Trump Administration Proposes Revoking Tax-Exempt Status for Schools with Race-Based Benefits
Quick Look
- The Trump administration has proposed a rule that would strip private schools, colleges, and universities of their tax-exempt status if they provide admissions, scholarships, or other benefits based on race, color, or national or ethnic origin.
- The proposal, announced by the Treasury Department, could affect up to 18,000 institutions and is part of a broader effort to eliminate race-based diversity programs in education.
- It would not apply to religious institutions or race-neutral factors like family income or academic achievement.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The Trump administration has pursued efforts to eliminate race-based diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in education, citing civil rights enforcement and merit-based policies. This proposal follows a 2023 Supreme Court ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard that prohibited race-conscious admissions in higher education under the Equal Protection Clause. Historically, the IRS revoked Bob Jones University's tax-exempt status in the 1970s due to its ban on interracial dating and marriage, a decision later upheld by the Supreme Court.
US President Donald Trump.
The Trump administration has proposed stripping private schools, colleges and other educational institutions of their tax-exempt status if they provide admissions, scholarships or other benefits to students based on race. The proposed rule, announced by the Treasury Department on Thursday, could affect as many as 18,000 institutions and is part of President Donald Trump’s broader push to eliminate race-based diversity programmes in education, the Associated Press reported. Under the proposal, schools that provide benefits on the basis of race, colour or national or ethnic origin could lose their tax-exempt status. However, the rule would not cover religious institutions or race-neutral considerations such as family income, individual hardship, military family status or academic achievement. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said institutions would not be able to avoid the proposed restrictions simply by changing the language used to describe race-based programmes. “Schools rebranding race-based preferences as equitable, inclusive, or diversity-enhancing does not change their discriminatory nature,” Bessent said. The proposal would apply to private primary and secondary schools, colleges, universities, professional schools and trade schools, including institutions that do not receive federal funding.
Schools could face fundraising impact
Losing tax-exempt status could have consequences beyond the taxes institutions themselves would have to pay. Donations to tax-exempt organisations are generally eligible for tax deductions, meaning schools could find it harder to attract contributions if donors lose that benefit. The administration has increasingly used federal policies to challenge diversity, equity and inclusion programmes at educational institutions. Trump has also targeted Harvard University in his broader dispute with colleges over what he has described as ideological and antisemitic problems on campuses. The proposed regulations are scheduled to apply to taxable years beginning on or after May 31, 2027, if they are finalised. The proposal will first go through a public comment process and could be modified before becoming final.
Supreme Court ruling cited
The Treasury Department cited a 2023 Supreme Court ruling involving Students for Fair Admissions in support of the proposed regulations. The court ruled that colleges could not consider race in admissions decisions under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The ruling directly concerned admissions, but its impact extended to other areas of higher education, including race-specific scholarships and financial aid programmes. There is also a historical precedent for the government revoking a college’s tax-exempt status. Bob Jones University lost its tax exemption in the 1970s after maintaining a policy banning interracial dating and marriage. The Supreme Court later upheld the IRS decision. Education leaders have criticised the latest proposal, warning it could create additional compliance requirements and uncertainty for colleges while affecting scholarship funding. The administration, however, has described the move as an effort to ensure that educational institutions follow federal civil rights requirements and restore merit-based policies.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The proposed rule will face legal challenges from civil rights groups and educational institutions if finalized.
Very likely · Within months
The rule will undergo modifications during the public comment process before potential finalization.
Likely · Within months
Institutions affected by the rule will experience decreased donations due to loss of tax-deductible status for contributors.
Likely · Short term
Open Questions
- How many institutions will actually lose tax-exempt status if the rule is finalized?
- What specific criteria will determine whether a program is considered 'race-based' under the rule?
- How will the rule affect financial aid and scholarship programs that consider race as one factor among many?
- What legal challenges are expected if the rule is finalized?