
After the midterm elections, Congress is expected to be able to limit Trump's influence over the media and authorities such as the FCC.
After the Democrats' success in the mid-term elections, Congress is expected to be able to push through a 'shield law' to protect journalists' sources and increase scrutiny of the FCC under Brendan Carr.
AI-generated summary
The House of Representatives passed a 'shield law' in 2024, but the Senate blocked the proposal. Under Trump, the FCC has been accused of politically motivated decisions.
After the successful mid-term elections for the Democrats, parts of media policy in the US are now expected to go in a different direction. For example, Congress can get through the previously noticed so-called "shield law", which is supposed to protect journalists from being forced to reveal their confidential sources - something that has been a talking point under Donald Trump.
The House of Representatives passed the proposal back in 2024, with support from both Democrats and Republicans, but the Senate did not act.
If the law becomes a reality, it would prevent federal agencies and courts from forcing reporters to identify sources, or release sensitive work material, except in a few limited situations.
It is clear that during his time in power, Donald Trump has on several occasions launched frontal attacks against the media and freedom of the press in the country. The president has called reporters fat and incompetent. He has kicked media outlets like CNN and Politico out of the White House, sued The New York Times and other giants, cut public service funding, and branded reporting he doesn't like as illegal or false.
The election result means that senators and members of the House of Representatives can make a difference by opposing Trump's various attacks on the press, which of course will not stop because of this.
Even the American media and telecom authority FCC may be subjected to significantly tougher scrutiny. Among other things, members of Congress can call for public hearings of officials and managers, as well as appoint investigations into the authority's actions - for example, whether the FCC's decisions were politically motivated.
That last one is particularly interesting. As recently as October, Bloomberg reported on the dissatisfaction with how FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has used his powers under Trump. This applies, for example, to how the authority has investigated radio and television companies and approved mergers such as the giant deal between Paramount/Skydance, where the Ellison family of owners has documented close connections to the president.
Brendan Carr's actions against talk show host Jimmy Kimmel is another notable example. After a controversial joke about Charlie Kirk's suspected killer, the FCC chairman went on a podcast and threatened action against Disney-owned ABC if the program was not stopped.
The FCC, which issues licenses for those allowed to broadcast radio and television in the United States, is just one of a series of agencies that Trump has effectively taken control of during his time in power.
When the political shift in the country now appears to be a fact, at least at a lower political level than the presidency, in other words, there is a lot that can change on the other side of the Atlantic.

After congressman Andy Harris threatened a journalism student, the debate about freedom of the press and threats to journalists in the United States has intensified. Journalists and experts discuss how the political climate and ownership changes affect news reporting.

A year after journalists were barred from the Pentagon, reporters are testifying about tougher working conditions, reduced transparency and a widespread fear among sources of reprisals, affecting the ability to scrutinize the US military.
SVT has mapped a disinformation campaign on Tiktok where AI-generated videos and images are used to call for protests in Järva. Similar campaigns have previously been detected in Spain, but the sender behind the accounts remains unknown.

Several Swedish newspapers, including SvD, GP, Sydsvenskan, DN and Expressen, are speaking out about their policies around AI use after an essay by Emma Engdahl was depublished due to suspected AI writing.

Swedish media organizations such as Utgivarna and Tidningsudgivarna protest against Meta's new terms of use. They fear that Meta will take the right to use journalistic content to train AI and improve its products without compensation.

Lotta Folcker leaves the position as responsible publisher and CEO of Aftonbladet for personal reasons. Karin Schmidt steps in as interim responsible publisher and Emelie Karlsson takes over business responsibility during a transition period.