
The closure of the Goethe Institutes in Russia is seen as bad news for cultural freedom, but justified as a necessary reaction to the continued propaganda of the Russian House in Berlin and the Putin regime's arbitrariness towards cultural institutions.
AI-generated summary
The Goethe Institutes in Russia were already operating under severe restrictions, while the Russian House in Berlin continued to spread propaganda despite the attack on Ukraine. The DAAD was previously classified as an “undesirable organization”.
In dictatorships like Russia, small islands of relative freedom can mean a lot for people who - even if resistance is only possible at great risk - at least do not want to adapt internally. The Goethe Institutes in Russia could be such refuges in a country where censorship now also reaches the libraries. The closure of the institutes is therefore really bad news.
Nevertheless, it would have been wrong not to close the Russian House in Berlin because of this expected reaction from the Putin regime. The fact that this institution was still able to spread the aggressor's propaganda in the center of the German capital four and a half years after the attack on Ukraine was an unbearable situation.
In any case, the existence of the Goethe Institutes in Russia, which were already operating with severe restrictions, only depended on the arbitrariness of those in power. They have proven on many occasions that they have no scruples about cutting even seemingly non-political cultural connections, for example when they declared the German Academic Exchange Service an “undesirable organization” at the beginning of the year. No matter how much one may regret the end of the Goethe Institute after more than thirty years of presence in Russia, the political damage would have been greater if Berlin had not reacted to the drone attack in Leipzig.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Putin regime will classify more Western cultural institutions in Russia as “undesirable organizations.”
Likely
Germany will increase pressure on the Russian House in Berlin to limit its propaganda activities.
Possible

The BSW accuses Chancellor Friedrich Merz of declaring "forever war" on Russia, while Sahra Wagenknecht emphasized the return of Russian gas and possible cooperation with the AfD during an election campaign appearance in Halle. At the same time, voters in Saxony-Anhalt are expressing frustration and concerns about the AfD, while business representatives are warning about job losses and church leaders are warning about ethnic nationalism. Over 26 demonstrations have been registered for the election weekend.

After the closure of the Russian House in Berlin, Moscow announces the closure of the Goethe Institutes in Russia. Federal Foreign Minister Wadephul regrets the move as damaging to German-Russian relations, while Russia rejects allegations of an attempted attack with a drone at Leipzig/Halle Airport and announced further countermeasures.

Psychologist Valentin Haas explains why the debate about pension reform is being conducted emotionally, which illusions prevail and why retirement needs to be planned not only financially but also meaningfully.

Shortly before the state elections in Saxony-Anhalt, two SPIEGEL colleagues are arguing about whether the AfD, with over 40 percent in the polls, can be stopped through an exclusion strategy or whether an AfD government would be the greater evil.

Two months before the US midterm elections, hosts Nicole Bastian and Christian Lammert discuss the rising costs of election campaigns in the US, estimated at over $9 billion, and explain how Supreme Court decisions since 2010 have enabled the formation of super PACs worth hundreds of millions.

Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt warned of further hybrid attacks by Russia on Germany and announced sanctions. Expert Jukka Savolainen from the European Center of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats describes possible escalation scenarios such as power and internet outages as well as disinformation campaigns and emphasizes Germany's low resilience. He points to the example of the Nordic countries, especially Finland, which is prepared through total defense and citizens, and calls for faster government responses as well as individual preparedness such as supplies for at least a week.