
The British Green Party has adopted a motion calling Zionism a form of racism, advocating a single Palestinian state across all of historic Palestine, including Jerusalem as its capital and the right of return.
AI-generated summary
Britain's Green Party has passed a motion redefining Zionism as a form of racism and calling for a single Palestinian state.
British environmentalists have chosen a very unique way to mark the third anniversary of the October 7 massacres. The Green Party of Zack Polanski, one of whose deputies happily chants “Allah akbar” on the evening of his election, will stop at nothing to seduce a population more permeable than the average to anti-Semitic prejudices, such as broadcasting its electoral propaganda in Urdu: a sign of the times, the language of Shakespeare has been stripped of its rank in certain constituencies.
Thus the party has just adopted a motion which equates Zionism, or the right of Jews to have a state, to a form of racism. To this, he prefers a “single democratic Palestinian state” throughout historic Palestine, with Jerusalem as its capital and a right of return for Palestinians and their descendants. Given the rich democratic tradition of the Muslim world and its proverbial respect for minorities, it would have been simpler to call for...

The Prime Minister suggests a suspension of classes "for a time of internal democracy" in order to calm a degraded school situation marked by violence, Islamist and anti-Semitic provocations, and attacks against students and staff, making any debate on structural problems difficult.

Episodes of urban violence involving young people recall the destructive enjoyment of some of Generation Z, according to specialists.

Three intellectuals speak in columns: Baptiste Detombe analyzes the metamorphosis of friendly and romantic ties in the digital age, Omar Youssef Souleimane accuses La France insoumise of exploiting racism during high school blockades, and Pierre-Henri Tavoillot sees in these blockages an illegality that has become the norm and a dull anger of youth instrumentalized for the benefit of chaos.

Le Figaro publishes two columns: Bruno Alomar criticizes the excess of industrial standards in the EU, while Maxime Sbaihi denounces the generational inequity of the French retirement system, pleading for the removal of the tax relief for retirees.

Jean F., a former bachelor with a passion for auctions and flea markets, has changed his habits since his marriage and the upcoming arrival of a child. He now monitors his expenses via an Excel table for fear of not being able to pass on enough to his future children, illustrating a tendency among certain young French people to invest early to secure their financial future.

In a column, Renaud Girard criticizes France's financial situation compared to its European neighbors and calls for the inclusion of budgetary golden rules in the Constitution. In a column, Agnès Verdier-Molinié opposes the increases in inheritance taxes on high wealth defended by the left, believing that they would send a harmful message discouraging entrepreneurship in France.