
A US judge ordered Meta to pay $25 billion to New Mexico after a jury found Facebook deceived users over privacy and content moderation.
Meta was ordered by a US judge to pay $25 billion to New Mexico after a jury found Facebook deceived users regarding privacy and content moderation following a lawsuit that rejected a nationwide settlement.
AI-generated summary
The case stems from the 2016 Cambridge Analytica scandal and New Mexico's refusal to join a multi-state settlement with Meta.
US tech giant Meta, owner of Facebook, was ordered to pay $25 billion (around €22.5 billion) to the US state of New Mexico after a jury found Facebook deceived its users over privacy and content moderation.
"Facebook promised users that they (the users) controlled their data. This was false," Judge Francis Mathew wrote in his order following the Wednesday verdict.
The case links back to the 2016 Cambridge Analytica scandal, when a third-party quiz harvested the data of some 87 million Facebook profiles and sold it to the UK-based political consulting firm. The firm used the data for targeted ads, including campaign ads for Donald Trump's first presidential run.
Nearly all US states agreed to settle with Facebook over a myriad of legal issues for an overall payment of $18 billion in August. This included releasing the company from future liability for the Cambridge Analytica breach.
New Mexico refused to settle and filed a lawsuit against the platform. Prosecutors claimed that the social network deceived the state's entire population of some 2.1 million people by its public statements on privacy. The US state also argued that Facebook allowed the spread of misinformation and violent content.
In turn, the company's lawyers said the state failed to prove people were actually harmed by Facebook's statements, and claimed the platform had robust content moderation.
In September, a jury found Facebook liable for over 43 million violations of New Mexico consumer protection laws. Meta pledged to "continue to defend ourselves against efforts to distort our record."
Following the jury's decision last month, it was up to the court to determine how much Meta would pay the state. While the $25 billion fine is lower than the $35 billion to $40 billion demanded by the New Mexico prosecutors, it far exceeds the cap of $3.45 billion suggested by Meta's lawyers.
"This court should speak to Meta in the only language it understands, which is money, and the value of its stock price," New Mexico attorney Randi McGinn said during the trial.
On Wednesday, New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez said the outcome should be "an unambiguous message" to Silicon Valley.
While noting that the money will likely be tied up due to appeals, Torrez also noted that the fine is legally due to be paid into New Mexico's education fund.
"We may have paid for the construction of schools for the next 100 years," he said.
The case is the latest in the string of legal challenges large social media companies face in the US and other parts of the world, including the separate August verdict in New Mexico ordering Facebook to pay $567 million over harm to children.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Meta will appeal the $25 billion court ruling.
Very likely · Within months

Australian law firm MinterEllison filed a class action against Meta in the Federal Court, seeking compensation for users affected by Facebook and Instagram design, amid broader government crackdowns on youth social media access.

A New Mexico judge ordered Meta Platforms to pay $25bn after finding the company intentionally misled consumers regarding data privacy following a lawsuit filed by state Attorney General Raul Torrez.

A Hesse state court ruled that Google violated a Frankfurt man's privacy by publishing aerial images of his property on Google Earth and Maps without consent, rejecting freedom of information justifications.

Elon Musk and his America PAC have reached a settlement in two class-action lawsuits alleging fraud regarding a $1 million daily giveaway to voters in swing states during the 2024 US election cycle. The terms of the agreement remain undisclosed.

Russell Brand, 51, is on trial at Southwark Crown Court facing three counts of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault against six women between 1999 and 2009. Prosecutor Riel Karmy-Jones KC described him as a 'ruthless, calculated and manipulative predator' with an 'indiscriminate and voracious' desire for sexual contact. Two complainants have testified so far, describing feeling like a 'zombie' and encountering a 'wild-eyed maniac'. Brand denies all charges, claims some accounts were influenced by a 2023 documentary, and maintains his innocence while attending court with his wife and drawing on his Christian faith for comfort.

A New Mexico state judge dismissed child sexual abuse charges against actor Timothy Busfield, citing prosecutorial misconduct in grand jury proceedings, while noting new charges could be pursued; Busfield denied allegations of improperly touching twin boys on the set of The Cleaning Lady.