
Shi Fanggen said that he used his friend who was an engineer studying in the United States to connect Huida, which triggered a controversy over corporate governance and nepotism.
AI-generated summary
In an exclusive interview, Shi Fanggen said that he used Huang Renxun, an engineer friend, to trigger discussions about Huida's decision-making process.
Jiang Wanan's "privileged thinking" has become so ingrained that he didn't realize it.
Mrs. Jiang Wanan claimed that she was directly connected to Huang Renxun through personal relationships, and she was looking for trouble in the "nepotism" of the mayor's wife. The picture shows Jiang Wanan and his wife accepting an exclusive interview with Wang Weizhong.
After Shi Fanggen made the statement in an exclusive interview with Wang Weizhong that he "relyed on his engineering friends studying in the United States to connect him directly to Huang Renxun," according to technology expert Xu Meihua, Huida's internal employees were completely blown away by this statement, calling it "absolutely ridiculous."
Can an ordinary engineer defeat Jen-Hsun Huang based on personal connections? Judging from the operational logic of multinational technology giants, this rhetoric is full of loopholes.
Huida internally complained privately. They could probably guess which friend Shi Fangen was referring to, but given the employee's rank within Huida, it was impossible to directly contact or persuade Huang Renxun in the system.
Although Huang Renxun loves to visit night markets and has a people-friendly style, Huida is a technology multinational company with a market value of several trillion US dollars and the most rigorous system in the world.
Foreign businessmen and technology giants care most about corporate governance and institutional trust.
Any overseas headquarters site selection and investment with a scale of tens of billions is backed by rigorous legal, financial, real estate strategy and global supply chain assessment teams. How could it be possible for a grassroots engineer to pull the strings, and then Jiang Wanan could make Huida decide to settle in Taipei?
The "Taiwan general manager and professional team" are openly taken for granted. What offends people the most is that it tramples on corporate governance ethics and treats Huida as a "man-run company that can use the back door."
Huida has a formal Taiwan general manager and a professional public relations and government relations (GR) team in Taiwan. All formal contacts with the central government and local county and city heads, official documents and land evaluations are all run through standard channels.
Jiang Wanan and his wife claimed to have directly contacted Huang Renxun through personal relationships, which was tantamount to publicly slandering the management and executive team of Huida Taiwan Branch, implying that their professional assessment was not as good as "a phone call from the mayor and his wife."
The reason why Huida's headquarters originally gave priority to Taipei is because Taipei has the top software research and development talent pool, the industrial cluster effect of Internal Medicine and Nansoft, and the objective needs of foreign senior executives in terms of life, education and international standards.
Taipei was Huida's first choice. It wasn't "begged" by Jiang Wanan, let alone "brought in" by engineers.
But Jiang Wanan's thinking always stayed in the traditional "palace chamber" and "comprador network" of the Kuomintang.
When encountering major issues, we don't talk about systems, supporting facilities, and laws. Instead, we habitually want to show off to voters, "Look, we know high-level people in the United States, we have special channels, and we have a wide network of contacts."
Especially when these words came out of Shi Fanggen's mouth, wasn't this "nepotism" asking for trouble and involving the mayor's wife?
Jiang Wanan's family never understands what "avoidance of benefits" is, which is the same as the controversy over Jiang Deli's exchange of students at public expense.
A city chief with real governance depth should consider how to resolve the deadlock on Northco's land rights contract, how to coordinate water and electricity supply, and how to plan international bilingual schools and transportation connections, instead of talking about nepotism.
This controversy over claiming credit not only failed to add points to Jiang Wanan’s election, but instead aroused collective backlash and ridicule within the scientific and technological circles and foreign businessmen, adding to Jiang Wanan’s outsourcing record.

Information security scholar Li Zhongxian commented on Cai Kangyong being attacked by public opinion for attending the election campaign between Shen Boyang and Jiang Wanan. The author believes that Tsai Kang-yong is defending gay rights and the value of freedom and democracy, and uses Russell's river philosophy metaphor to emphasize the significance of public value that transcends personal interests and strives for dignity for others.

The author questioned Vladimir Putin at the Valdai Discussion Club regarding a potential summit with Xi Jinping and Donald Trump at the Apec forum in Shenzhen, and China's role in mediating the war in Ukraine.

Taiwan and the United Kingdom signed the "Science Innovation and Technology Cooperation Agreement" (SITA) in London on October 2, focusing on talent cultivation in satellite communications, silicon photonics, and semiconductors. This article recommends that the government should establish a long-term technology roadmap, strengthen two-way talent exchanges, and improve research security and intellectual property rights management mechanisms to enhance the substantive effectiveness of science and technology diplomacy.

China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced sanctions on Paraguay's Minister of Information, Communications and Technology Biade and Belize's Foreign Minister Fonseca on the grounds of maintaining diplomatic relations with Taiwan. This move triggered concern and controversy over the boundary between sovereign states’ diplomatic autonomy and major power political pressure.

Neue Zuricher Zeitung and Berliner Zeitung commented on the concept of a tripartite summit between China, the United States and Russia and Germany's foreign policy towards China and Asia, analyzing the feasibility of the new world order and the limitations of Germany's balanced diplomacy.

As Presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump prepare for upcoming Apec and G20 summits, business leaders urge for greater regulatory clarity. Current geopolitical uncertainty complicates long-term investment, contract signing, and production planning for global firms.