
The Center under the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs promotes free viewing of the movie 'Assassin(s)' and clashes with National Power Party lawmaker Kim Jae-seop's police investigation and sensitive issues.
AI-generated summary
As the Center under the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs promoted free viewing of the movie 'Assassin(s)', which deals with the attempted assassination of President Park Chung-hee, controversy over distortion of history arose.
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Ahn Jung-hoon = On the 6th, the ruling and opposition parties fought at the National Assembly's Political Affairs Committee audit over the fact that the Gyeonggi Northern Gyeonggi Veterans' Support Center under the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs promoted the movie 'Assassin(s)' as a free weekly movie for discharged veterans.
The main opposition party, the People Power Party, pointed out that it was inappropriate to use budget to promote free viewing of a movie with controversy over distortion of facts, but the ruling Democratic Party of Korea countered with the logic that there was no problem as there was no particular distortion of facts.
Rep. Cho Jung-hoon of the People Power Party pointed out, “The decision to use the national budget to show this film to veterans and their families is a completely different issue from freedom of expression,” and added, “When the Ministry of Veterans Affairs selects a film, it must have veterans’ value.”
Rep. Song Eon-seok of the same party also criticized the center's original plan for quoting the synopsis of the movie to write promotional text, saying, "It was promoted in the name of the Ministry of Veterans Affairs. Does this make sense?"
'Assassin(s)' is a film about the attempted assassination of President Park Chung-hee and the shooting death of First Lady Yuk Young-soo that occurred in 1974.
Controversy over historical distortion arose over a scene in the play where some characters put forward a hypothesis that the 'higher ranks' of the Central Intelligence Agency may have been behind the story, based on diplomatic relations with Japan at the time.
Representative Han Min-soo of the Democratic Party said, "As the director revealed, it was created with cinematic imagination based on various records related to the incident at the time with the motif of a historical event that occurred in 1974," and added, "I hope the People Power Party members will not attack."
Rep. Lee Kang-il of the same party emphasized, “There is absolutely no claim that Moon Se-gwang (the sniper in the movie) did not kill anyone,” and added, “There is nothing that changes history or facts.”
On the first day of the National Assembly inspection, the ruling and opposition parties also engaged in a war of nerves over the police investigation of People Power Party lawmaker Kim Jae-seop, a member of the Political Affairs Committee.
Rep. Kim was sued for raising suspicions regarding a business trip to Cancun, Mexico, during former Seoul mayoral candidate Jeong Won-oh's tenure as mayor of Seongdong-gu, and appeared at the police that day for investigation.
Rep. Park Seong-hoon of the People Power Party criticized, “Is there any precedent in the constitutional history of the Republic of Korea for investigating an active member as a suspect on the first day of the National Assembly audit?” and “This only appears to be a simple and base action to block and silence the opposition party.”
In response, Democratic Party lawmaker Han Min-soo referred to media reports that Rep. Kim first approached the police about his attendance schedule and asked, "The police say the National Assembly member will not be able to attend on the first day of the National Assembly inspection, but won't they change that?"

While the Supreme Court's disciplinary proceedings against Chief Judge Ji Gwi-yeon, who is suspected of serving alcohol, are scheduled to proceed, a battle broke out between ruling and opposition party lawmakers and the Director of the Court Administration, Noh Kyung-pil, over the rejection of the warrant by the Corruption Investigation Office and the 'at-home warrant' during the National Assembly Legislative and Judiciary Committee's audit of government affairs.

The government plans to set a special period of 2 to 3 years for excluding and suspending disposition through the Special Measures Act for violations of the Farmland Act that are not speculation. Yoon Won-seup, Director of Agricultural Policy at the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, announced this at a National Assembly debate, and enactment will be promoted within the year.

Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae appeared at the Supreme Court's government audit on the 6th and refused to testify on the issue of re-nomination of Supreme Court Justices, but made a concise statement for six minutes, saying that the National Assembly and the President cannot be involved in the Supreme Court Justice's recommendation and that this is an unconstitutional measure.

China proposed an extensive schedule, including meetings with businessmen and college students, ahead of President Xi Jinping's state visit to the United States, but the United States reportedly rejected many of them citing the principle of reciprocity and national security concerns.

The three May 18 organizations and the Memorial Foundation called for the immediate withdrawal of three amendments to the May 18 related laws proposed by People Power Party lawmaker Lee Jin-sook and others. Organizations pointed out that the amendment could cause secondary damage by limiting the scope of May 18 and mandating the disclosure of the list.
Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae directly criticized the National Assembly's interference in the nomination of Supreme Court justices during the National Assembly's audit, calling it an unconstitutional measure that goes against the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary. It was also revealed that the constitutional basis for the Blue House's refusal to request re-nomination of Supreme Court Justice candidates was not clear.