
More than eight out of 10 summer 2024 graduates surveyed would still go to university, though subject choice regret is higher.
A survey of summer 2024 university graduates 15 months later shows over 80% still choose university despite pessimism over jobs and debt, though satisfaction with specific subjects and AI-impacted courses has declined.
AI-generated summary
Data supplied by the Higher Education Statistics Agency surveys graduates 15 months after completing their studies.
Gloomy headlines might claim that a degree is less worthwhile than it once was, but one sliver of good news is that the most recent graduates donāt regret their time on campus.
When those who graduated in the summer of 2024 were surveyed 15 months later, more than eight out of 10 said they would still go to university ahead of any other option, despite a media drumbeat of pessimism about graduate jobs and increasing levels of student debt.
Matt Hiely-Rayner, an analyst who compiles the Guardianās University Guide, says the new data supplied by the Higher Education Statistics Agency, was positive news. āVery few students say they would do something different than go to university ā only about 20% of graduates say they would do something completely different.
āAnd the proportion who are happy with the provider they selected has stayed strong and has actually gone up slightly this year, suggesting that people were more satisfied with their choice.ā
But fewer of the recent graduates appeared to be happy with their choice of subject, with just 70% saying they would stick with their original subject.
āEven that is relatively good, there hasnāt been a collapse, which is interesting because weāve seen positive outcomes around graduate jobs continue to come down faster than in previous years,ā says Hiely-Rayner. āSo with hindsight, 15 months after graduation, students are more likely to regret their subject choice than they are going to university at all or which institution they went to.ā
According to the latest data, the University of Bathās graduates were happiest with their choice of institution, leaping above its rivals at Oxbridge and the Russell Group of research universities. The top five universities clustered around 90% of their graduates saying they remain happy with their choice, with just 0.8 of a percentage point separating Bath at the top from Oxford in fifth place.
But that happiness doesnāt extend to subject choices ā with dissatisfaction visible even among most highly selective professional courses that offer well-paid graduate careers.
Fifteen months after graduation, fewer dentists, vets and paramedics than in the previous year said they would choose the same course, while architecture and computer science have fallen out of the top 10 in terms of course satisfaction.
The fall in computer science may be linked to the way AI has replaced entry-level jobs, as well as early career employment opportunities not being as abundant as they once were. Four years ago, 66% of computer science students went on to graduate-level employment but the latest figures show just 56% did so.
AI may also be harming the career prospects of graduates who studied animation and game design, who are now among the least enthusiastic about their career choices. Fewer than two out of three animation and game design graduates would choose the same course again, putting it in the same league as journalism, marketing and PR graduates for highest levels of regret.
The latest data also highlighted a surprising fall in satisfaction in economics, which regularly tops league tables for graduate pay and has seen a surge in interest among A-level students and university applicants.
This may reflect the fact that not all economics courses are created equal, says Hiely-Rayner. āEconomics has always been quite a secure one [in terms of graduate jobs]. It seems like a safe bet, but the proportion who are getting a job varies by institution.ā

The article argues that the debate over AI in higher education wrongly focuses only on preserving critical thinking, neglecting deeper human qualities like curiosity, meaning-making, and inner growth. It contends that AIās ability to provide instant answers presents an opportunity to reinvent universities around question-asking, purpose-driven learning, and holistic development, proposing reforms such as inquiry-based seminars, 'follow the question' requirements, purpose-centered career advising, and a 'capstone of the self' to nurture studentsā existential and intellectual growth.

Tang Jiafeng, a Chinese mathematics professor, is campaigning to remove English as a mandatory core subject in schools, arguing it is irrelevant for most students and hinders native language mastery. The proposal has sparked debate over China's global competitiveness.

Tang Jiafeng, a mathematics professor in China, argues that English should be abolished as a core subject in elementary, secondary, and university education, claiming it is overemphasized and irrelevant to most students' futures, while supporters like Hu Xijin warn that reducing English instruction could harm China's global competitiveness and access to international knowledge.

Families in Cambodia's Tonle Sap floating communities face a growing education crisis as surging fuel prices make boat transport unaffordable. Students are missing classes or resorting to dangerous rowing, while parents struggle with rising costs and declining incomes.

The 2025 PISA study reveals a dramatic global decline in reading and mathematics performance among 15-year-olds, with nearly a third of OECD students categorized as low performers and deeper structural issues cited across education systems.

The 2025 PISA study reveals a dramatic drop in student performance in reading and mathematics worldwide, with OECD reading scores falling by an average of 25 points and nearly a third of students classified as low performers.