The TV debate will be launched on 10/31. Cao Xingcheng: Shen Boyang has won a big victory, but Jiang Wanan can be spared.

The televised debate for the Taipei mayoral election has been scheduled to take place on October 31. UMC founder Cao Xingcheng said on Facebook today (16th) that he dropped the ball yesterday and suggested that Shen Boyang cancel the debate with Chiang Wanan, triggering heated discussions online. What he means is that Shen Boyang has already won a complete victory in the "real debate"; as the saying goes, if you don't chase the enemy, you can let Jiang Wanan go. Otherwise, the dog will jump over the wall and spray out feces and urine, which may add an ugly regret to the high-level campaign that has been fragrant so far.

Cao Xingcheng said that real debate is like Major League Baseball, "You are at the bottom and I am at the top, pitching and hitting, open and aboveboard, and based on real skills." Fake debates are like gangster fights, "foul words, no rules, sticks thrown at each other, heads broken and bloody."

Please read on...

Cao Xingcheng pointed out that Shen Boyang has already been interviewed by Wang Weizhong, Li Siduan, Zhao Shaokang and other blue-camp media. These interviews are called dialogues, but they are actually debates. They threw a bunch of questions at Shen Boyang, but Shen did not dodge; he not only asked A and answered A, but also taught the other party a lesson. As a result, everyone who asked was convinced, the ratings skyrocketed, and the ocean trend rose as a result; it showed that Shen Boyang had won a great victory in the "True Debate" hosted by Blue Camp.

Cao Xingcheng said that on the other hand, Jiang Wanan only dared to find fake media people who were extremely red to fix the game and conduct "fake debates", and the ratings were also appalling. As far as the debate is concerned, compared with Shen Boyang, Jiang Wanan has "lost his pants".

Cao Xingcheng believes that Jiang Wanan recently saw that the election situation was not going well, so he was so anxious that he "asked a ghost to get the medicine list" and found all the bad guys in Bei City. They began to smear, poison, and discredit Shen Boyang (his father made red money), and even smear him violently (saying that he hit a classmate when he was in junior high school). Can a debate dominated by evil people be upright and abide by the rules?

Cao Xingcheng said that we know that asking A and answering B is illegal in a real debate. It's like you don't hit the ball thrown by the opponent, but you take the ball out of your pocket and throw it. Jiang Wanan always makes mistakes when speaking. Will he suddenly come back to his former glory and change his ways on the debate stage? Probably not possible.

Cao Xingcheng pointed out that some people opposed the cancellation of the debate and expected Shen Boyang to "electrically explode" Jiang Wanan during the debate. However, Shen Boyang refused to resort to attacks under extremely difficult circumstances. Now that he is sure of victory, he will of course be even more gentle with the enemy and shine with Buddha's light. Therefore, those who expect him to "electrically explode" his opponents may be disappointed.

Cao Xingcheng said that of course now that the debate on October 31 has been finalized, Shen Boyang will not avoid the battle. However, he believes that the "kung fu" temporarily passed on to Jiang Wanan by the evil villains on the other side must be full of malicious intent and overflowing with poison. Whether to require those over 18 years old to watch requires the competent authorities to consider and decide.