A contempt petition was filed in the Supreme Court on Saturday alleging that authorities violated the court's October 9 order by closing 45 Delhi Metro stations from 9 pm Friday to 6 pm Saturday during a protest by the Cockroach Janta Party, despite directives ensuring no complete prohibition of metro and train movement into Delhi.
AI-generated summary
The Supreme Court had issued directives on October 9 while hearing a plea challenging the closure of 57 metro stations and cancellation of Delhi-bound trains ahead of a protest by the Cockroach Janta Party against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The court instructed authorities to ensure no complete prohibition of metro and train movement into Delhi on October 10, emphasizing that ordinary citizens must not face unnecessary harassment.
Synopsis
A contempt petition was moved in the Supreme Court regarding the violation of its orders on Metro services. Authorities allegedly closed metro stations in Delhi, disrupting public life during a protest by the Cockroach Janta Party. The Supreme Court had instructed that there should be no complete prohibition of train movements into Delhi. Despite these directives, 45 metro stations were closed due to security concerns surrounding the protest.
A contempt petition was moved in the Supreme Court on Saturday against authorities for allegedly violating the apex court's directives prohibiting a full shutdown of Delhi Metro and Indian Railways train services on October 10 during a protest by the CJP.
Filed by Shailendra Mani Tripathi, the plea names Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan and others as respondents. It contends that authorities persisted in closing metro stations across the national capital in defiance of the top court's October 9 order, resulting in severe disruption to public life and public hardship.
The petition highlights the Supreme Court's directives issued on Friday while hearing a separate plea challenging the closure of 57 metro stations and the cancellation of Delhi-bound trains ahead of the demonstration. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) called the protest against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
During Friday's hearing, a bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana instructed the Centre to ensure no "complete prohibition" of metro and train movement into Delhi on October 10, emphasizing that authorities cannot bring normal life to a standstill. The court observed that while law enforcement agencies retain the authority to regulate unruly crowds, ordinary citizens must not face unnecessary harassment.
"It appears that the notifications are overreaching, as they impose a complete ban upon essential public transportation. Upon our indication that a distinction exists between total 'prohibition' and the 'regulation' of metro and other train movements, Solicitor General of India has fairly agreed to impress upon the authorities to reassess such prohibitions," the bench stated in its order.
Live Events
"Regarding that assurance, we clarify that although there shall be no outright prohibition on the movement of metro trains, a prudent decision may be made to permit the operation of metro trains and other rail services in a suitable and regulated manner," the bench noted.
The court further directed that any such decisions be widely publicized to avoid inconveniencing commuters, and called for the publication of traffic advisories in newspapers and online platforms to facilitate smooth vehicular movement throughout the city.
Despite these directions, an advisory issued by the Delhi Metro confirmed the closure of 45 stations from 9 pm on Friday until 6 pm on Saturday on security grounds.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Supreme Court will hear the contempt petition and issue notices to the respondents
Very likely · Within days
Authorities will issue revised guidelines for metro operations during future protests to avoid contempt proceedings
Likely · Within weeks
The Supreme Court ordered authorities not to impose a blanket ban on Delhi metro and train services ahead of a planned CJP protest, ruling that public transport can be regulated but not completely halted.
The Supreme Court Bar Association urged the Chief Justice of India to intervene following the detention of lawyers by Delhi Police during a protest march in New Delhi ahead of a Cockroach Janta Party demonstration.
India's Supreme Court ruled that deletion of deceased, relocated, or duplicate names during Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls is valid, and that for Andhra Pradesh local body elections, the final voter list available on the election notification date — either post-SIR or the Jan 1, 2026 list — will be used, rejecting YSR Congress Party's plea to defer polls.
Justice Sheel Nagu recused from hearing Punjab government's appeal against a High Court order directing a CBI probe into an alleged bribe syndicate linked to the Chief Minister's OSD, after Justice Dipankar Datta noted concerns about potential controversies and external pressures on judicial impartiality.
The Supreme Court criticized Jharkhand's DGP appointment process for violating its Prakash Singh judgement on residual tenure requirements, issued a notice to Tadasha Mishra appointed a day before retirement, and directed the state to revisit its 2025 regulations while allowing it to file a counter-affidavit in defense.
The Supreme Court of India is set to hear petitions filed by editors of 'The Hindu' and 'Murasoli' newspapers regarding a 2003 Tamil Nadu assembly resolution that led to arrest warrants against journalists, with the assembly having since withdrawn the resolution, rendering the case academic after nearly 23 years of pendency.