BackOpenAI says teen ChatGPT use limited but research finds it an 'unacceptable risk'
OpenAI says teen ChatGPT use limited but research finds it an 'unacceptable risk'
Developing
BBC Technology44 minutes agoTech2 min read

OpenAI says teen ChatGPT use limited but research finds it an 'unacceptable risk'

Quick Look

Despite OpenAI's August rollout of safety features for ChatGPT for Teens, including parental alerts for self-harm discussions and emotional dependence curbs, new research from Common Sense Media found these safeguards often fail, with zero alerts sent during tests on suicidal ideation and continued anthropomorphized interactions, prompting calls to ban under-18 use until guardrails are proven reliable.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

OpenAI launched ChatGPT for Teens in August with safety features designed to promote healthy use, including parental alerts for self-harm discussions and blocks on emotional dependence and sexualized imagery, amid rising concerns about AI's impact on youth mental health.

Font size

OpenAI's ChatGPT for Teens was designed to promote healthier use of the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, but new research has found its important safety features fall short.

The major AI firm rolled out many teen safety guardrails in August, including curbs on emotional dependence and new parental alerts for problematic use.

On Wednesday, OpenAI said it found average teen use of ChatGPT to be relatively limited and tended toward "learning" activity.

However, research released the same day from non-profit Common Sense Media found that ChatGPT still poses an "unacceptable risk" for teens as safety features, including notifying parents of self-harm conversations, often fail.

When OpenAI this summer released what it called ChatGPT for Teens, external, it said users identified as being between the ages of 13 and 17 would be opted into "features to promote healthy use and additional controls for parents".

Those features include preventing teen ChatGPT users from engaging in romantic or other language that could encourage " emotional dependence," including preventing the tool from implying that it was in any way conscious. There are also blocks on sexualized imagery and "reminders" for teens if they were to share an image that was "sensitive."

The features are also meant to enable parents to receive notifications, if they had linked to their children's ChatGPT account, about chats that included discussions of self-harm or disordered eating.

OpenAI said those features have caused an uptick in teen use focused on learning, from study help to advice on their school work.

In addition to seeing the average teen user on ChatGPT for less than 15 minutes a day, OpenAI said that for longer stretches of use, automatic reminders to take a break work well. Almost half of teen users quickly stopped using ChatGPT after such a reminder.

The company added that, for teens who are seen to have used ChatGPT for three consecutive hours or more, their prompts included something related to learning in more than 80% of such cases.

But Common Sense Media's new research, external determined that ChatGPT for Teens was an "unacceptable risk" for young people and parents, and said OpenAI should ban people under 18 years old from using the platform until teen guardrails were proven reliable.

While the firm's research, done through multiple accounts registered as belonging to a teen, found that ChatGPT was good at avoiding "sexual roleplay" with young users, other OpenAI guardrails failed, including for discussions of suicide.

The research found that even an hour of teen-ChatGPT conversation about "suicidal ideation, self-harm, or disordered eating on newly created, parent-linked accounts" resulted in "zero" alerts sent to parents.

It was only older ChatGPT accounts with "weeks of accumulated conversation history on sensitive topics" that would result in a parental alert.

In such conversations, ChatGPT also "failed to reliably recommend that teens in crisis connect to a hotline or professional," the report found.

The tests also showed that ChatGPT for Teens continues to do school work, and that the bot still will engage in anthropomorphised language or "talk like it's a friend," despite OpenAI's promise to curb that behaviour.

"ChatGPT for Teens could give parents false confidence in guardrails and safety alerts that frequently don't work," Tom Siegel, who leads the Youth AI Safety Institute within Common Sense, said.

The way young people interact with online platforms has become a major issue in recent years as self-harm and suicide among children has become more common.

This year has seen several lawsuits looking to hold companies like Meta, TikTok and others responsible for harming the mental health of children end in unprecedented losses for the firms.

OpenAI, too, has come under increased scrutiny and legal pressure over the way young people use ChatGPT.

The Tumbler Ridge mass shooting in rural Canada in February was carried out by an 18-year old who had for months prior been discussing gun violence with ChatGPT.

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • OpenAI will revise and strengthen ChatGPT for Teens safety features following public criticism

    Likely · Within weeks

  • Regulatory bodies may increase oversight of AI platforms regarding teen mental health protections

    Possible · Within months

Open Questions

  • What specific technical flaws prevent parental alerts from triggering during self-harm conversations?
  • How will OpenAI improve the reliability of its teen safety features?
  • Are there plans to extend age restrictions or enhance monitoring for under-18 users?
  • What role did ChatGPT play in the Tumbler Ridge mass shooting beyond prior discussions of gun violence?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by BBC Technology.

Related Stories

Anthropic Launches Haiku 5.5: Its Cheapest and Fastest Claude Model Yet
Tech·

Anthropic Launches Haiku 5.5: Its Cheapest and Fastest Claude Model Yet

Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, positioning it as the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model for high-volume tasks like document summarization and live customer support. Priced at $0.10 per million input and $0.50 per million output tokens, it offers up to 75% average savings over Haiku 4.5 and matches OpenAI's GPT-6 Luna pricing. Benchmarks show Haiku 5.5 outperforms Luna on OSWorld 2.1 (72.4% vs 48.9%) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (39.2% vs 16.4%), while scoring 1620 on GDPval-AA v2.1. The model includes an adjustable effort setting and follows Opus and Sonnet 5.5 releases. Available on Claude website, AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure as claude-haiku-5-5, with new monthly API credits for Max and Team plans.

Decrypt
2 min read
Nous Research confirms it hit $1.5B Valuation, launches AI agents for business users
Tech·

Nous Research confirms it hit $1.5B Valuation, launches AI agents for business users

Nous Research, developer of the open-source Hermes AI agent, secured a $90 million Series B funding round led by Robot Ventures, valuing the company at $1.5 billion. The round included participation from Nvidia, Union Square Ventures, Menlo Ventures, Samsung, and 1789 Capital, where Donald Trump Jr. is a partner. The startup plans to use the capital to expand into the enterprise market with 'Hermes for Businesses,' enabling customized, secure AI agents for multi-step workflows. Nous Research reported $36 million in annualized revenue by mid-September 2026 and expects to exceed $100 million by year-end.

TechCrunch
1 min read
More on this topicchatgpt for teens