
AI-generated summary
The policy of deferred prosecution and addiction treatment has been implemented in Taiwan for more than 18 years. First-time drug offenders who meet the conditions can receive deferred prosecution. They need to pay for medical treatment at their own expense and report for urine tests regularly. If they violate the rules, they will face revocation or imprisonment.
Jianqing's review quoted Ko Wenzhe's quote of "treating drug addicts as patients, not prisoners" to counter Huang Guochang's criticism that the prosecutor's decision to grant drug-related prosecutors deferred prosecution was a "cover-up to hide their ugliness." (File photo)
Prosecutor surnamed Liu from the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office was granted deferred prosecution because he was a first-time drug offender and had a good attitude. However, Huang Guochang, chairman of the People's Party, criticized the prosecutor for covering up the scandal and allowing people to go to the village safely. The prosecutor reform group "Jianqing Correction" today stated that deferred prosecution addiction treatment still requires medical treatment at one's own expense and regular urine tests. It angrily denounced Huang as "either stupid and ignorant, or maliciously inciting confrontation", and quoted Ko Wenzhe's quote "Treat drug addicts as patients, not prisoners" to counterattack.
Jianqing's review pointed out that when Ko Wenzhe attended the "Polaris Anti-Drug Project and Taipei City Drug Harm Prevention Center" press conference in June 2018, he said: "Because I am a doctor, we will look at things from a different perspective. Everyone must change their mindset and regard drug addicts as 'patients' instead of 'prisoners.'"
Please read on...
In August of the same year, Ke attended the "Addiction and Drunk Driving Medical Intervention Event" and once again emphasized that alcohol and drug addicts should not be treated simply as prisoners, but as patients, as long-term effects will be better. It is useless to rely solely on the judiciary or the police to arrest people for addiction problems. The relapse rate is still high after being released. Health, social affairs, justice, police and medical units must jointly intervene to reduce recidivism through medical treatment. In this way, Jianqing's review called on Huang Guochang to follow Ke's ideas and return to "scientific rationality and pragmatism."
In response to Huang Guochang's criticism of deferred prosecution and addiction treatment as "safety", Jianqing said, "If he is not stupid and ignorant, he is maliciously inciting confrontation." The statement pointed out that during the period of deferred prosecution supervision, the defendant must pay for outpatient services at his own expense, regularly report to the supervisor, and have urine tests. If he violates the rules, he will face revocation of deferred prosecution, observation of rehabilitation, or imprisonment. It does not mean that he will be fine if he is granted deferred prosecution.
Jianqing said that the policy of deferred prosecution for addiction treatment has been implemented for more than 18 years, and the rate of first-time offenders receiving deferred prosecution for addiction treatment exceeds 70%; if those who are already in prison, in custody, have committed another violent felony, are seriously ill, refuse to appear in court, or refuse to plead guilty, the rate is even closer to 80%. The consideration is whether the defendant expresses his will, agrees to cooperate throughout the entire process, and pays the full amount at his own expense, regardless of occupation, wealth, or rank, "because what addicts need is treatment and has nothing to do with their occupation."
Jianqing's reform question asked why the public health system that increased control and supervision became, in Huang Guochang's words, "covering up ugliness" and "safetying the village"? Is he stupid and ignorant, or is he maliciously attacking the prosecutor and slandering the public health system?
The statement finally emphasized that Taiwan needs crime prevention policies and public health systems that are safer, have better medical and human rights, and can effectively reduce recidivism rates. Malicious slander, confusion, and attitudes that create opposition and hatred should not be tolerated. Any politician's speech that attempts to intensify hatred and divide society should be condemned, spurned, and "abandoned to the ashes of history."
☆One less drug means more health, Liberty Times reminds you to stay away from drugs☆
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Huang Guochang will issue further explanation or response to Jianqing’s statement on inspection and reform
Likely · Within days

The civil damages lawsuit for the neck-cutting case of a junior high school student in New Taipei City is still under trial. Defense lawyer Lin Yuexue questioned the victim's family's donation of 5 million yuan as a scholarship and bursary as a "deliberate transfer of assets." He publicly insulted the victim's family lawyer Li Huixuan for the second time as a "shame on the legal profession." This triggered netizens to search the bottom of the website, spoof his law firm, and flooded it with one-star negative reviews, and even renamed it "Lin Yuexue Parking Lot" on Google Maps.

The Xicheng District People's Court of Beijing released typical cases involving the protection of the rights and interests of the elderly and disclosed two fraud cases targeting the elderly: one involved health care fraud, in which the defendants Li and Yang attracted the elderly with free activities, health lectures, etc., and fabricated their medical conditions to induce them to buy products at high prices, defrauding 8 people of more than 170,000 yuan; the other was a collectibles fraud, in which the defendants Yue and Yang posed as intermediaries and buyers, charging traceability fees and other fees under the guise of high-priced repurchases, defrauding 6 people of more than 220,000 yuan. After the trial, the court held that the defendant's behavior constituted a crime of fraud, and sentenced nine people including Yang to fixed-term imprisonment of six months to four years and eight months. Yue and Yang were each sentenced to three years and nine months and fined 35,000 yuan. The defendant has fully refunded the compensation, and all the victims' economic losses have been recovered.

Prosecutor Liu Zhonglin of the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office was suspended from prosecution by the New Taipei District Prosecutor's Office for allegedly using the second-level drug amphetamine. During the period, he received addiction treatment for six months. This was the first case in the history of our country's judicial history that an active prosecutor was involved in drug abuse. When the Beijing Prosecutor's Office learned of the case, he made an inquiry, and Liu immediately resigned. He is currently on leave and suspended from his duties. The case letter was sent to the Prosecutor Evaluation Committee for individual case evaluation.

In 2022, a fire at the Meifu warehouse in Taoyuan lasted for 21 days, and Zhengxian Company filed a lawsuit for more than 43.86 million yuan in compensation because the goods were burned. The Taipei District Court held that the cause of the fire could not be confirmed, and there was no way to prove that it could be blamed on the manager. It ruled that Meifu Warehouse was exempt from compensation and the entire case could be appealed.

On the 15th, the Executive Yuan passed the draft amendments to some provisions of the Court Organization Law and related schedules drafted by the Judicial Yuan, and will be sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. This amendment aims to solve the huge caseload and manpower scheduling difficulties by adding the Judicial Affairs Office of the High Court, supervisors and assistant prosecutors of the High Prosecutor's Office, and integrating similar statutory posts to enhance the flexibility of manpower utilization.
According to the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the procuratorial organs prosecuted five officials including Yang Keqin, Zhu Xiaoqing, Wei Daiqing, Liu Yunzhou, and Ban Dairong in accordance with the law. The suspected crimes include accepting bribes, using influence to accept bribes, abuse of power, and corruption.