
AI-generated summary
The Korea Copyright Protection Agency began compiling data on illegal distribution of Korean content overseas in 2022, when 477.1 million cases were reported.
SEOUL, Oct. 12 (Yonhap) -- The number of Korean content that was illegally distributed overseas reached nearly 500 million cases last year, the highest number since 2022, a lawmaker said Monday.
The number of reported cases hit 493.6 million in 2025, up 19.2 percent from the previous year, according to the data submitted to Rep. Jeong Jun-ho of the ruling Democratic Party by the Korea Copyright Protection Agency.
The figure is the highest since 477.1 million in 2022, when the agency began compiling relevant data.
Of the total, piracy cases involving webtoons accounted for the majority at 66.5 percent, followed by films and broadcasts at 33.5 percent.
By language, 46.6 percent of the reported cases involved content distributed in English, followed by Chinese at 20.4 percent and languages of Southeast Asian nations at 15.7 percent.
While the number of content illegally distributed in English fell 17 percentage points on-year, the portion of those distributed in languages of Southeast Asian and European nations, such as Vietnamese, Thai, Spanish and French, rose.
Despite a surge in digital piracy cases, the number of illegally distributed content that was deleted came in at 243,374 cases, less than 0.1 percent of all reported cases.
Jeong, the lawmaker, called for an increase in the number of teams monitoring digital piracy and heightened cooperation with overseas authorities.
AI outlook โ possibilities, not facts
Increased monitoring teams and enhanced cooperation with overseas authorities will be implemented to address rising digital piracy.
Likely ยท Within months

The Central Regional Employment and Labor Office announced that it had booked Chairman A of the Incheon Environment Corporation without detention on charges of violating the Severe Accident Punishment Act and transferred it to the Incheon Regional Public Prosecution Office. In relation to an accident in July last year in which a subcontractor representative and a daily worker died from poisoning by harmful gas due to insufficient safety and health measures in a manhole in Byeongbang-dong, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, it was determined that Incheon Environmental Corporation had neglected its safety management obligations as a contractor.

The case filed by lawyer Cho Jae-yeon for leaking the report of the Ministry of Justice's special inspection team regarding the alleged appeasement of former Gyeonggi Province Vice Governor Lee Hwa-young was not indicted. The police and prosecutors determined that the report was likely to have been made public during the court trial.

The court ruled that Democratic Party lawmaker Seo Mi-hwa and the media company should pay joint compensation of 5 million won for spreading and reporting false information about Kim Yong-won, a former standing member of the National Human Rights Commission, who made intimidating remarks at a meeting of the Human Rights Commission.

The Supreme Court ruled that classroom conversations illegally recorded by parents by putting a tape recorder in their child's bag are not admissible as evidence, but separately secured statements from children and guardians can be accepted as valid evidence in child abuse cases. As a result, the original trial's sentence of a fine of 5 million won was confirmed.

The Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a lawsuit filed against the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service by the bereaved family of worker A, who suffered a fall accident at work and died of pulmonary embolism a month later while receiving treatment, to cancel the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses. The court determined that it was highly probable that the fractures and trauma caused by the accident caused deep vein thrombosis and led to pulmonary embolism, which led to death.

Former lawmaker Noh Woong-rae, who was found not guilty in a bribery case, was fined 700,000 won for defaming a businessman by disclosing his criminal history. The Supreme Court confirmed the original judgment and dismissed the appeal.