
AI-generated summary
Daisuke Tabuchi is accused of assaulting and abusing a public servant for abusing the other person during an interrogation. The content of this trial is to question the internal understanding of the prosecutor's office at the time.
The fifth trial of Daisuke Tabuchi (54), a prosecutor accused of assaulting and abusing a special public servant, was held on the 13th at the Osaka District Court after he insulted his opponent by saying things like ``Don't mess with the prosecution'' during an interrogation by the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office's special investigation department. The defense read aloud the records of his three superiors, including then Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office Tadashi, and emphasized that they did not view the interrogation as a problem.
The defense read out the transcripts of the three people who were interviewed, including the designated prosecutor's attorney. Yasuhiro Tanabe, the chief public prosecutor at the time, replied, ``I was satisfied after receiving an explanation from the special investigation department and the general examination prosecutor (who checks whether the investigation is appropriate) that there was no problem.'' Deputy Chief Public Prosecutor Machiko Yamamoto (same) said, ``I thought it was inappropriate and excessive, but I don't think it was a criminal act at all,'' and Special Investigations Director Hiroyuki Yamashita (same) said, ``I didn't think it was a compliment, but I don't know if it will immediately affect the arbitrariness or credibility.''
At a press conference after the court closed, defense attorney Naoya Mori explained, ``I submitted this because it is evidence of how the investigation was handled within the public prosecutor's office.'' In his opening statement at the previous trial on the 6th, he pointed out, ``None of the three, including the prosecutor, offered to confirm the interrogation that day.''

The Osaka District Court decided on the 14th to hold the second trial on the 27th for defendant Kentaro Kitagawa, who was charged with semi-forced sexual intercourse for sexually assaulting a subordinate while he was a public prosecutor at the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office. The defendant plans to maintain his innocence, and the verdict is scheduled to be handed down on March 12 next year.

Appellate arguments in a lawsuit challenging the unconstitutionality of uniform restrictions on voting rights for prisoners have been held and concluded in the Grand Bench of the Supreme Court. The first constitutional judgment is expected to be presented by the end of this year.

The family of a 19-year-old Shikoku Electric Power Transmission and Distribution employee who fell to his death from a power transmission tower in Kamikatsu Town, Tokushima Prefecture, has announced their intention to sue the company, alleging power harassment in the workplace. The company aims to uncover the truth in court, arguing that the company's explanation of the investigation was insufficient.

The Tokyo District Court sentenced Shion Miyanishi, who was charged with attempted murder and other crimes, to nine years in prison in the March 2025 slashing of NHK Party leader Takashi Tachibana in Kasumigaseki, Tokyo. The presiding judge pointed out that the crime was highly dangerous and extremely malicious.

In a lawsuit involving a website that imitated the ``band score'' of a music band's songs and made it available for free, the Supreme Court on the 9th confirmed for the first time that the site was liable under civil law for infringing business interests even if it was an expression that was not protected by copyright, and the second-instance judgment was finalized, ordering the site to pay approximately 169 million yen.

In 2022, a female student who was the captain of the softball team committed suicide at Seto City, Aichi Prefecture's private Seiyou High School. The bereaved family has filed a lawsuit in the Nagoya District Court against Nanzan Gakuen and the former advisor, demanding approximately 47 million yen in damages, alleging inappropriate guidance by the former advisor and neglect by the school.