Visegrad Four leaders urge Brussels to reconsider policies driving up industrial costs as energy-intensive sectors face closures.
AI-generated summary
The EU has significantly reduced its reliance on Russian energy imports since 2022, leading to higher costs for industrial sectors. The region is simultaneously pursuing a major defense buildup and green energy transition.
The EU can forget about competitiveness while energy prices remain prohibitively high, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has warned, urging Brussels to avoid policies that push costs higher.
Tusk spoke on Thursday at a press conference of the Visegrad Four (V4) β Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic β a Central European grouping that coordinates regional interests within the EU.
βWe can put aside the dream of competing with China or the US as long as energy prices here remain at their current levels,β Tusk said. βThe EU cannot afford to remain naive for even one more day when it comes to various ambitious policies. We must protect our industry.β
Tusk mentioned EU energy and climate measures such as carbon-pricing schemes, noting the region pays some of the worldβs highest electricity prices despite Brussels making competitiveness a stated priority. βEnergy prices in this regionβ¦ must come down,β he insisted. βAnything that creates a risk of higher energy prices for us should be blocked.β
With benchmark TTF gas back near β¬80 per MWh β roughly four times its pre-2022 level β EU industrial electricity prices are still two to three times higher than in the US and nearly 50% above Chinaβs, while gas in Europe can cost up to five times more than across the Atlantic.
Although todayβs energy prices are significantly below 2022 peaks, the crisis has shaved off 15-20% from gas demand, which remains depressed, reflecting not only conservation but a contraction of the industrial base. Many energy-intensive operations were rendered unprofitable. Numerous factories curbed production or shut altogether.
Permanent chemical-plant closures alone have surged sixfold from pre-2022 levels, according to Cefic, while auto-making giants such as Volkswagen, Stellantis, and Renault, as well as multiple other manufacturers, have scaled back or closed European operations amid competition from the US and Asia, and corporate insolvencies have risen.
A major contributor to the EUβs gas woes is the abandonment of cheap Russian energy in light of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. Russia previously supplied around 45% of EU gas imports and 27% of its crude oil, but by 2025, Russiaβs share of EU gas imports had fallen to 12% and crude imports to around 2%.
Several EU leaders, notably German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron, have acknowledged that the loss of Russian supplies has played a role in the energy crisis.
While Tusk, a strong Ukraine supporter, did not explicitly link high energy prices to EU sanctions on Russia and the cutting off of Russian supplies, he cited the Ukraine conflict and βconstant pressure from Russiaβ among the broader challenges facing the region, saying βthe war is a real problem.β
Tuskβs Visegrad peers also warned that Brusselsβ policies are squeezing industry amid the decoupling from Russian energy divorce and ongoing defense buildup.
Hungarian Prime Minister Peter Magyar warned that βdozens of Central European companies are going bankrupt because they cannot afford the price of electricityβ and βcan no longer afford the price of gas.β Magyar challenged Brussels to fund the energy transition it demands.
βIf we need to transition away from Russian gas and oil, if we need to completely phase out fossil fuels, the EU should specify in its next seven-year budget how much assistance affected businesses will receive in turn,β he argued.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico and Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis similarly rejected leaving individual governments to deal with soaring fuel costs and criticized EU policies they said were hurting industry. Fico called for energy-market reforms, while Babis blamed the Green Deal for high costs, refinery closures and declining competitiveness.
The warnings come as the EU prioritizes two costly undertakings: completing its break with Russian energy, while financing a massive military buildup that envisages mobilizing up to β¬800 billion in additional defense spending. Russian LNG is due to disappear from the EU market by the end of 2026 and pipeline gas by autumn 2027.
Critics have warned that these two initiatives will be hard to reconcile and that the rejection of Russian energy will further undermine already flagging industrial competitiveness, and leave some member states scrambling for alternative supplies.
Meanwhile, the US war on Iran and disruption of the Strait of Hormuz are exacerbating the crisis. This, combined with Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping and Saudi energy infrastructure, has pushed Brent crude above $106 a barrel this week.
European households have taken a hit as well. An Ipsos-Secours survey of 10,000 people across ten European countries, released earlier this month, found that 29% were living in precarious circumstances and 73% feared being unable to afford fuel costs. More than a third said they had sacrificed essentials such as food or healthcare to pay energy bills over the past year, while 23% had skipped medical appointments, suggesting energy insecurity is becoming a permanent feature of the cost-of-living crisis.
Moscow has long denounced Western energy sanctions as illegal and self-defeating, arguing they merely redirect Russian exports elsewhere while forcing Europeans toward more expensive and harder-to-obtain supplies. Russia has offered to help fill oil shortages caused by the Middle East conflict and resume supplies to Europe, but says it has received no response.
AI outlook β possibilities, not facts
EU to face continued pressure regarding energy market reforms.
Likely Β· Within months

The Central Bank of Russia left the key rate unchanged, which coincided with expert forecasts. The decision is driven by rising fuel prices, strong fiscal momentum and continued strong lending activity in the country.

Talk about completing the Bank of Russia monetary policy easing cycle after maintaining the rate at 14% is premature, says Garda Capital investment strategist Alexander Bakhtin. In his opinion, the Central Bankβs step is justified, and if inflation weakens, the rate reduction may resume.

The head of the State Duma Committee on the Financial Market, Anatoly Aksakov, said that the Bank of Russia is unlikely to sharply reduce the key rate. At the same time, at the next two meetings, the regulator can reduce it twice by 0.25 percentage points.

The Central Bank of the Russian Federation recorded increased demand for loans from businesses with moderate growth in retail lending. The regulator kept the key rate at 14% per annum, interrupting the cycle of its reduction that had lasted since June 2025.

The Bank of Russia kept the key rate at 14% per annum. The Ministry of Economic Development noted the importance of timely easing of monetary conditions for the investment cycle.

Egypt suffered losses of $11 billion due to decreased Suez Canal revenues. Foreign Minister Badr Abdel Aty explained this as a redirection of ships around Africa amid tensions in the Middle East.