
The Fair Trade Commission judged that the Fair Trade Commission's action was justified for Broadcom's actions of forcing Samsung Electronics to sign a unilateral long-term contract by suspending the supply of smartphone components.
The Supreme Court confirmed the plaintiff's defeat in a lawsuit in which Broadcom appealed the 18.6 billion won fine it received from the Fair Trade Commission for forcing an unfair long-term contract against Samsung Electronics.
AI-generated summary
The Fair Trade Commission imposed a corrective order and fine in September 2023, saying Broadcom had forced Samsung Electronics to sign a long-term contract by suspending the supply of smartphone components.
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Lee Mi-ryeong = Broadcom, an American semiconductor company, filed a lawsuit seeking cancellation of a fine of approximately 18.6 billion won imposed by the Fair Trade Commission on suspicion of abuse of power against Samsung Electronics, but ultimately lost.
According to the legal community on the 2nd, the first division of the Supreme Court (Chief Justice Dae-yeop Cheon) confirmed the original trial's ruling on the 27th of last month in a lawsuit to cancel the correction order and fine payment order filed by Broadcom's U.S. headquarters and branches against the Fair Trade Commission.
In September 2023, the Fair Trade Commission imposed a corrective order and a fine of approximately 18.6 billion won on Broadcom, claiming that it violated the Fair Trade Act by abusing its trading position.
The Fair Trade Commission found that Broadcom pressured Samsung Electronics by stopping the supply of smartphone components and forced a long-term contract (LTA) that was unilaterally advantageous to the company.
In March 2020, Samsung Electronics signed a contract to purchase Broadcom's RFFE (components that improve communication frequency quality) and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth-related components for more than $760 million annually for three years from 2021, and to compensate Broadcom for the difference if the purchase amount falls short.
The Fair Trade Commission determined that in the process of concluding this contract, Broadcom unilaterally forced an unfavorable contract on Samsung by using unfair means, such as suspending purchase order approval and suspending product shipment and production.
At the time, Broadcom was the world's No. 1 operator with an overwhelming share in the RFFE market, and Samsung Electronics had no choice but to listen to Broadcom's unilateral demands to prevent production disruptions for products such as the Galaxy S20 that had just been released.
The Fair Trade Commission estimated that the additional costs paid by Samsung Electronics due to restrictions on component selection amounted to at least $160 million (approximately KRW 213.7 billion based on the exchange rate at the time). Samsung Electronics claimed that it suffered damages worth a total of $326.3 million (about 437.5 billion won).
Broadcom disobeyed the Fair Trade Commission's decision and filed a lawsuit in November 2023.
However, in May of this year, the Seoul High Court ruled that the plaintiff lost, saying that the Fair Trade Commission's fine was justified.
The Seoul High Court acknowledged that Broadcom forced the conclusion of a long-term contract through the highly unusual means of arbitrarily stopping the supply of components, and that it clearly recognized that the contract was concluded against the will of the other party.
In addition, it was determined that the contents of the long-term contract were unilaterally disadvantageous to Samsung Electronics and did not comply with normal trading practices, and that Broadcom acted in this way to prevent it from adopting parts from its competitors.
Broadcom appealed this ruling, but the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.
The Fair Trade Commission's decision has the same effect as the first trial ruling, so if the parties object, it will be confirmed through the Seoul High Court and Supreme Court rulings.

South Korea's Supreme Court upheld an 18.6 billion won ($13.9 million) antitrust fine against Broadcom for abusing bargaining power to force Samsung into an unfavorable supply agreement.

South Korea's Supreme Court upheld an 18.6 billion-won fine on U.S. chipmaker Broadcom for forcing Samsung Electronics to sign a disadvantageous long-term parts supply agreement.

South Korea's finance minister met with Hyundai Motor Group's chief to discuss electric vehicle industry development and domestic production tax incentives ahead of an industry roundtable.

Hanjin Group Chairman Cho Won-tae decided to purchase an additional 325,000 shares of Hanjin KAL common stock worth 37.05 billion won to strengthen responsible management. This is a move that comes amid Hoban Group's recent purchase of additional shares and reporting of a business combination to the Fair Trade Commission, and is attracting attention as a way to defend management rights.

Samsung Electronics will participate as an official wireless communications partner in the 2026 Youth Olympic Games held in Dakar, Senegal for the first time on the African continent, showcasing Galaxy technology and expanding local marketing.

POSCO Holdings announced on the 2nd that it recorded an operating profit of 940 billion won in the third quarter of this year, a 47.9% increase compared to the same period last year, thanks to the recovery of profitability in the steel sector. This figure exceeds market expectations.