The Supreme Court of India has directed states and union territories to impound vehicles with unpaid traffic challans, freeze online services, block ownership transfers, and suspend driving licences to recover approximately Rs 49,194 crore in outstanding fines, of which Rs 26,175 crore has already been collected.
AI-generated summary
The case has been heard for over a decade, with the writ petition filed in 2012. The court has monitored the litigation for almost 14 years and issued multiple directions for implementation of the Motor Vehicles Act and Central Motor Vehicles Rules.
SC said cops could issue lakhs of e-challans, but what was being done to recover the fines was the question at hand.
NEW DELHI: Many vehicle owners often ignore traffic fines for years, allowing unpaid challans to pile up and eventually land in courts. Supreme Court has now directed states and UTs to impound their vehicles, noting that around 47% of challans issued across the country remain unpaid. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan said Thursday that issuing e-challans was not sufficient and stringent action should be taken to recover fines. "Let there be random checking of vehicles, and if it is found that the e-challan issued has not been abided by or honoured, necessary steps shall be taken to impound the vehicle itself," the bench said. SC said the authorities should freeze online services for vehicles with outstanding amounts. They should bar renewal of registration certificates, issuing of duplicate registration certificates, and not entertain any request to update the owner's address, it said. "The authorities shall also deny fitness certificate until all pending traffic fines are entirely cleared and further there should be blacklisting of the vehicle concerned on the Parivahan portal," SC said. "This will come in the way of the person concerned if he wants to sell his vehicle. The authorities should also proceed to block ownership transfer. For multiple violations, driving licence shall be suspended from renewal, and measures shall also be taken to suspend the driving licence which may be in force. What is most important is that no centre should be permitted to issue a PUC certificate," the bench said. Expressing displeasure with authorities for not taking action, the bench said, "We want to convey something to states/UTs/authorities plainly and simply. It is not sufficient to keep issuing e-challans to the person who is alleged to have violated the provisions of the law." SC said cops could issue lakhs of e-challans, but what was being done to recover the fines was the question at hand. "We are informed by the amicus... that states/UTs have to recover Rs 49,194 crore approximately towards the e-challans issued over a period of time. We are also informed that so far an amount of Rs 26,175 crore has been recovered.
Join conversation
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
What we want to convey in simple words is that authorities need to work at the ground level, having regard to the ground realities," the bench said. With the case being heard for over a decade, the court decided to check the ground situation regarding implementation of its orders. "We have been monitoring this litigation by now over a period of almost 14 years. This writ petition is of 2012... During this interregnum period of one year, we have issued a slew of directions for meaningful and effective implementation of various provisions of Motor Vehicles Act and Central Motor Vehicles Rules framed therein," it said, adding that if all these were going to remain on paper and not going to be implemented, then "we may have to take stern action which may not be liked by the authorities".
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
States and UTs will begin implementing vehicle impoundment for unpaid challans
Likely · Within weeks
Recovery of outstanding traffic fines will increase in the coming months
Likely · Within months

Christa Pike, who is on death row in the US state of Tennessee, was admitted to the hospital after being alive despite being given two lethal injections. Lawyers and the governor have ordered an independent review of the incident.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court ruled that a married daughter is entitled to receive a patta for her late father's Nautor agricultural land as a Class-I legal heir under the Hindu Succession Act, invalidating an administrative circular.

The Supreme Court has canceled the preventive detention issued under NSA against businessman Mulla Afroz in the case related to Sambhal violence. The court also imposed a fine of Rs 10 lakh on the UP government.
The Supreme Court declared the preventive detention of Mulla Afroz in the 2024 Sambhal violence case illegal, citing insufficient evidence and misuse of the National Security Act, and imposed a Rs 10 lakh fine on the Uttar Pradesh government to be paid to the detenu, emphasizing that confessional statements alone cannot justify preventive detention.
A Jammu and Kashmir High Court panel rejected a CID report denying security clearance to an HC staffer, ruling that an employee cannot be denied clearance solely due to his brother's alleged antecedents. The committee found the staffer's conduct and service satisfactory with no adverse material against him, citing a prior HC judgment that liability cannot be fastened on an individual for a relative's conduct without evidence of personal involvement.
Natalie and Josh Strong are suing Jacksonville's Brown Fertility Clinic after a DNA test revealed the husband was not the biological father of their daughter. The couple discovered the discrepancy after routine blood tests showed an impossible blood type for the child.