
In the case heard at the Istanbul 40th Criminal Court of First Instance, 4 of the 16 defendants were sentenced to 11 months and 20 days in prison for 'insulting the President'.
AI-generated summary
The case was filed due to the slogans allegedly chanted during the protests held in Saraçhane on March 25, 2025.
The fifth hearing of the case in which 16 people were tried on the charge of "insulting the President" in the investigation launched after the protests held in Saraçhane on March 25, 2025, was held at the Istanbul 40th Criminal Court of First Instance.
In his opinion on the merits, the hearing prosecutor cited the expert report prepared by the National Criminal Bureau.
The report claimed that 4 people were in a group chanting slogans simultaneously and that their lip movements were compatible with the statements that were said to contain insults.
In the report, it was stated that for the other 12 names, it could not be determined that the action subject to the accusation or that they shouted slogans.
The prosecutor requested the punishment of four defendants and the acquittal of the other 12 defendants due to lack of evidence.
“THEIR VOICES COULD NOT BE DETECTED”
The defendant's lawyers argued that the images were obtained illegally and that the expert report did not have sufficient certainty for a conviction.
A lawyer pointed out that his client's voice could not be detected in the expert report and stated that the evaluation was made only by reading lip movements.
The lawyer of the other defendants also argued that there was no evidence in the file other than the images, that no voices were detected, and that "highly probable" evaluations were made about the defendants in the images.
ACQUITTED FOR 12 PEOPLE
Court; It was decided to acquit 12 people on the grounds that it was not proven that they committed a crime.
11 MONTHS AND 20 DAYS IN JAIL FOR 4 PEOPLE

Hüseyin Ersöz, the lawyer of journalist Selahattin Günday, who was arrested in the investigation into the death of MİT officer Kaşif Kozinoğlu, submitted a petition for release to the Silivri Criminal Court of Peace, stating that his client was carrying out journalistic activities.

EŞİK reacted to a woman being seen in her pajamas at her home and presented to the public during the operation in Mersin. Stating that privacy was violated, the platform demanded an effective investigation against those responsible.

Media and Legal Studies Association (MLSA) brought the case of journalist Yıldız Tar, who was detained for 100 days in 2025, to the ECHR. In the application, rights violations were alleged through the accusation of journalistic activities and the reasons for the detention decisions.

Osman Aksu, a witness in the investigation into the death of former MİT officer Kaşif Kozinoğlu, claimed that director Osman Exam was threatened by FETO convict Enver Altaylı.

Families started a justice vigil in Ankara Anıtpark for the 78 people who lost their lives in the Bolu Grand Kartal Hotel fire. They demand the Supreme Court to approve the 'possible intent' decisions and complete the investigations against public officials.

In the Ezgi Apartmanı case, where 35 people lost their lives in the February 6 earthquakes, judicial control measures, including an international travel ban and a signature requirement, were brought by the 5th High Criminal Court against the architect Ertan Danacı, who was acquitted, upon the objection of the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office.