
The Constitutional Court decided that freedom of expression was violated in the absence of a legal basis for the disciplinary punishment and sent the file to Ankara 14th Administrative Court for retrial.
AI-generated summary
Karatay was given a temporary ban from profession for one month, and the High Honorary Board of the Turkish Medical Association approved this punishment. When the lawsuits filed for the annulment of the sentence were rejected, an application was made to the Constitutional Court. In a separate incident, musician Sinan Diler, who was injured in a gunfight between two people at a restaurant in Büyükçekmece, Istanbul, on October 27, 2013, had made several complaints to identify the attacker. The investigation was initiated in 2017, the lawsuit was filed in 2024, and the trial was concluded on May 20, 2026.
Karatay was given a temporary ban from profession for one month. The Turkish Medical Association High Honor Board also approved the punishment. Karatay applied to the Constitutional Court (AYM) when his lawsuits for the annulment of the sentence were rejected.
'NO LEGAL BASIS'
The Constitutional Court pointed out that the acts corresponding to disciplinary penalties should be clearly and predictably regulated in the law. It was emphasized that the law used as the basis for the punishment did not provide sufficient legal guarantee to prevent arbitrary practices. Stating that this regulation was found to be unconstitutional and annulled in 2025, the Constitutional Court decided that the penalty given to Karatay did not meet the requirement of legality. The decision briefly stated as follows:
"Since there is no clear regulation regarding which disciplinary penalty will be applied to which action in Article 39 of Law No. 6023, it has been observed that the legal basis of the disciplinary penalty applied to the applicant does not meet the requirement of certainty. Therefore, it has been concluded that the intervention does not meet the condition of legality. For the reasons explained, it must be decided that the freedom of expression guaranteed in Article 26 of the Constitution has been violated."
The Constitutional Court ruled that the one-month 'disqualification from profession' penalty was a 'violation of freedom of expression'. The Constitutional Court sent a copy of the decision to the Ankara 14th Administrative Court for a retrial to eliminate the consequences of the violation of freedom of expression.
COMPENSATION DECISION AFTER 13 YEARS
Musician Sinan Diler, who was injured in a gunfight between two people at a restaurant in Büyükçekmece, Istanbul, on October 27, 2013, made several complaints to identify the person who shot him. However, during the initial investigation, no information was found regarding the security camera recordings of the incident being examined. The investigation was only launched in 2017. A lawsuit could be filed against the suspect in 2024, and the trial was concluded on May 20, 2026. The defendant was sentenced to 3 years and 4 months in prison for possible intentional injury. The Constitutional Court (AYM) ruled that the 13-year trial process was a violation of rights. The Constitutional Court unanimously decided to pay Diler 200 thousand TL non-pecuniary damages and 40 thousand 487 lira and 60 kuruş trial expenses. The request for financial compensation was rejected.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Ankara 14th Administrative Court will re-try the sentence given to Karatay in line with the decision of the Constitutional Court and may annul it.
Very likely · Within weeks

Ela Rümeysa Cebeci and Steven Sadettin Saran, who were sued by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office for drug or stimulant trafficking, were acquitted by the Istanbul 4th High Criminal Court on the grounds that the elements of the crime were not present. In his defense, Cebeci denied the accusations and answered the message and photo questions about Cem Yılmaz.

Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court heard the secret witness Gürgen in the case where 436 defendants were tried in Silivri. The witness stated that Ali İhsan Mengir's companies received approximately 104 million TL of work from Ağaç A.Ş. in 2024 and that he could not remember that 15 million TL was paid for the construction in Ümraniye.

The Supreme Court of England sent a witness summons to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor in the case filed against Nebahat İşbilen, alleging that she was defrauded by her former financial advisor Selman Türk. İşbilen says that Türk transferred 750 thousand pounds to Andrew under the pretext of helping with passport procedures. Andrew will appear before the judge on December 15. Andrew, who lost all his titles due to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal in 2019, also came to the fore as the first senior royal member to be detained for the first time since 1647.

A prison sentence between 5 years 2 months and 14 years 10 months was requested for two journalists due to the statements made about Bolat in the program broadcast on Sözcü TV on October 7. Ağırel said that the source of the allegations was the NEW Party and conveyed it as an allegation; Saymaz stated that he only asked Ağırel a question.

Emir Sarıgül, who was arrested on October 21, was released with a judicial control measure in the form of house arrest. In the investigation carried out by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, 28 people, including Murat Ağırel, his ex-wife Aylin Kotil, his sons Ömer Sarıgül and Emir Sarıgül, and businessman Sofu Altınbaş, were arrested.

Şile Mayor Özgür Kabadayı, in his 5-hour defense rejecting the allegations of bribery and profit processing, stated that the files were applied in the last months of 2024 and that he did not have the sole signature authority. Speaking about the meeting of 26 CHP mayors and Hasan Tozkoparan's demands, Kabadayı stated that he did not pay any money. The prosecutor requested the continued detention of 12 detained defendants.