AI-generated summary
Savers Australia operates as a for-profit second-hand retailer, competing with charity-operated shops like Vinnies and Salvos. Its US parent company Savers Value Village is majority-owned by Ares Management and reports strong financial performance.
The buzz was palpable at the latest Savers store opening in Geelong.
Some people had driven hours to line up on August 27 outside the retailer's newest big red box, with one heavily pregnant woman right at the front of the 100-metre queue.
"I have two babies in here, so I need a lot of clothes," she laughed.
The regional Victorian site is the company's 19th store in Australia.
But what is not commonly known is that Savers Australia is the subsidiary of a much larger US company.
The parent company, Savers Value Village (SVV), is worth $2.2 billion, has shares that trade on the New York Stock Exhange and is majority owned by American private equity firm Ares Management.
SVV is also North America's largest for-profit second-hand retailer with 185 stores in the US and 172 in Canada.
Its 50 per cent gross profit margin is well above the industry average and the company earned more than $300 million last year, according to Refinitiv data.
"Larger retailers like Cash Converters, Savers and Vinnies have consistently outperformed their smaller, non-employing counterparts," analytics firm IBISWorld noted recently of its place in the Australian second-hand retail market.
"Primarily owing to their capacity to harness economies of scale."
Why is Savers controversial?
In Australia, its for-profit mission makes Savers an outlier.
It competes directly with non-profit, second-hand retailers Vinnies and Salvos, and smaller charity op shops that rely on selling donated goods to fund community programs.
Some of them are not happy about the expansion of Savers, concerned that its charity donation bins could potentially give it a veneer or "smoke screen" of being charitable.
"We should be keeping as much as what we can in Australia," Esther Koning-Oakes, the boss of one charity near Savers's new store in Geelong, told ABC News.
Ms Koning-Oakes's charity, Norlane Community House, operates an op shop in Geelong called Treasures, which helps fund its drop-in centre.
Unlike Savers, it is small, manned by volunteers and relies heavily on direct community donations.
She is worried Treasures will get fewer customers and donations with its new competitor on the scene.
"I think a lot of people, when they donate things, they want to donate it for a good cause," she said.
"Having it for a for-profit company means that that is going into shareholders or upper management, and it doesn't actually go back into community."
How does Savers's charity partnership work?
Responding to the concerns from local charities, the American head office of Savers told ABC News it gave its Australian non-profit partners $5.6 million last year, which worked out to about $310,000 per local store.
"I'm sorry to hear those concerns because [at] Savers, it's important to us to make sure that we grow in the circular economy," local boss Michael Fisher said.
"In Australia and globally, we partner with not-for-profit organisations.
"They go and solicit donations from the general public, they bring them to the stores, and we pay them for those donations.
"So if you donate to us at the store, you're actually donating to the not-for-profit, and we pay them for that."
Diabetes Victoria boss Glen Noonan was at Savers's recent Geelong launch, where big green bins with his non-profit's logo were on proud display for people to donate into.
Mr Noonan would not disclose what Diabetes Victoria was paid to collect goods for Savers, describing it as confidential.
Yet he said the millions it received last year from Savers was beneficial, and allowed Diabetes Victoria to revenue raise from second-hand donations without the grunt work of running shops themselves.
"From the revenue that we generate, we provide much-needed services to Victorians," he said.
Savers is clearly aware of the space it is operating in and the public perceptions around second-hand retailing.
At its latest Geelong launch, one woman who was excitedly waiting in line to buy Savers goods had some reservations about donating her own belongings to the organisation.
"I will not be donating my clothes here," she said.
"I would rather give back to the Salvation Army or the Geelong Animal Welfare Society."
Those who decide to donate, however, get a voucher for 20 per cent off their next shop at Savers.
Where does the unsold merchandise go?
Savers's financial filings do not break down its overheads in great detail.
Michael Lasser, a retail analyst from investment bank UBS, which has done work for Savers, said its biggest overheads would be staff wages, store overheads and the undisclosed cost of buying used items.
"This is a business that is aimed at more effectively monetising the donated goods for charities," he said.
Like op shops and non-profit second-hand retailers, Savers also needs to deal with all of the donations from charity partners that it cannot sell in Australian stores.
It does not disclose how much stock ends up in landfill, gets sent overseas to the rag trade or is recycled.
Savers, however, emphasises that it offers a solution to waste, with Australia among the largest per-capita consumers of clothing.
Pricing decisions with help of AI
In North America, the company has been using a program backed by artificial intelligence, ThriftIQ, that helps speed up its decision-making on how much to charge for goods.
"It's just in the process of rolling out," Mr Lasser said.
"But it leads to better pricing of products, more productive use of labour, and faster sell-through of the goods."
Savers would not reveal whether it would expand the use of ThriftIQ to its Australian stores.
On a recent analyst call for its quarterly financials, its top executives talked up the technology, as well as the growth the company was experiencing.
The global resale of fashion alone is projected to be worth $444 billion ($US317b) by 2027, according to research by consulting firm McKinsey & Company.
"Younger and more affluent consumer cohorts are still our fastest-growing demographics, which speaks to the power of our model and its ability to resonate with all shoppers," attendees of the Savers analyst call were told.
"For 2026, our plan remains to open around 25 new stores, more than 20 of which will be in the US in 11 states."
The company is more tight-lipped on its plans for Australia, where it employs 1,250 staff across its stores in NSW, Victoria and South Australia.
However, local boss Michael Fisher was evidently preparing for more openings with long lines and gigantic ribbon cuttings.
"It's fair to say that we'll open another store next year," he said.
"We're really excited with the growth of second-hand across Australia and we're happy to participate in that."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Savers Australia will open another store in 2026
Very likely · Within months
Savers will expand ThriftIQ AI pricing to Australian stores
Possible · Within months
A fire at Tasmania's Tungatinah Power Station overnight caused power outages for about 300 households, with investigations underway into the cause. Authorities confirmed no injuries, stated the state's energy supply remains stable, and noted road closures and emergency response efforts.
The ASX 200 gained 0.1% to 8,988 points as ASIC reported 9,807 misconduct reports in H1, with retail investor issues and governance dominating. ASIC chair Sarah Court urged public tip-offs amid KPMG whistleblower claims. Shane Oliver linked rising US bond yields to Trump policies, Iran conflict, and data centre borrowing. Bathla Group faces funding crisis with $3.2B debt and 200 stalled projects. Wall Street closed higher, led by Dell (+15.8%) and NVIDIA (+3.2%), while Palo Alto Networks fell 9.3%. Aussie dollar traded above 71 US cents.
Darryl Byatt and his family have lived in a shed for five months after Cyclone Narelle damaged their Exmouth home in March, citing incomplete insurance assessments and delayed settlements, a situation echoed by other residents facing similar issues with insurers in the remote Western Australian town.
Northern Territory Indigenous traditional owners, frustrated by inadequate rehabilitation bonds from collapsed mining companies like Nathan River Resources, are demanding that future mine operators provide rehabilitation guarantees as a condition of land access, citing a commissioned report showing the current $6.2 million bond is vastly insufficient compared to estimated cleanup costs of $108 million to $1.1 billion.
For five months, a visible steam plume from Whyalla's blast furnace has signaled operational trouble despite appearing normal to outsiders. Locals, including former workers, recognize it as a sign of an aging furnace near collapse. The plant remains in administration after GFG Alliance's financial failure, with Jindal Steel and M Resources as final bidders. While SA Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis confirms funding for administration and expects a sale, he cannot confirm timing. The future of 400 steelmaking jobs, hundreds of contractor roles, and the city's economic stability hangs in the balance, with potential workforce shifts tied to recapitalization and possible transition to electric arc furnace technology.
A KPMG whistleblower claims ASIC must be 'dragged kicking and screaming' to investigate alleged misconduct, as the regulator faces a parliamentary inquiry into audit partner misconduct and whistleblower treatment. The whistleblower alleges ASIC has taken a condescending tone and failed to act on known contraventions, while KPMG classified an audit complaint as an HR issue and omitted it from transparency reports.