
The NFL filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to review a Third Circuit ruling that classified Kalshi's sports prediction contracts as CFTC-regulated swaps, arguing instead that such contracts create new risk and should fall under state gambling oversight, citing concerns about manipulation, underage access, and CFTC understaffing.
AI-generated summary
The NFL has expressed concerns about sports prediction markets, citing risks of manipulation, underage access, and inadequate regulatory oversight by the understaffed CFTC. The league previously sought bans on certain high-risk contracts from operators like Kalshi, which were declined.
The NFL has picked a side in the fight over sports prediction markets, and it isn't Kalshi's.
In an amicus brief filed Thursday, the league urged the Supreme Court to take up New Jersey's appeal of a Third Circuit ruling. That ruling found Kalshi's sports event contracts are "swaps" under the CFTC's exclusive jurisdiction, shielding them from state gambling laws.
The Sixth and Ninth Circuits have ruled the opposite way, creating a split only the high court can resolve. Kalshi and prediction market rivals such as Polymarket have long faced pushback from state regulators. (Disclosure: Decrypt's parent company Dastan operates Myriad, a prediction market unavailable to U.S. residents.)
The NFL in its brief sided with the Sixth and Ninth Circuits. It argued that Dodd-Frank's definition of a swap covers instruments that hedge existing risk, not bets that create new risk, which means sports contracts belong under state gambling oversight.
The brief lays out the league's grievances in detail. The NFL said it asked the CFTC and operators like Kalshi to ban contracts that one person could easily manipulate, that involve injuries or officiating, or whose outcomes are knowable in advance, but they declined.
It noted that 18-year-olds can trade on Kalshi while most states require sports bettors to be 21, and that the CFTC has just 543 employees nationwide, suggesting the agency is understaffed to handle the task of policing these markets. Without league-specific lists of prohibited bettors, operators' "nominal insider-trading policies or prohibitions are paper tigers," the brief says.
NFL-related contracts accounted for $1.8 billion of the $3.3 billion traded across prediction markets on the season's first Sunday, according to the brief. The league, represented by former U.S. Attorney General William Barr, wants a ruling before the 2027 season.
It isn't asking for prediction markets to disappear, though. If the justices side with the Third Circuit, the NFL said it would redouble efforts to persuade the CFTC, operators, and Congress to adopt stronger integrity and consumer protections before then.
Sports gaming attorney Daniel Wallach said the brief "meaningfully increases the chances of a cert grant," in a post on X.
"It is extremely telling that the sports league which has most forcefully advocated for federal regulation is essentially saying 'this ain't it,'" he wrote on X. Wallach noted that former CFTC and SEC Chair Gary Gensler and former Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., both of whom helped pass Dodd-Frank, also filed briefs backing New Jersey.
Other leagues have taken a friendlier approach. MLB named Polymarket its exclusive prediction market sponsor in March and signed an integrity agreement with the CFTC, and the NHL became the first major league to license its trademarks to prediction markets. DraftKings and FanDuel have launched prediction markets of their own.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Supreme Court will grant certiorari to hear New Jersey's appeal of the Third Circuit ruling.
Likely · Within months
If the Supreme Court sides with the NFL, state regulators will gain increased authority to oversee sports prediction markets.
Possible · Within months

Federal prosecutors told Judge Katherine Polk Failla that an appeals ruling upholding Bitcoin Fog founder Roman Sterlingov's conviction supports trying Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm in Manhattan.

Federal prosecutors cited the Bitcoin Fog appeals court ruling as supplemental authority against Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm's acquittal motion, arguing New York venue is proper.

Federal prosecutors in New York are using a Bitcoin Fog appeal to oppose Roman Storm's venue challenge in his money-laundering and money-transmission conspiracy case, arguing that a Manhattan customer's brief deposits support venue in the Southern District of New York, despite Treasury and DOJ policy shifts recognizing lawful crypto privacy that have not ended the prosecution.

The Independent Community Bankers of America sued the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on Friday, claiming its decision to grant national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency firms exceeds congressional authority and lacks standard banking safeguards.

Judge Rachel P. Kovner rejected claims by nine alleged fraud victims seeking to contest the forfeiture of approximately 127,271 Bitcoin, ruling they lacked Article III standing due to insufficient connection between their lost funds and the seized wallets, while noting victim remission remains a potential recovery route if the government prevails in the forfeiture action.

The 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Ohio and Tennessee can regulate Kalshi's sports-event contracts under state gambling laws, rejecting the firm's claim that its products are federal swaps. The decision creates a split with other circuits, likely heading to the Supreme Court.