
AI-generated summary
TEDAŞ has initiated the real estate expropriation process in Tekman district of Erzurum province to build an energy transmission line for the Koçyayla Group ENH facility.
T.R. FROM TEKMAN CIVIL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
EXPROPRIATION NOTIFICATION
CORE NO: 2026/154 CORE
In order to build an energy transmission line within the scope of the "Koçyayla Group ETL installation in Tekman District of Erzurum Province" work, the plaintiff TEDAŞ General Directorate has filed a lawsuit for determination and registration of the expropriation cost in accordance with Article 10 of the Expropriation Law No. 2942, as amended by Law No. 4650, regarding the immovable properties whose province, district, neighborhood and parcel numbers, qualifications, registration owners and area to be expropriated are written below, and regarding the immovable property in question. Our court file number is written below. Within the thirty-day period stipulated in Article 14 of the Expropriation Law No. 2942, starting from the date of announcement, an action for annulment of the expropriation transaction can be filed in the administrative jurisdiction or for correction against material errors in the judicial jurisdiction. If those who file an annulment lawsuit in the administrative jurisdiction against the expropriation transaction within the stipulated period do not document that they have filed a lawsuit and decided to stay the execution, the expropriation transaction will be finalized and the immovable property will be registered based on the expropriation fee determined by the court, and all defense and defense related to the subject and the value of the immovable property will be made. The evidence must be notified to our court in writing within ten days from the date of notification, and the expropriation costs to be determined must be submitted to the Turkish Republic on behalf of the defendants. It is announced in accordance with Article 10 of the Expropriation Law No. 2942 that those concerned who have claims and objections regarding the expropriated immovable properties, which will be deposited in Ziraat Bank Tekman Branch, should submit their objections and claims by applying to the case file with the main number specified below. 26/08/2026
LIST OF EXPROPRIATED PROPERTY AND FILED CASES
File Main Number: 2026/154
The real estate in question and the expropriated area (m2): Erzurum Province, Tekman District, Kuruca District, Köy Karşısı Location, 146C25B Sheet, 106 Block, 4 Parcel numbered real estate,
Area where easement will be established: 2.613,64 m²
Real estate owners: Melek YILDIZ, Ali YILDIZ, Ali Ekber YILDIZ, Dilek SAYLIK, Güzel YILDIZ and İmam YILDIZ

In the case of dissolving the partnership filed regarding two real estates in Böğrüdelik District of Yunak District of Konya Province, it was decided to submit a petition to Mehmet GÜLTEKİN, the son of O**N and D**Ü, whose address could not be found, and to notify it on the hearing date dated 16/12/2026.

Trabzon Araklı 2nd Civil Court of First Instance filed a lawsuit requesting the expropriation of the 56.04 m² real estate in Araklı District Birlik District 107 Island 4 Parcel by the 10th Regional Directorate of Highways for the road, construction and safety area, and decided that the response time to the petition was 2 weeks and the objection period to the expert report was 2 weeks.

Botaş initiated an expropriation process for a temporary easement right for 2 years for 695.4 m² of the 1543.05 m² real estate in Pirömer village of Patnos district of Ağrı province and filed a lawsuit for price determination and registration. The announcement was made within the scope of Law No. 2942 and the relevant parties may file a lawsuit for cancellation or correction within 30 days.

Bolu Mayor Tanju Özcan and other defendants, including Deputy Mayors Süleyman Can and Leyla Beykoz, BOLSEV board members Ali Sarıyıldız and Aydan Özdemir, Municipal Council Member Cihan Tutal, Financial Services Manager Naim Ayhan and Bolu Greengrocers Chamber President Mustafa Altındal, were arrested in operations carried out on different dates after February 28. During the trial process, Leyla Beykoz, Aydan Özdemir, Naim Ayhan and Cihan Tutal were released. Within the scope of the indictment prepared by the Bolu Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, a prison sentence of between 90 years and 3 months and 263 years and 6 months was requested for Tanju Özcan. In the lawsuit filed after the indictment, the public prosecutor requested a total prison sentence of 69.5 years to 217 years for Özcan, with the provision of effective repentance for the crime of 'Qualified fraud' against 32 victims. While varying prison sentences were requested for the other 18 defendants, a decision was requested to continue the detention of the detained defendants. The third hearing of the case was held in the Social Sciences High School courtroom at Bolu 3rd High Criminal Court, and Özcan and Süleyman Can were connected remotely via SEGBİS from Ankara Sincan Prison. Özcan rejected the allegations of the prosecutor's office, claiming that it was a perception operation against him, rejected the allegations about the markets and denied the claim of sacrificial donation to the BOLSEV Foundation. Özcan stated that he wanted to be free and sit at home like a cat. The hearing was adjourned until tomorrow morning.
The indictment prepared by the Izmir Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, in which Izmir Business People Gaziemir Housing Building Cooperative was the complainant, was accepted by the Izmir 11th High Criminal Court. The hearing will be held on December 4. In the indictment, prison sentences were requested against 17 suspects, including former Izmir Metropolitan Municipality Mayor Tunç Soyer, former CHP Ankara Provincial Chairman Ümit Erkol and CHP Izmir Provincial Chairman Şenol Aslanoğlu, for the crimes of embezzlement, aggravated fraud, forgery of official documents and negligence of audit duty.

An indictment was prepared against journalist Fatih Ergin, who has been detained since September 28 due to his social media post, on the charge of "publicly disseminating misleading information to the public" in accordance with TCK Article 217/A.