spaces, reports Le Monde.
Elsewhere in Europe, several far-right parties are nevertheless âcarrying out measures to increasingly limit the visibility of the Muslim presenceâ. In Germany, Alternative fĂŒr Deutschland (AfD) therefore proposes going beyond existing legislation by banning the "hijab" in schools. In Austria, the FPĂ wants to extend the ban on the veil for students to teachers and students, according to France 24.
An increasingly visible practice
These reflections are less and less those of the extreme right alone, notes the researcher. In France, in particular, the former Macronist Prime Minister Gabriel Attal led the fight for the ban on the abaya at school, while the former Minister of Education Jean-Michel Blanquer considered that "the veil was not desirable" in France. The former socialist Prime Minister, Manuel Valls, also displays in Marianne his desire to legislate to prohibit "the veil imposed on young girls in public spaces", seeing it as "a provocation" contrary to secularism.
How to explain this French obsession? In our country, which is home to one of the largest Muslim communities in Western Europe, the veil remains a minority practice, but one that is increasingly visible. Around 10% of the population declared themselves Muslim in 2020, according to INSEE. Among these Muslim believers, 26% of women aged 18 to 49 claimed to wear the veil, according to the statistical institute. They were only 18% to do so in 2009. In a country "among the most secularized in the world", this visibility is perceived as "a sensitive subject", estimates Nicolas CadĂšne.
The lawyer also points out the absence of socio-cultural diversity, "similar populations living in the same places and grouping together into communities of belonging". âThe problem is that ignorance of others feeds preconceptions, fears, clichĂ©s,â continues the former general rapporteur of the Observatory of Secularism. As such, he believes that the ban on wearing the veil constitutes "a convenient tool" to hide a racist opinion behind a more noble motive, such as "secularism or the fight against religious extremism". Conversely, the promoters of the measure deny targeting a religious minority. âWe have never stigmatized women who wear the veil,â assures Jean-Philippe Tanguy.
To explain the recurrence of the debate on the Islamic veil, Nicolas CadĂšne also cites the "lack of religious culture" of the French population and its political leaders. âIf the first veiling initiatives in France, in the 1990s, were supported by a certain number of associations close to the Muslim Brotherhood, today women also wear the veil in reference to their own understanding of religion,â underlines Franck FrĂ©gosi. There are, in Muslim texts, "a certain number of prescriptions relating to modesty for men and women, of which the veil is one", although this rule is not one of the "five pillars of Islam", recalls the specialist.
âWe must not confuse what can be a matter of the free choice of wearing clothing, which refers to religious instructions, and a form of visibility of an Islamist plot, of subversion from within.â
Franck Frégosi, political scientist
at franceinfo
AI outlook â possibilities, not facts
The National Rally will organize a referendum on the ban on the Islamic veil if it wins the 2027 presidential election.
Possible · Within years

Michel-Edouard Leclerc, president of the E.Leclerc strategic committee and influential media figure, officially announced his non-candidacy for the 2027 presidential election during the 8 p.m. news on France 2 on August 31, putting an end to months of speculation fueled by polls placing him at the top of the 'alternative' personalities.

The HATVP indicates that the president of RTE, a former collaborator of the ĂlysĂ©e, is prohibited from entering into contact with SĂ©bastien Lecornu and Laurent Bregeon, following a request for an opinion from the ĂlysĂ©e on her transfer to RTE, a subsidiary of EDF.

Maud Bregeon, government spokesperson, believes that the competition between Ădouard Philippe and Gabriel Attal is over and that the time for the primary is over, while Sarah Knafo, nationalist MEP, does not close the door to entry into a government led by Jordan Bardella, remaining faithful to the union of the rights defended by Ăric Zemmour.

Marine Tondelier, national secretary of the Ecologists and candidate in the presidential election of April 18 and May 2, 2027, is due to give birth at the end of September, which constitutes an unprecedented situation under the Fifth Republic. She must lead the campaign and pregnancy at the same time, preserving her health and managing her stress thanks to prenatal yoga and a mental preparation coach.

This Sunday evening, the German and international press meets in Magdeburg to follow the results of the regional election in Saxony-Anhalt, where the AfD is given the winner with more than 40% of the votes according to the polls, ahead of the CDU at 23% and Die Linke at 11.5%, while the Greens and the FDP are struggling to reach the threshold of 5% necessary for their entry into the regional parliament.
Less than two months before the mid-term elections of November 3, 2026, postal voting in the United States is at the heart of a legal battle concerning a decree from Donald Trump aimed at restricting this method of voting, with a suspension of the rules extended until the day of the election by a magistrate, while electoral officials fear disruptions in the distribution of ballots.