
The former president of the Government alleges a lack of impartiality after the statements by the general director of the firm about the value of the seized jewelry
The former president of the Government José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has filed an appeal to disqualify the Yanes jewelry store as an expert in the Plus Ultra case, alleging a lack of impartiality after public statements about the value of its jewelry.
AI-generated summary
José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero is being investigated in the so-called Plus Ultra case. The National Court appointed the Yanes jewelry store as an expert to appraise the seized jewelry.
The former president of the Government José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has filed an appeal before the Criminal Chamber of the National Court in which he once again requests the recusal of the Yanes jewelry store, alleging that it is not impartial.
The former socialist leader, investigated in the so-called Plus Ultra case, reiterates that the general director of this firm already stated in an interview in La Sexta that the jewelry that was seized by the Judicial Police in his office has a value of two million, a figure notably higher than that established by the first judicial appraisal, carried out by Ansorena, and which set its "replacement value" at 1.3 million. These manifestations "decrease the reliability of the results," he points out.
Zapatero's lawyer, Víctor Moreno Catena, argues that the assessment that Yanes is going to make will incur a "vice of objective partiality of the judicial expert." At the same time, he highlights that his choice does not come "from the list of judicial experts of the Community of Madrid." "We do not know the reasons that led the instructor to designate her as an expert," the appeal emphasizes.
For this reason, Moreno Catena considers that Yanes "does not have official personnel whose statutory obligations include those of ensuring the general interest" and adds that "the impartiality of the expert is a relevant value that must be preserved and his objectivity is decisive."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Criminal Chamber of the National Court will rule on Zapatero's appeal.
Very likely · Within weeks

Judge Beatriz Biedma has appeared before the judge of the National Court Santiago Pedraz and has declared that she feels "distressed" after learning that the PSOE sewers asked to do her "physical harm" and asked about her at her children's school.

The Madrid Prosecutor's Office has requested the acquittal of Begoña Gómez in the case for alleged influence peddling and embezzlement, arguing that there were no irregularities in the university professorship or profit motive in software development.

Judge José María Escribano has summoned Minister Sara Aagesen, Pedro Saura, Manuel de la Rocha and eight other people as witnesses in the investigation of the rescue of Air Europa for 475 million euros.

Judge Jorge Martínez Rubio admits in a letter to the CGPJ that he accompanied his wife, the magistrate investigating the damage in Valencia, in victim statements to alleviate their "emotional exhaustion", denying interference.

The Prosecutor's Office has requested the Provincial Court of Madrid to acquit Begoña Gómez, wife of the President of the Government, of the crimes of embezzlement and influence peddling, considering that the facts do not constitute a crime.

The Constitutional Court has protected former councilor Dolors Bassa by considering that the Supreme Court violated her rights by not applying the amnesty. This decision has caused Judge Pablo Llarena to lift the national arrest warrant against Carles Puigdemont.