
Pyongyang fortifies a line it now treats as a permanent frontier as South Korea prepares a response to last month's explosion.
Seoul seeks an apology from North Korea for a landmine blast that wounded three South Korean soldiers near the military demarcation line, as Pyongyang fortifies the border.
AI-generated summary
Military personnel are forbidden from crossing the MDL under the 1953 armistice agreement. The 250km line is sparsely marked with few original markers remaining.
Seoul is seeking an apology for last month’s border blast even as Pyongyang fortifies a line it now treats as a permanent frontier
North Korea’s laying of landmines along its heavily fortified border with the South has laid bare how misaligned the two nations have become over their de facto land boundary, after three South Korean soldiers were wounded in an explosion last month.
Seoul blames Pyongyang for the blast near the military demarcation line (MDL) on September 21, in which one soldier lost a foot. On Tuesday, its Foreign Ministry said in a statement it was preparing a response to force an apology for the blast, without going into specifics, further urging the North to hold talks on the poorly signposted MDL.
Military personnel from both sides are technically forbidden from crossing the MDL under their 1953 armistice agreement. As the precise centre line of the 4km (2.5-mile) wide demilitarised zone (DMZ) that bisects the Korean peninsula, it serves as the effective land border between North and South Korea.
But the 250km (155-mile) long line is sparsely marked, with few of the more than 1,200 original markers that were installed over seven decades ago still in place.
A joint investigation by South Korea and the US-led United Nations Command concluded that at least four mines at the site of last month’s blast, 10 metres (32 feet) south of the MDL, were deliberately planted by the North.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
South Korea will announce formal measures or diplomatic responses regarding the border blast.
Likely · Within days

Taiwan's radical candidate Wu Xindai criticized the Taipei City Health Bureau, saying it was confusing the medical and legal concept of methadone as a secondary controlled drug and medicine for political offense and defense, and criticized the city government for putting political interests above the medical profession.

U.S. federal judge O'Toole ruled in a class-action lawsuit on the 6th that the Trump administration's practice of imposing daily fines of $998 on immigrants who received deportation orders but did not leave the United States was illegal because it violated the Administrative Procedure Act and failed to provide an opportunity for public comment.

Shen Boyang, the Taipei mayoral candidate of the Democratic Progressive Party, has a total online voice count of 1.87 million, surpassing Chiang Wanan. However, the blue camp launched an attack because of his old articles from 12 years ago, causing Shen's favorability to turn negative, and Chiang Wanan's negative voice count soared to more than 60%.

Kuomintang legislator Luo Zhiqiang held a press conference and retrieved Shen Boyang's reposted article in 2014, pointing out that he had made remarks on the legalization of marijuana, and asked Shen Boyang and Su Qiaohui to clearly state whether they supported the legalization of the second-level drug marijuana and the idea of community drug supply.

Tainan mayoral candidate Chen Tingfei of the Democratic Progressive Party will set up a campaign headquarters on the 11th of this month, inviting President and Vice President Lai Ching-te, Hsiao Meiqin, Executive Director Zhuo Rongtai and others to attend. She hopes to become Tainan's first female mayor in 400 years and calls on supporters to wear pink and green clothes to face the election campaign.

When Wu Guixiang, head of Xinmin District, Xinpu Town, Hsinchu County, handed out Double Ninth Festival gifts to the elderly, she included handmade cakes and campaign souvenirs from Blue Camp candidate Xu Xinying and others, which was accused of violating administrative neutrality. Wu Guixiang argued that she was not a public servant and that the village chief had off-duty hours; the Hsinchu County Election Committee emphasized that the village chief was a public servant in the broad sense and must maintain administrative neutrality when performing his duties.