Court seeks response on why contempt proceedings should not be initiated over now-deleted post on official X account of Congress's Keralam unit
AI-generated summary
The Supreme Court issued notice to KPCC office-bearers over a now-deleted social media post on CJI Surya Kant published on the official X account of Indian National Congress's Keralam unit. KPCC submitted that the post was uploaded without office-bearers' approval, was immediately taken down, and an unconditional apology had been issued.
NEW DELHI: Observing that the Constitution is supreme and that no individual or political organisation stands above it, Supreme Court Friday issued notice to office-bearers of Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC), including its president, seeking their response on why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them over a now-deleted social media post on CJI Surya Kant. A bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi was hearing a petition filed by advocate Vineet Jindal seeking suo motu action regarding the post published on the official X account of Indian National Congress's Keralam unit. KPCC submitted that the post was uploaded without office-bearers' approval, and was immediately taken down after it came to the notice of the party. It said an unconditional apology had also been issued.
The bench, however, said SC would examine "whether it has come from the pen or your heart" and agreed to hear the petition. "...Independence of the judiciary is not a matter of political convenience," the court said. It said while judgements are always open to criticism, "freedom of expression cannot be a shield for intimidation or interference with the administration of justice" and "judicial restraint must never be mistaken for institutional weakness".
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Supreme Court will hear the petition and decide whether to initiate contempt proceedings against KPCC office-bearers.
Likely · Within weeks
WCST Enterprises won a decade-long legal battle over condominium garage space 38G-a in Orange County but the California Court of Appeal denied its $292,544 attorney fee request, ruling that prevailing party status alone does not authorize fee recovery without a supporting statute or contract.
Sikkim High Court Chief Justice A Muhammed Mustaque has written to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant requesting transfer of five pending writ appeals to another high court, as the court's working strength of two judges prevents hearing intra-court appeals against single-judge bench orders.
The California Court of Appeal ruled that WCST Enterprises, which won ownership of condo garage space 38G-a after a decade-long dispute with neighbour Berit Ling, cannot recover $292,544 in attorney fees because winning a property dispute does not automatically trigger fee-shifting under California law.
High Court judge vacancies have fallen to 26%, their lowest since July 2009, despite sanctioned strength rising from 906 in 2014 to 1,122. Case pendency across High Courts has reached 64 lakh, with lower judiciary vacancies static at around 5,000 against a sanctioned strength of 25,894 judicial officers.
A Hawaii jury ordered Liane Wilson, known as Liana Shanti, to pay C$56 million to three Canadians for defamation and harassment. The verdict concludes a four-year legal battle involving accusations of cult-like behavior and smear campaigns.
James Gates has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging that his estranged wife used ChatGPT to plan his poisoning. The suit claims the AI provided lethal dosage information and concealment advice. Criminal charges against the wife were previously dropped due to lack of evidence.