Susie Wiles replaced by Stephen Miller as chief of staff; Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faces potential impeachment from Democrats and Republicans
AI-generated summary
After the Republican Party's crushing midterm defeat, President Trump reshaped his administration by replacing chief of staff Susie Wiles with Stephen Miller and offering the press secretary job to UFC chief Dana White. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, confirmed by the Senate 51-50, faces impeachment threats from Democrats and some Republicans. Hegseth's support for US military intervention in Iran is unpopular and has pushed fuel prices up.
The message from the White House is clear: Donald Trump is not backing down. He is doubling down.
In the days after his Republican Party's crushing midterm defeat, the US president wasted no time reshaping his administration.
Trump's chief of staff Susie Wiles (considered vaguely moderate by MAGA standards) was replaced with hardliner Stephen Miller.
The president then offered the job of White House press secretary to his friend Dana White, the UFC chief executive.
Some analysts argue that a wounded Trump looking to leverage his final two years in office may be tempted to revamp his team with several changes.
And there is mounting speculation that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth could be among them.
Hegseth, a former soldier and television presenter, was widely considered among Trump's most controversial cabinet nominees when the president returned to the White House for a second term.
Despite concerns from both sides of the congressional aisle about Hegseth's ability to run the world's largest military, the Senate confirmed him 51 votes to 50.
Hegseth, a combative Trump loyalist, has made few friends on Capitol Hill (even among Republicans) since his appointment.
Experts identify the 46-year-old's largest political vulnerability as being his vocal support for US military intervention in Iran.
The war is deeply unpopular with many Americans — something they made clear at the midterms.
It has weighed the Trump administration down and pushed fuel prices up.
Could Trump, who is refusing to take any responsibility for last week's electoral humiliation, look to make an example of Hegseth?
Tom Popinsky, a professor of government at Cornell University, said the president turning on one of his favourite appointments is not out of the question.
"You need to understand this in terms of President Trump imagining he's running The Apprentice reality television show again, in which he gets the chance to make big news by saying he's firing somebody," Professor Popinsky said.
"I think the argument for this happening is that he would interpret this as a TV ratings bump. He would get a ratings bump for firing Hegseth."
While Professor Popinsky said it was impossible to know whether this would happen, he added: "I do believe it's incredibly appealing from Trump's perspective to just go on TV and say: 'Hegseth, you're fired'.
"You can imagine this happening, you can imagine the spectacle around it."
Hegseth is said to have a good relationship with the incoming White House chief of staff.
After Miller's appointment on Friday, the defence secretary posted on social media: "Patriots in control."
Hegseth 'incompetent and corrupt'
Trump has publicly supported Hegseth, the value of which is unclear, because it did that with Wiles too.
In his final two years, Trump may decide to back people he perceives as uncompromising, like the former Fox News host, even more fervently.
But if the president does not move on his defence secretary, it appears Congress will.
From January, the Democrats will control both houses, and multiple politicians have already said they plan to impeach Hegseth.
Colorado Democrat Jason Crow posted a video online last week in which he confirmed he was "going after Pete Hegseth".
"Not only is he incompetent and corrupt, but he is undermining the safety of our troops," he said, adding, "I'm going to be relentless, night and day, to get him out of the Pentagon".
However, there is also speculation that defeated Republicans with nothing to lose could make an example of the defence secretary before they are replaced early next year.
Outgoing Republican congressman Thomas Massie, an outspoken critic of both Trump and Hegseth, has promised to force a vote on impeaching Hegseth as one of his final acts.
Massie has already attempted to impeach Hegseth previously, alleging the defence secretary had abused his powers in strikes on Iran and Yemen, ordering deadly attacks on small boats in the Caribbean, and a political investigation into anti-Trump Senator Mike Kelly, among other controversies.
He has urged the president to replace Hegseth and nominate a replacement before Republicans lose control of Congress (in the US, the Senate must approve key cabinet appointments).
"I would not be surprised if Hegseth resigned before January, or at least offered his resignation to Trump," Stephen Ansolabehere, a professor of government at Harvard University, told the ABC.
In a video posted on social media, Hegseth described Massie as a "disgruntled, defeated congressman" who was conspiring with "Democrat allies" to impeach him.
The defence secretary said this was "political theatre, disguised as power".
"In case you hadn't noticed, they're obsessed," Hegseth said.
The House has only ever impeached two cabinet officials in history. Neither was convicted by the required two-thirds Senate majority.
Professor Popinsky described the current situation surrounding Hegseth as "norm breaking of the highest level".
"I think it is a signal both of the problem, and the magnitude of the solution," he said.
On top of allegations of corruption and abuse of power, which Hegseth denies, critics have highlighted his judgement and style as issues.
He has also been accused of blocking promotions and removing members of the Pentagon's top brass due to personal differences.
Hegseth made headlines in September when he gave a speech to soldiers and enlisted leaders at a base in Virginia outlining the force he wanted: "No fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos, no wimps, no radicals."
Hegseth's October announcement that the US military would live-stream an execution by firing squad next month (something Trump has subsequently cancelled) saw him put on notice in Washington.
"I believe members of the Senate and Congress let Hegseth know he would be impeached if he did that," Professor Popinsky said.
"These are things that even conservative Republicans who have a strong fondness for the military find distasteful."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Congress will impeach Pete Hegseth
Possible · Within months
Hegseth may resign before January
Possible · Within months
Victorian prisons are 92 per cent full as both major parties promise tougher law-and-order policies, potentially forcing new jail construction costing over $1 billion and additional corrections officers, with neither side confirming cost factors.
Senior Labor sources are preparing for an election contest against Andrew Hastie as opposition leader, believing he will replace Angus Taylor and be harder to defeat. The Coalition faces pressure from One Nation, with Taylor's leadership under scrutiny after poor polling and internal divisions over war support and cost-of-living pressures.
Tony Abbott has described Julia Gillard's seething misogyny speech as "pretty over the top", conceding he did not expect it to become the "iconic moment" it has. Speaking to ABC iview's I Was Actually There, Mr Abbott said he had known Ms Gillard for a long time before the speech and regarded her as a "formidable politician", with the pair sharing mutual respect for one another. But he acknowledged that respect was "fraying" ahead of the now-historic moment 14 years ago. "Given that, I say, I am not conscious of ever treating women differently simply by virtue of them being women, I certainly am not conscious of ever having treated women in a lesser way." Of the speech, Mr Abbott said he thought most of Ms Gillard's accusations against him were "over the top". "Gillard trotted out a whole lot of things where I was regarded as having acted in, I guess, an old-fashioned, ham-fisted, insensitive way," he said. "But again, I think most of those accusations were either over the top or slightly unfair." Ms Gillard said she knew she was going to be targeted in parliament that day over a controversy embroiling Labor's hand-picked speaker, Peter Slipper. While Ms Gillard said the speech was delivered off the cuff, she had asked her team to compile a list of Mr Abbott's "most sexist quotes" for her to refer to. "What was completely ironic about this attack, is Tony Abbott was almost, you know, rent-a-gaffe about sexism issues," she told I Was Actually There. "It's almost like a game of cards, 'I'll not only see you, I'll raise you because you definitely said this'." The political context Ms Gillard rose to her feet that day in response to a motion from Mr Abbott accusing the government of sexism and misogyny because of its decision to install, and later not remove, the Speaker of the House, Peter Slipper. Slipper, a Liberal MP, had been convinced to take up the role to help Labor maintain its own numbers in the House of Representatives, given it was already a minority government. There were calls for Labor to remove him from his position after he was accused of sexual harassment by his former staffer James Ashby. It was also revealed that slipper sent a number of highly offensive and sexist text messages to Ashby about female genitalia. Despite this, Ms Gillard and the government refused to remove him from his role — prompting criticisms of double standards when it came to sexism. "Obviously, the prime minister had made what was a highly theatrical, politically powerful piece of drama," Mr Abbott said. "But the fact that by the end of the day the Speaker had resigned, I thought was a complete vindication of everything that I'd said in the parliament." Mr Abbott also described a comment he made just before the speech that the Labor government should "already have died of shame" as "a bit of a niggle". The quote was a repeat of controversial remarks made by radio host Alan Jones in the wake of the death of Ms Gillard's father. It was those words that spurred Gillard to respond. At the time, the press gallery's reaction to the speech was similar to Mr Abbott's; that Ms Gillard had attempted to redirect criticism of her and her government's handling of the Slipper affair. But as the speech travelled around the world, it soon became clear it had struck a different nerve. An 'iconic' moment in the making While Mr Abbott didn't realise what the speech would become, he acknowledges the life it's taken on since. "It was an effective parliamentary tactic on the day, but I had no real reason to think that it would become some iconic feminist moment," he said. As for Ms Gillard, the speech is still raised with her often, both at home and abroad. But unlike the millions of viewers online, she revealed she has never watched the speech back. "I've always wanted my memories of that day not to be coloured in by watching the film of it, the video," she said. "I wanted to just feel it and remember it the way it was. That's my memory and I want it to stay that way."

The Queensland Liberal National Party government faces accusations of using intimidation and funding cuts to silence critics, including independent commissioners and community advocates, fostering a 'culture of fear' regarding youth justice and child safety policies.

In Melbourne's affluent Kew electorate, voters and activists debate the future of Victoria's treaty with First Nations people. The state opposition has pledged to repeal the legislation, while supporters argue it is a vital step toward self-determination.
The South Australian government plans to ban councils from issuing ticketless parking fines, requiring inspectors to leave physical tickets on vehicles rather than mailing them after camera car scans.