US Judge Dismisses Most Claims in Celsius Lawsuit Against Chainalysis
One aiding-and-abetting claim survives while 12 other claims are dismissed with prejudice in the Celsius litigation administrator's lawsuit against Chainalysis.
Quick Look
A US federal judge dismissed most claims in a lawsuit brought by Celsius Network's litigation administrator against Chainalysis, but allowed an aiding-and-abetting claim over a 2020 press release to proceed.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Celsius froze withdrawals and filed for bankruptcy in July 2022 amid a crypto market crash, leaving billions in assets inaccessible.
A US federal judge has dismissed most claims brought against Chainalysis by Celsius Network’s litigation administrator, but allowed one to proceed.
The surviving claim alleges Chainalysis helped Celsius insiders breach their fiduciary duties.
US District Judge Margaret Garnett denied Chainalysis’ bid to dismiss the aiding-and-abetting claim in a ruling issued Tuesday. She found that the complaint sufficiently alleged that Chainalysis knew a 2020 Celsius press release contained false statements and helped disseminate them.
The judge dismissed 12 other claims with prejudice, preventing the plaintiffs from amending them in this case.
Three consumer-protection claims were dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiffs have until Oct. 20 to amend those claims or tell the court they will not do so.
Celsius, a crypto lender, filed for bankruptcy in July 2022 during the crypto market crash. It froze withdrawals a month earlier, leaving customers unable to access about $4.7 billion in assets. The Chainalysis lawsuit is part of the estate’s effort to recover funds for creditors.
Chainalysis told Cointelegraph it was unable to comment. Celsius’ litigation administrator had not responded before publication.
Celsius lawsuit centers on $3.3 billion “audit”
In 2020, Celsius enlisted Chainalysis to help calculate its assets under management using the company’s Reactor software and later publicized the results as an audit.
According to the complaint as summarized by the court, a Celsius executive initially calculated about $1.18 billion in assets using Reactor before changes to the methodology increased the figure to roughly $3.3 billion.
A Dec. 9, 2020 press release announced an “audit” confirming about $3.3 billion in Celsius assets using Chainalysis Reactor, based on transactions, total deposits and total withdrawals since Celsius launched the service in 2018.
The complaint alleges Chainalysis helped draft, edit and approve the release and knew that statements describing the work as an “audit” and “independent verification” were false or materially misleading.
The allegations have not been proven, and Chainalysis sought to have the complaint dismissed in its entirety.
Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium, or BRIC, brought the lawsuit. It acts as litigation administrator and recovery manager for the Celsius estate and is pursuing claims on behalf of Celsius and certain former customers.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Plaintiffs must amend consumer-protection claims or notify the court by Oct. 20.
Very likely · Within weeks
Open Questions
- Will the plaintiffs amend the dismissed consumer-protection claims by October 20?
- How will Chainalysis defend against the surviving aiding-and-abetting claim in court?







