
After massive criticism from media organizations worldwide, Meta backs off and pauses the new terms that would allow AI training on newspaper content.
AI-generated summary
Meta has been criticized globally for wanting to scrape newspaper content for AI training through new user agreements.
Last week, DN reported that Meta is rolling back the introduction of the new and heavily criticized user agreements indefinitely, after first pushing them forward from October 30 to November 20. The background is that media organizations worldwide have gone to the roof over the conditions that they believe mean that the tech giant can freely "scrape" information from, for example, newspaper sites to train its own AI.
In Sweden, organizations such as Tidningsutgivarna (TU) have turned to the Swedish Competition Authority for help. In Norway and Brazil, Meta has been stopped by courts, and in the United States, senators from both parties have written to Mark Zuckerberg demanding that the conditions be withdrawn.
Now Meta has backtracked, again, and thus completely removed the terms of use from the site.
Instead, they have published an update in their Business help center, which Nieman Lab was the first to report, where they wrote that the updates are paused.
"We continue to consult with affected parties and will provide additional information when we have more to share. Until then, our current terms and conditions apply," writes Meta.
Thomas Mattsson, vice chairman of Utgivarna, tells DN that Meta has not yet taken any initiatives for dialogue with the Swedish newspaper organisations. At the same time, he views the development positively.
- Meta must now confirm that the criticized conditions will not be proposed again, he says.
This probably means that Swedish media do not need to close their accounts on Facebook and Instagram before November 20, Thomas Mattsson continues.
- The war is not won, but a big and important battle has been won. Meta is no longer threatening to impose the terms on November 20. But Meta's intention remains, they wanted to be able to take all content including archives without compensation and Meta's need for that data in its ambition to develop new AI services in competition with Google, Perplexity, Open AI and others remains, he says.
DN is looking for Meta.

After the Democrats' success in the mid-term elections, Congress is expected to be able to push through a 'shield law' to protect journalists' sources and increase scrutiny of the FCC under Brendan Carr.

After congressman Andy Harris threatened a journalism student, the debate about freedom of the press and threats to journalists in the United States has intensified. Journalists and experts discuss how the political climate and ownership changes affect news reporting.

A year after journalists were barred from the Pentagon, reporters are testifying about tougher working conditions, reduced transparency and a widespread fear among sources of reprisals, affecting the ability to scrutinize the US military.
SVT has mapped a disinformation campaign on Tiktok where AI-generated videos and images are used to call for protests in Järva. Similar campaigns have previously been detected in Spain, but the sender behind the accounts remains unknown.

Several Swedish newspapers, including SvD, GP, Sydsvenskan, DN and Expressen, are speaking out about their policies around AI use after an essay by Emma Engdahl was depublished due to suspected AI writing.

Swedish media organizations such as Utgivarna and Tidningsudgivarna protest against Meta's new terms of use. They fear that Meta will take the right to use journalistic content to train AI and improve its products without compensation.