Tanika Bromley murder case adjourned amid evidence disclosure issues
Quick Look
- Tanika Bromley, charged with murder and interfering with a corpse, had her case adjourned in Bundaberg Magistrates Court.
- Her defence raised concerns about delayed evidence disclosure, particularly for weapons charges.
- The matters will return to court on June 30, aligned with her co-accused.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Tanika Bromley is charged with murder and interfering with a corpse over the disappearance of Pheobe Bishop, a 17-year-old whose remains were found in bushland last year. Ms Bromley also faces several weapons offences. Her case was mentioned in the Bundaberg Magistrates Court.
The defence team for Tanika Bromley has raised issues around outstanding material in the brief of evidence.
Ms Bromley has been charged with murder and interfering with a corpse over the disappearance of Pheobe Bishop last year.
What's next?
Ms Bromley's matters have been adjourned to realign the case with her co-accused, James Wood, on June 30.
The defence team for a woman charged over the murder of Queensland teenager Pheobe Bishop has raised issues about delays in receiving parts of the brief of evidence.
Tanika Kristan Bromley, 34, is facing a string of charges, including murder, two counts of interfering with a corpse and several weapons offences.
Pheobe Bishop was 17 when she went missing in May last year. Her remains were found in bushland weeks later.
Ms Bromley did not appear when her matters were mentioned in the Bundaberg Magistrates Court today.
Representing the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Caroline Marco appeared in the Bundaberg courtroom for Ms Bromley's matter in person for the first time.
The court heard Ms Marco was taking carriage of the "more serious set of offences" from police prosecutions with "consent of the police commissioner".
Ms Marco requested Ms Bromley's matters be adjourned to the same date as her co-accused, James Wood.
Both cases are expected to return to court on June 30.
'Piecemeal disclosure' for weapons brief
Ms Bromley's lawyer, Nick Larter, told the court he had written a disclosure letter, asking when the brief of evidence for the weapons charges would be attended to.
The court heard Ms Bromley's weapons offences allegedly occurred on February 24 and May 19 last year.
Magistrate John McInnes confirmed a brief of evidence for all charges was ordered on June 23.
But Mr Larter said he had not received a brief of evidence for the May weapons charges, and the brief for the February offences was missing a ballistics report.
Police prosecutor Vicki Kennedy-Grills said the report had been ordered, but not yet received.
"There is substantial delay in regards to ballistic reports."
she said.
Magistrate McInnes acknowledged concerns around disclosure of DNA and ballistics reports had been raised in August last year, and about "piecemeal disclosure" in April this year.
He asked that Sergeant Kennedy-Grills "get clarification" on the disclosure issues.
Ms Bromley remains in custody and her matters are due to return to court on June 30.
ABC Wide Bay — local news in your inbox
Get our local newsletter, delivered free each Thursday
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The case will proceed to trial.
Likely · Within months
Further delays may occur due to ongoing evidence disclosure issues.
Possible · Within weeks
Open Questions
- When will the full brief of evidence be disclosed?
- What are the specific details of the weapons offences?
- What is the status of the ballistics and DNA reports?
- What is the timeline for the co-accused's case?
