北京互联网法院通报涉平台治理网络服务合同纠纷审理情况,明确虚构故事、猎奇情节诱导关注属违规行为。
主播金某因在直播中编造“老宅寻宝”和“太岁星君”等封建迷信故事、诱导粉丝关注,被平台无限期封禁直播权限。金某起诉维权后,北京互联网法院一审判决驳回其诉讼请求,明确该行为属于违规,平台处罚合法合理。
AI-generated summary
北京互联网法院召开新闻发布会,通报涉平台治理网络服务合同纠纷审理情况并发布典型案例。
中新网北京11月11日电(记者 刘越)编造“老宅寻宝”的离奇故事、渲染“太岁星君”等封建迷信元素、用煽动性语言诱导粉丝关注,这种靠“讲故事”博流量的直播套路合理吗?
11月10日,北京互联网法院召开新闻发布会,通报涉平台治理网络服务合同纠纷审理情况。会上发布的典型案例中,主播金某因“借消极不实内容吸睛”被平台无限期封禁直播权限,起诉维权被驳回。这一判决为直播内容治理树立了鲜明导向。
案情显示,原告金某在被告某科技公司运营的平台开通直播账号,通过“连线粉丝”讲故事的形式吸引平台用户关注。2025年12月,原告在某场直播中通过连线粉丝,故事涉及“太岁星君”等封建迷信元素,并用煽动语言诱导关注。涉案账号于一个月内被举报160余次,并多次因同类违规被罚。平台遂以“借消极不实内容吸睛”为由,无限期封禁涉案账号直播权限、观众连线权限。原告主张未在直播中传播消极不实信息,请求法院判令解除封禁措施。
法院审理认为,原告直播过程中发布涉及猎奇情节,讲述虚构的寻宝故事,并就故事发展诱导粉丝关注账号及直播间,可以认定存在“借消极不实内容吸睛”等为平台规则所禁止的行为。原告此前多次已有同类违规行为,已被平台警告和处罚。被告依据平台规则对涉案账号采取无限期封禁直播权限及观众连线权限等处罚,具有事实依据,符合法律规定和协议约定。综合在案证据,处罚措施与违约行为的性质、情节及后果相适应,并未超出合理限度。最终,法院判决驳回原告的诉讼请求。
该案明确了以虚构故事、猎奇情节诱导观众关注,属于直播内容治理中的违规情形,平台可以依规处置。为引流涨粉,捏造人物身世、虚构故事情节等行为,不仅违背诚实信用原则,更与社会主义核心价值观背道而驰。法院提示,平台应加强直播内容审查,提升直播平台的精神气质和文化力量,推动网络直播业态健康可持续发展。

The Beijing Financial Court announced the application of special representative litigation procedures to the Oriental Securities false statement case. The China Securities Small and Medium Investor Service Center has been authorized to participate in litigation on behalf of investors. The China Securities Regulatory Commission has stated that it will support this move to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of investors and pursue legal liability.

Lin Qiyun, director of the Accounting Department of the Ministry of Finance, said in Beijing that after the completion of the revision of the Accounting Law and the Certified Public Accountant Law, the "15th Five-Year Plan" period will focus on improving supporting systems, combating financial fraud, and improving the quality of accounting and auditing, and insisting on equal emphasis on supervision and development.

A US federal judge rejected the BBC's bid to dismiss Donald Trump's multibillion-dollar defamation and consumer protection lawsuit over a deceptively edited documentary regarding the January 6 Capitol riot.
A trading company used edited and recorded videos during a live broadcast to pretend to be a real-time live broadcast, and was permanently banned from the platform and then sued to defend its rights. The Beijing Internet Court found that the platform's punishment was legal and well-founded, and rejected all the plaintiff's claims, sounding a wake-up call for the live broadcast industry.

China's Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security jointly released five typical cases of punishing money laundering crimes in accordance with the law on November 11, covering the use of financial intelligence, underground banks and shell company money laundering, etc., demonstrating the effectiveness of public prosecutors' coordinated efforts to combat money laundering crimes.
The Beijing Internet Court recently concluded an Internet service contract dispute. Anchor Li claimed that tea and probiotics can treat autism, tinnitus and eye protection during a live broadcast, but the platform permanently closed the product sharing function. The court held that it constituted false publicity and ruled to reject the plaintiff's claim.