The high wedding fee determined by Çanakkale Municipality for foreign nationals was evaluated as discrimination by TİHEK.
TİHEK deemed the different wedding fees applied by Çanakkale Municipality between Turkish citizens and foreign nationals as a violation of the prohibition of discrimination and fined the municipality 256 thousand 357 liras.
AI-generated summary
In the 2025 fee schedule, Çanakkale Municipality had determined the wedding fee as 2,500 lira for Turkish citizens and 25 thousand lira for foreign nationals.
According to the decision of TİHEK, the board launched an ex officio investigation upon the news that the wedding ceremony fee, which was determined as 2 thousand 500 lira for citizens of the Republic of Turkey in the 2025 fee tariff of Çanakkale Municipality in 2024, will be applied as 25 thousand lira for foreign nationals.
In the written opinion received from the municipality within the scope of the investigation, it was stated that in marriages with foreign elements, the documents were confirmed separately through consulates, embassies, governorships or district governorships, since the e-Municipality Marriage Module provided by the Ministry of Internal Affairs does not cover foreign nationals.
The municipality argued that these operations required more personnel, time and administrative resources.
In addition, the municipality stated that people who want to marry foreign nationals from different provinces of Türkiye made intense applications due to the fact that wedding services were provided free of charge before 2025, and that this caused the marriage procedures of citizens residing in Çanakkale to be disrupted. The municipality stated that the fee schedule was changed in order to give priority to citizens residing within the service boundaries.
In TİHEK's review, it was emphasized that the additional financial burden that would justify the applied wage difference could not be demonstrated with concrete data.
The board evaluated the charging of additional fees from foreign nationals to the standard wedding fees applied to Turkish citizens as different treatment between people in comparable situations, and decided that the practice violated the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race and ethnic origin, and that an administrative fine of 256 thousand 357 liras, above the upper limit, should be imposed on Çanakkale Municipality.
From the justification of the decision
In its decision, the Board pointed out that the confirmation procedures stated by the municipality largely consisted of short-term correspondence and telephone or e-mail conversations, and emphasized that it was not demonstrated with concrete data that these created an additional financial burden sufficient to justify the applied fee difference.
In the decision, it was stated that the wage difference applied to foreign nationals constitutes a disproportionate restriction in terms of access to the right to marry.
The board's decision noted that the municipality's defense that the free marriage practice caused disruptions in the transactions of local citizens was not supported by concrete data, and the following was noted:
"The additional marriage ceremony fee regulation determined to be applied to foreign nationals included in the 2026 Fiscal Year Fee Tariff, which was put into effect while maintaining the same quality as the 2025 Fiscal Year Fee Tariff of Çanakkale Municipal Council, constitutes a different treatment that cannot be justified, is disproportionate and not based on a reasonable justification in terms of access to marriage services within the scope of the right to marry and found a family, and in this respect, it is discrimination guaranteed in Article 3 of Law No. 6701." "It was concluded that the ban was violated on the grounds of race and ethnicity."

6 defendants are on trial in the Bulut Apartmanı case, which collapsed in the February 6 earthquakes in Hatay's Antakya district and 27 people lost their lives. The Ministry of Internal Affairs gave permission for an investigation against some municipal officials who were allegedly responsible for the construction of the building.

In the investigation into the death of Arif Ahmet Denizolgun, the former leader of the Süleymancılar Community, in 2016, public lawsuits were filed against the suspects, including his private doctor and Forensic Medicine officers.

In the investigation carried out by the Bakırköy Chief Public Prosecutor's Office regarding the suspicious death of Arif Ahmet Denizolgun in 2016, 3 separate public cases were filed against 6 suspects within the framework of the new evidence obtained.

Within the scope of the investigation into the suspicious death of former Minister of Transport Ahmet Arif Denizolgun, a public lawsuit was filed against 6 people, including a private doctor and Forensic Medicine officers.

Within the scope of the investigation into the suspicious death of former Minister of Transport Arif Ahmet Denizolgun, a public lawsuit was filed against 6 people, including his private doctor and Forensic Medicine officers.
In the investigation into the death of former Minister of Transport Arif Ahmet Denizolgun, 3 separate lawsuits were filed against 7 people, including his private doctor and 3 Forensic Medicine officers, on charges of forgery of official documents and destruction of evidence.