
國民黨立委李彥秀在反毒集會上稱社工人員將提供毒品治癮,引發社工界強烈反彈並要求公開道歉。台灣青年世代共好協會理事長張育萌質疑其言論並批評國民黨台北市長候選人蔣萬安護航,指出李彥秀拖延道歉,而由黨內其他成員代為道歉,質疑兩人是否仍認為自己無錯。
AI-generated summary
李彥秀在國民黨反毒集會上發表言論,稱社工人員將在社區提供毒品治癮,引發社工界強烈反彈,要求其公開道歉。張育萌為台灣青年世代共好協會理事長,對此發表質疑並批評國民黨相關人物。
張育萌質疑:「局面這麼難看,蔣萬安和李彥秀還是覺得自己永遠沒錯嗎?」(資料照)
國民黨立委李彥秀9日在國民黨反毒集會上表示,「以後社工人員會在社區提供吸毒的人毒品、毒藥來治癮」,造謠抹黑言論引發社工團體反彈,要求她公開向社工道歉。李彥秀對此表示她尊重社工,她是反對「建立社區中心,提供吸毒者毒品與乾淨的針頭,並導入社工機制予以協助」。台灣青年世代共好協會理事長張育萌對此質疑:「局面這麼難看,蔣萬安和李彥秀還是覺得自己永遠沒錯嗎?」
張育萌表示,李彥秀當時的原話是:「現在社區是大家每天在跳舞、運動的地方,以後變成社工人員在那邊,都是很多吸毒的人來給毒品、毒藥來治癮,這個對於社區來說是多大的危害。」此言也讓社工界直接氣炸,中華民國社工師公會全國聯合會,立刻發聲明:「社工不是毒品提供者!請停止誤導社會工作專業角色,讓成癮防治回歸科學與專業。」要求李彥秀公開向社工道歉。
請繼續往下閱讀...
張育萌提到,離譜的是李彥秀被罵之後開始問A答B,說自己擔任立法委員以來,「長期關注社工工時過長」,但她又硬要再講一次,說自己「堅決反對建立社區中心,提供吸毒者毒品與乾淨的針頭,並導入社工機制予以協助」。張育萌續指,李彥秀拖了兩天不道歉,結果出來道歉的,是昨天也在現場的國民黨新北市議員蔡淑君,張也質疑:「鬼話連篇的李彥秀自己不道歉,旁邊的國民黨議員先道歉。這什麼場面?」
張育萌表示,蔣萬安10日被問到此事時,還在護航李彥秀,說整起事件最源頭是沈伯洋2014年的文章。張育萌批評:「有夠可笑,蔣萬安現在出事就怪沈伯洋,這跟以前出事就怪賴清德有什麼不同?李彥秀現在是蔣萬安競選的發言人欸。請問蔣萬安,認同李彥秀這些言論嗎?」
張育萌提到,台北市社工職業工會直接預告,週一早上直攻李彥秀的南港服務處,親自要求她出面道歉,李彥秀最好祈禱,全台北社工剛好都不住在內湖南港,張質疑:「蔣萬安還要選嗎?」
最後張育萌也說:「蔣萬安找李彥秀當發言人,可以搞到選前47天,被台北市社工集體抗議。局面這麼難看,蔣萬安和李彥秀還是覺得自己永遠沒錯嗎?」
☆少一份毒品就多一份健康,自由時報提醒您遠離毒品☆
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
李彥秀將在社會壓力下公開向社工道歉
Likely · Within days
蔣萬安將進一步澄清其對李彥秀言論的立場
Possible · Within weeks

Hong Kong authorities awarded a HK$122 million lifeguard and first aid services contract to Spotlight Enterprises, a company previously found to have failed to provide required staffing at public swimming pools, raising concerns over the prudent use of public funds.

When Taichung Mayor Lu Xiuyan attended the launch of KMT Central Councilor Huang Xinhui's campaign headquarters, she said that President Lai Ching-te should pay attention to Legislative Yuan Hanguo-yu's remarks in the National Day speech that "fake democracy is true dictatorship" and refer to the practices of previous presidents to mediate disputes between the Executive Yuan and the Legislative Yuan and promote national prosperity and progress.

A months-long constitutional crisis in Malaysia's Negeri Sembilan state over the legitimacy of ruler Tuanku Muhriz versus his intended replacement Tunku Nadzaruddin has raised concerns about potential ripple effects on national monarchy and government systems, following the undangs' April 19 proclamation removing Muhriz over misconduct allegations.

Shen Boyang, the Taipei mayoral candidate of the Democratic Progressive Party, submitted a debate invitation to Taipei Mayor Chiang Wanan in person at the Wanhua Guangzhao Palace Dinner on the evening of the 10th, hoping that all four TV stations would hold the debate. Jiang Wanan stated that he would send people to participate in TVBS negotiations. After watching the relevant video, anchor Xu Guiya criticized Jiang Wanan for using words that he thought were smart and questioned that his debate arrangement was too biased. Shen Boyang also pointed out that Shen Boyang's request was to have FTV, Sanli, Mirror TV and TVBS all hold debates to increase the opportunities for confrontation on municipal issues.

President Lai Ching-te proposed the theme of "city on a hill, salt on the ground, light on the world" in his National Day speech, emphasizing the need to use pragmatic governance to promote salary increases, tax cuts, welfare benefits, and burden reductions so that people across the country can stand firm and live well. At the same time, the report covered the backlash caused by KMT legislator Li Yanxiu's alleged involvement in the supply of drugs by social workers, as well as the international trend of US sanctions against the International Criminal Court.

Xu Yuzhen, secretary-general of the KMT Legislative Yuan, criticized President Lai Ching-te for mentioning the "city on a hill" in his National Day speech but building a high wall against domestic dissent. He failed to resolve the administrative and legislative deadlock, people's livelihood difficulties and cross-strait crises. He only emphasized opening up to the outside world and ignored domestic democratic practices. He also pointed out that economic growth has not benefited all people and that cross-strait dialogue lacks specific paths. He called for substantive dialogue between the government and the opposition to resolve constitutional disputes and people's livelihood issues.