
EŞİK described it as a violation of privacy for a woman to be seen and served in her pajamas at her home.
AI-generated summary
The footage of the home of a woman detained during an operation in Mersin and the release of these images to the press created controversy.
Reactions continue against the filming of a woman in her pajamas in her own home during the operations carried out in Mersin and the broadcasting of these images to the public.
In the statement made by EŞİK, it was argued that what happened was not just a video recording, and that the woman's private area and privacy were exposed to the public without her consent.
"WE REJECT THE UNDERSTANDING THAT TURNS EXPOSURE INTO A TOOL OF SHAME"
In the statement, it was stated that women were opposed to ignoring their right to say over their bodies and private lives, while the violation of privacy boundaries and the transformation of exposure into a tool of shame were criticized.
EŞİK argued that detained women should not be exposed to fear, surprise, their bodies or their private moments, and stated that the public power is obliged to protect the privacy of women.
"THE EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATION SHOULD BE CONDUCTED ABOUT THOSE RESPONSIBLE"
In its statement, EŞİK called for an explanation of who recorded the images, to whom they were transferred, and how they were made available to the public.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Request for an investigation against those responsible.
Possible · Within weeks

Hüseyin Ersöz, the lawyer of journalist Selahattin Günday, who was arrested in the investigation into the death of MİT officer Kaşif Kozinoğlu, submitted a petition for release to the Silivri Criminal Court of Peace, stating that his client was carrying out journalistic activities.

Media and Legal Studies Association (MLSA) brought the case of journalist Yıldız Tar, who was detained for 100 days in 2025, to the ECHR. In the application, rights violations were alleged through the accusation of journalistic activities and the reasons for the detention decisions.

A decision was made in the 'insulting the President' case filed against 16 people after the protests on March 25, 2025 in Istanbul. The court ruled that 12 defendants were acquitted and 4 defendants were sentenced to 11 months and 20 days in prison.

Osman Aksu, a witness in the investigation into the death of former MİT officer Kaşif Kozinoğlu, claimed that director Osman Exam was threatened by FETO convict Enver Altaylı.

Families started a justice vigil in Ankara Anıtpark for the 78 people who lost their lives in the Bolu Grand Kartal Hotel fire. They demand the Supreme Court to approve the 'possible intent' decisions and complete the investigations against public officials.

In the Ezgi Apartmanı case, where 35 people lost their lives in the February 6 earthquakes, judicial control measures, including an international travel ban and a signature requirement, were brought by the 5th High Criminal Court against the architect Ertan Danacı, who was acquitted, upon the objection of the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office.