
Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado criticized Donald Trump's oil agreement with Venezuela's interim government led by Delcy Rodríguez, asserting that the country's natural resources belong to the Venezuelan people, not an illegitimate regime, while navigating a diplomatic balance to avoid provoking the White House.
AI-generated summary
The article describes Donald Trump's announced oil deal with Venezuela's interim government led by Delcy Rodríguez, following the alleged abduction of Nicolás Maduro by US special forces in January. María Corina Machado, a Nobel peace prize winner and opposition leader, had been expected by many observers to replace Maduro but was sidelined after Trump backed Rodríguez instead.
The Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado has questioned Donald Trump’s oil deal with Venezuela’s interim government, saying the country’s natural resources do not belong to “an illegitimate regime”.
In her first public comments since Trump announced what he called “the biggest oil deal in world history” with Venezuela last Friday, Machado walked a diplomatic tightrope between challenging the agreement and trying not to rile the White House.
In a video posted on social media, the Nobel peace prize winner said: “Of course the United States is the principal partner Venezuela needs to fully develop its strategic potential. This is what the majority of Venezuelans believe … and it is something I’ve spent my whole life defending.”
However, Machado said, the current occupants of the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas were “enemies of the US”, saying they did not have the right or the democratic mandate to negotiate Venezuela’s natural resources. “The wealth of our subsoil does not belong to an illegitimate regime – it belongs to the Venezuelan people,” she said, adding that supporters felt “sadness and anger” at being excluded from the decision-making process.
Venezuela has the world’s largest proven crude oil reserves with an estimated 303bn barrels, of which more than 65bn barrels are involved in the agreement.
Trump’s deal was struck with the un-elected interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, who took power in January after her predecessor, Nicolás Maduro, was abducted by US special forces.
Many observers expected Trump to replace Maduro with Machado, a conservative democracy activist who later gave the US president her Nobel prize award. But instead Trump backed Rodríguez, threatening: “If she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price – probably bigger than Maduro”, and sidelined Machado.
The White House claims the oil deal will help secure US “energy dominance for the next century” as well as “purging foreign malign influence from our back yard” by excluding China and Russia.
Speaking outside the Miraflores palace on Wednesday, the US energy secretary, Chris Wright, said the aim was “to massively grow production and economic opportunities in Venezuela”, adding: “President Trump has a clear mission in Venezuela. The mission is to bring peace, freedom, opportunity, and prosperity to everyone in Venezuela.”
But there has been widespread condemnation of what critics call a predatory and colonial-style land grab. Machado’s supporters fear the deal makes Washington far less inclined to push for fresh presidential elections.
Machado’s movement is widely believed to have beaten Maduro by a landslide in the last such vote, in 2024, but he refused to accept the result and clung to power until his dramatic rendition on 3 January this year.
On Wednesday, Trump and Rodríguez brushed off questions about when an election might be held. “You had a very powerful, very nasty dictatorship in Venezuela – and they’re just not going to be ready for it yet,” Trump told reporters, before adding vaguely: “But soon.”
Rodríguez said: “There will be an electoral process, but when Venezuela is ready.
“I don’t set dates,” she added.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Fresh presidential elections will be held in Venezuela when the country is deemed ready by the interim government
Possible · Within months
The Trump administration will continue to support Delcy Rodríguez's interim government despite criticism
Likely · Within weeks

At least four people were killed, including a four-year-old child, in a suspected US airstrike on a wedding in Kuhestak, Iran, on Tuesday night. The Iranian Red Crescent reported 67 injured and called for an ICC investigation, labeling the attack a war crime. The US military said it is looking into the incident but maintains it does not target civilians.

US President Donald Trump described a 'mowing the grass' strategy for Iran, involving repeated strikes to prevent military reconstitution in the Strait of Hormuz, after US forces attacked Iranian air defense, radar, maritime and communications sites. Iran retaliated with rocket and drone strikes on US facilities, with Jordan intercepting 10 of 13 ballistic missiles. Experts warn the approach risks accelerating Iran's nuclear pursuit and becoming an endless Sisyphean conflict, as temporary successes are undone by Iranian repairs and procurement.

Jadon Nicoara, 27, survived a bear attack while hunting caribou in Alaska after his cousin Dan shot the animal and provided medical aid. Nicoara suffered severe facial injuries and feared he would die before reaching help, but is now recovering at home in Walla Walla, Washington.

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez stated that no evidence has been found to support claims that Morocco orchestrated the surge of approximately 72,000 migrants who crossed into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta in late July, though he acknowledged Moroccan police allowed crossings during a 10-hour peak period on July 30.

Syria’s new leadership has begun destroying remnants of al-Assad’s chemical weapons programme, including raw materials and munitions, confirming the first OPCW-verified destruction since 2014 at a UN briefing.

Benjamin Franklin once criticized German settlers in America for refusing to adopt English language and customs, a sentiment echoed today by anti-immigrant parties like Germany's AfD. The article traces German emigration to America and Russia, the harsh conditions of transatlantic voyages, the exploitation of migrants through bonded labor, and the long-term integration struggles in both the U.S. and Germany, where despite high migrant-background populations, many still feel excluded due to societal perceptions.