![[Updating] “I’m sorry for the prosecution” Prosecutor questions the defendant “With a simple sense of justice in my heart”](/api/img?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimgopt.asahi.com%2Fogp%2FAS20261014004890_comm.jpg&w=1200&q=72&f=webp)
The sixth trial of Daisuke Tabuchi (54), the current prosecutor of the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, who was accused of assaulting and abusing a special public servant for yelling, ``I don't care for the prosecution,'' during an interrogation by the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office's Special Investigation Department, began at 10 a.m. on the 16th at the Osaka District Court, during which the defendant spoke about his beliefs and past history during questioning.
AI-generated summary
The Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office's special investigation department has indicted prosecutor Daisuke Tabuchi on charges of assaulting and abusing a special public servant, for allegedly yelling, ``Don't be a prosecutor!'' during an interrogation of a man who was the manager of a real estate company.
The 6th trial of prosecutor Daisuke Tabuchi (54), currently the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, who was charged with assaulting and abusing a special public servant for yelling, ``I don't care for the prosecution,'' during an interrogation by the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office's Special Investigation Department, began at 10 a.m. on the 16th at the Osaka District Court. On this day, the defendant will be questioned for the first time. What will the defendant say when he takes the stand as an active prosecutor? I will tell you about the main exchanges.
10:00 Court opening
The presiding judge announced the opening of the trial, and the examination of evidence from the previous trial was resumed.
10:20 “I want the record to show that I acknowledged the facts and decided to speak out.”
Audio from a video recording of Tabuchi interrogating a man who was the manager of a real estate company was played in court.
Defendant Tabuchi calmly told the man, ``I want the record to show that I have acknowledged the facts and decided to speak out.I want to set that tone,'' and ``I don't think the issues have been completely resolved, but I want to work together and work together to resolve them.''
11:15 Defendant's questioning begins
The questioning of the defendant began. The defense attorney will ask questions and begin by checking your background.
Defense attorney: “Why did you choose to take the bar exam?”
Defendant: ``When I was in high school, I consulted my father about my career path, and he told me, ``If you're into the liberal arts, why not aim to become a lawyer?'' That's when I decided to apply.''
Defense attorney: “Why did you choose to become a prosecutor?”
Defendant: ``I think the big thing was that I was able to work with a simple sense of justice, without being influenced by money or profit and loss accounts.''
11:25 The credo of interrogation is “to respect the other person and listen to what they have to say”
Defense attorney: “How many people have you interrogated since becoming a prosecutor?”
Defendant: ``I don't remember the exact number, but I think we have interrogated several hundred suspects and witnesses.''
Defense attorney: “What is an interrogation?”
Defendant: ``It's an investigation activity that elicits statements that clarify the facts from the person you want to interrogate. That's what I thought.''
Defense attorney: “Do you have any beliefs when conducting interrogations?”
Defendant: ``There are differences in the positions of the prosecutor and the suspect, but try to treat the other person as the same person as possible, respect the other person, and listen carefully to what the other person has to say. Get to know the person of the other person well.I was conscious of paying attention to these things.''
12:00 “If you continue to make unreasonable statements, you will be severely pursued.”
He asked about the status of the investigation into the embezzlement case.
Defense attorney: “When did you become seriously involved in the case (investigation)?”
Defendant: “Around late November 2019”
Defense attorney: “Did (the man who was the manager of a real estate company) understand the flow of loans, etc., and did you recognize him as an important person?”
Defendant: “Yes.”
Defense attorney: “Did you conduct any voluntary interrogation (before the man was arrested)?”
Defendant: “It happened about twice. It was a denial.”
Defense attorney: “Did you conduct a rigorous investigation through a voluntary investigation?”
Defendant: ``I didn't pursue him as harshly as I thought he would. There wasn't enough evidence yet.I carefully listened to the man's excuses, examined their consistency with the evidence and their rationality, and if the man continued to make unreasonable statements, I was thinking of showing him the evidence and, depending on the situation, pursuing him harshly.''
12:15 Adjournment
The trial was adjourned.
13:40 Restart
After a break, the trial resumed.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The defendant's questioning will continue at the next court hearing.
Very likely · Within weeks

On the 16th, the government approved a bill to revise the Police Duties Execution Act, which will enable police to remotely access criminals' smartphones and obtain information through ``remote analysis,'' in order to prevent criminal damage caused by anonymous and mobile criminal groups. The law requires permission from a judge and requires the crime to be serious and it would be extremely difficult to collect information by other means. If passed, it is expected to be implemented as early as next year. Diet deliberations are expected to include discussions from the perspective of communication secrecy and privacy protection.

Regarding the case in which Hyogo Prefecture Governor Motohiko Saito and others were accused of violating the Local Public Service Act, and the Kobe District Public Prosecutors Office did not indict them, the Kobe Second Public Prosecution Committee announced a resolution stating that the non-prosecution decision was "appropriate." The accuser, Professor Hiroyuki Kamiwaki, has expressed that he is not convinced.
![[Updating] “Prosecution is boring” Prosecutor begins questioning defendant Osaka District Court](/api/img?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimgopt.asahi.com%2Fogp%2FAS20261014004890_comm.jpg&w=320&q=72&f=webp)
The 6th trial of Daisuke Tabuchi (54), the current prosecutor of the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, was held at the Osaka District Court, where he was charged with assaulting and abusing a special public servant for yelling, ``I don't care for the prosecution!'' during an interrogation by the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office's Special Investigation Department, and during the first questioning of the defendant, he spoke about his beliefs during the interrogation and why he aimed to become a prosecutor.

The Sendai High Court will hand down the judgment of the appeal court in the Tsushima lawsuit following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident on the 16th. The plaintiffs, approximately 600 residents of the Tsushima district of Namie Town, are suing the national government and TEPCO for restoration of the original condition and compensation for damages. Although the Supreme Court denied the state's responsibility in 2022, new issues have been raised, and attention is focused on reviewing the judicial decision.
![[Comprehensive understanding] Smartphone “remote analysis” bill Why is it being discussed now?](/api/img?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimgopt.asahi.com%2Fogp%2FAS20261016000190_comm.jpg&w=320&q=72&f=webp)
The National Police Agency has announced a policy to introduce ``remote analysis,'' a method of obtaining information by remotely intruding into criminals' smartphones, in order to prevent the spread of damage such as special fraud and robbery and murder by anonymous and mobile criminal groups. A bill to revise the Police Officer Duties Execution Act has been approved by the Cabinet and will be debated in the Diet. The amount of damage will reach an all-time high of approximately 325.7 billion yen in 2025, and the aim is to overcome the situation where it is difficult to identify the instructor through cooperation from telecommunications carriers and analysis of seized devices.

The Supreme Court announced on the 15th that a failure had occurred in the online filing system for civil trials, ``mints.'' We are calling for written submissions as an alternative method when the system is unavailable, and this is the first time that an alternative method due to a failure has been presented since the full digitalization in May.