
台南蘇姓男子騎機車經路口遭警方舉發未停讓行人,被罰1200元記3點。蘇男堅稱與行人距離超過4公尺符合免罰標準,警方稱模擬僅3公尺。高雄高等行政法院認為關鍵的「3公尺執法紅線」未釐清仍有爭議,撤銷原判決發回更審。
AI-generated summary
蘇男於2023年11月10日上午11時許,騎重機車行經台南市某路口時,遭員警攔查舉發。交通局隨後依《道路交通管理處罰條例》開罰1200元、記3點並應接受安全講習。
機車「未停讓行人」取締距離各說各話,法院判撤單更裁。示意圖。(資料照)
機車「未停讓行人」差幾公分罰單差很大!台南蘇姓男子前年騎機車行經路口,警認定未禮讓行人當場攔查,被台南市交通局裁罰1200元、記3點並應接受安全講習。蘇男不服打官司,堅稱當時與行人距離超過4公尺,符合免罰標準;警方則稱模擬僅3公尺。高雄高等行政法院認為,關鍵的「3公尺執法紅線」未釐清仍有爭議,判決撤銷原判決,發回更審。
判決指出,蘇男於2023年11月10日上午11時許,騎重機車行經台南市某路口時,遭員警攔查舉發。交通局隨後依《道路交通管理處罰條例》開罰。但蘇男喊冤提起行政訴訟,主張機車進入行人穿越道時,與行人的實際距離已超過4公尺,遠大於警政署規定的3公尺(約3個枕木紋)取締標準,警方根本是誤罰。
請繼續往下閱讀...
不過,舉發員警在答辯報告中反駁,依現場模擬結果,兩者距離約為3公尺至3.4公尺,剛好踩在違規紅線上,雙方各執一詞。
法院審理後指出,雙方對於「實際距離、相對位置、行進狀態」存在截然不同的主張,原審並未釐清,且警政署「取締認定原則」在本案中的作用也有待查明。在事實未釐清前,無從逕為判決,因此裁定廢棄原判決,發回重新審理,讓這起千元罰單官司出現大逆轉。
不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎 點我下載APP 按我看活動辦法
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
發回更審後,法院將重新評估現場距離證據及警方模擬結果的可靠性
Likely · Within weeks

Relying on the MIP one-stop intellectual property protection platform, the Minhang District Procuratorate successfully cracked down on counterfeit "Bee Flower" shampoo cases and brokered settlements. At the same time, it launched aviation economic prosecutorial services in the "Rocket Star City" commercial aerospace industry cluster to provide full-chain intellectual property legal protection for regional science and technology innovation enterprises.

A Croatian court approved the extradition of a Ukrainian man wanted in Germany for the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline explosions. The suspect's lawyer plans to appeal.

The 27th meeting of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People's Congress of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region voted on the 24th to adopt the "Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Anti-Domestic Violence Regulations". The regulations clarify the concept of domestic violence and refine it into types such as physical, personal freedom, mental and economic control, and will be officially implemented on December 1.

Last year, celebrity Zhao Junshuo accused American professor Chen Shifen (Ong Darui) of plagiarizing his article on Facebook. Chen Shifen filed a lawsuit for aggravated defamation, and Zhao was found not guilty at first instance. After the case was appealed, the high court of second instance found that Zhao Junshuo had subjectively performed reasonable verification obligations and had no subjective malice. It rejected the appeal and ruled that Zhao Junshuo was not guilty.

YouTuber Cheap was sued by Leihu Technology for NT$100 million for discussing the business dispute between Lotte and National Bank. On the 23rd, the Taipei District Court ruled that Leihu Technology lost the lawsuit and Cheap was exempted from compensation. Cheap issued a response today (24th), saying congratulations to the court for the certification.

After an investigation, the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office concluded that the "Principal Lyle" promotional drama launched by the KMT's New Media Department and the trailer for the TV series "Zero Day Attack" were different in the core creative demands. The controversial scenes did not constitute alteration or plagiarism. It found that the defendants Wei Chunyou, Yang Zhiyi and the KMT were not guilty enough, and they were punished without prosecution.