
The author explores the complexities of China's stance on AI safety, noting that the country's AI safety community is actively engaging with frontier risks, as evidenced by the recent AI Safety Governance Framework 3.0.
AI-generated summary
The article discusses the lack of international consensus on AI safety and references China's internal regulatory efforts.
That absence has triggered considerable discussion. During my recent visit to New York, many US friends asked whether Beijing would ever agree to some form of arrangement. Before predicting whether China would say yes or no, we need to unpack several other questions first.
The first question we need to clarify is who we are talking about when we ask, “What does China think?” If you ask people in China’s AI safety community, I expect many of them to be seriously concerned about frontier risks and already working on these questions. We can see this from the AI Safety Governance Framework 3.0 recently published by the National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity of the Standardisation Administration of China.

Germany and France proposed that the EU establish powerful trade countermeasures tools to deal with economic coercion from China and other countries. The plan is intended to serve as a "second strike" by restricting market access, but experts question the tool's actual deterrent effect against a backdrop of high reliance on China for key raw materials.

The U.S. FBI arrested California real estate agent Zhang Wanying on October 4, accusing her of being instructed by Chinese officials to follow and collect information on Lai Ting, the eldest son of Taiwan President Lai Ching-te, and his residence and vehicles in the United States. The case highlights China's pattern of cross-border repression using overseas civilians to outsource intelligence, and has triggered discussions about loopholes in Taiwan's national security laws.

Zhang Houguang pointed out that Taiwan should respond to China's Taiwan-related system's strategy of using market resources to gain political expression from artists. It should not simply oppose or rely on subsidies, but build a sound cultural industry chain so that creators can have free creation and an international stage in Taiwan. This will fundamentally enhance the attractiveness of staying in Taiwan and prevent talents from being forced to exchange value due to lack of opportunities.

The G216 line of Tibet's Jilong Port was damaged by the disaster, and China Aneng deployed militarized engineering troops to repair it. The author believes that Taiwan should learn from its "National Engineering Resilience" and establish a professional disaster relief mechanism. At the same time, it should be wary of the opacity and excessive publicity of disaster relief information under the authoritarian system, and use a pragmatic attitude to improve the defense resilience of the whole society.

Harvard University is proud of Taiwan's successful cases as its teaching program, but the author points out that while Huida CEO Jen-Hsun Huang appreciates Taiwan as the epicenter of AI core, he should also be wary of potential system and tax justice issues such as geopolitics, tariff crisis, and corruption of high-level officials of the Central District Internal Revenue Service.

The Russia-Ukraine war has entered its fourth year. The author Lu Zhi pointed out that the war originated from Putin's misjudgment of Ukraine's will to resist. The article uses this to reflect on Taiwan, explore cross-strait exchanges, the stance of the Golden Horse, national defense arms purchases and asymmetric combat power, emphasizing that the key to avoiding war is to prevent Beijing from mistakenly thinking that Taiwan is weak and can be bullied.