
AI-generated summary
In Toshima Ward, with the increase in hotels and private lodging near Ikebukuro Station, the abandonment of unnecessary suitcases has become a problem. Approximately 290 cases of neglect were confirmed in FY2025.
On the 11th, Tokyo's Toshima Ward, which has been experiencing a number of illegal dumpings of suitcases in areas such as Ikebukuro Station, where hotels and private lodging are concentrated, announced plans to revise its ordinance prohibiting smoking and littering on the streets, and to make those who dump suitcases subject to fines. According to the ward, this is believed to be the first such initiative in the country.
According to the ward, approximately 290 abandoned suitcases were found on the streets in the ward in fiscal 2025. It is possible that travelers may have thrown away items they no longer needed after purchasing new items. Because the contents cannot be seen from the outside, 911 may be called as a suspicious item.
Under the current ordinance, littering includes plastic bottles, cans, and cigarette butts, and stipulates fines of up to 20,000 yen. The ordinance will be revised to include suitcases and prohibit littering. The plan is to focus on areas around Ikebukuro Station and Otsuka Station, and to impose fines of up to 20,000 yen on violators in those areas. The plan is to propose the revised bill at the ward assembly meeting in February next year, with the aim of having it come into force in April.
So far, the ward has distributed flyers in Japanese, English, Chinese, and Korean to stations and accommodation facilities within the ward, calling for people to stop illegally dumping suitcases. Measures have also been taken, such as a large-scale visual display around Ikebukuro Station calling for people not to leave the buildings unattended.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Submission of ordinance amendment bill to the ward assembly in February 2025
Very likely · Within months
Ordinance enforcement in April 2025
Likely · Within months

The Supreme Court's Grand Bench ruled on the 11th that the maximum vote disparity of 3.13 times in the July 2025 House of Councilors election was "unconstitutional." The appeal to invalidate the election was rejected. The Diet will be forced to take measures to correct disparities.

The Ministry of Justice announced the 2026 bar exam results on the 11th. Of the 1,595 successful applicants, the percentage of women was 31.8%, the highest since the current system began. The pass rate was 41.2%, the same level as last year.

On the 11th, the Supreme Court's Grand Bench ruled that the ``1-vote disparity'' of up to 3.13 times in the House of Councilors election held in July last year was unconstitutional, stating that ``there was a state of gross inequality.'' The claim to invalidate the election was rejected. This is the first time that a House of Councilors election has been found to be unconstitutional after the introduction of combined constituencies.

The United Kingdom, France, Australia, Canada, South Korea, and other countries are broadcasting Supreme Court and Constitutional Court hearings live on the Internet. The purpose of the principle of public openness of trials stipulated in Article 82 of the Japanese Constitution is to check the judiciary by the sovereign, and if the Supreme Court's arguments are made available online, they can also serve as material for public scrutiny. We spoke to Tetsuro Hirano (57), a former judge and professor at Ritsumeikan University Law School.

It has been revealed that the Fukuoka Prefectural Police visually checked the "suspect notebooks" of arrested and detained suspects during property inspections. Notes submitted by defense attorneys are said to be protected by the right of confidential communication, but prefectural police checked for several seconds to make sure there were no dangerous objects or instructions to destroy evidence. The company said it has reviewed its operations and taken into consideration human rights and security needs.

On the 10th, the Fukuoka District Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim in a lawsuit filed against six expressway companies and the government by a man who had his application for an ETC personal card rejected because he was affiliated with an organized crime group. The plaintiffs argued that the expressway is a public property, and that not being able to use it just because they are affiliated with an organized crime group constitutes unreasonable discrimination.