
Demonstrate the effectiveness of the procuratorate and public security agencies in cooperating to combat money laundering crimes
China's Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security jointly released five typical cases of punishing money laundering crimes in accordance with the law on November 11, covering the use of financial intelligence, underground banks and shell company money laundering, etc., demonstrating the effectiveness of public prosecutors' coordinated efforts to combat money laundering crimes.
AI-generated summary
In recent years, China's procuratorial organs and public security organs have adhered to "one case, double investigation", coordinated to punish money laundering crimes in accordance with the law, and continuously improved the quality and efficiency of handling money laundering cases.
China News Service, Beijing, November 11 (Reporters Zhang Su and Guo Chaokai) China's Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security jointly released typical cases of punishing money laundering crimes in accordance with the law on the 11th, demonstrating the effectiveness of the procuratorate and public security agencies in jointly combating money laundering crimes.
There are 5 typical cases in this batch, involving the use of financial intelligence, individual prosecution of money laundering crimes, punishment of unit money laundering crimes, crackdown on underground banks, crackdown on and management of money laundering crimes using shell companies, etc. The overall crime characteristics include diverse money laundering methods, complex crime situations, and huge amounts of money involved.
A prosecutor from the Economic Crime Prosecution Office of the Supreme People's Procuratorate stated that the selected cases focused on elaborating on difficult issues in judicial case handling such as accurately distinguishing money laundering crimes from predicate crimes, illegal business crimes and money laundering crimes, and strengthening the review of evidence throughout the chain, which will help case investigators accurately grasp the identification criteria for money laundering crimes.
In recent years, the procuratorial organs and public security organs have adhered to the "one case, double investigation" and jointly punished money laundering crimes in accordance with the law. They have continuously improved the quality and efficiency of handling money laundering cases through penetrating examination of complex money laundering behaviors, traceability of money laundering funds, and full-chain crackdowns.
The "Li Moulei Money Laundering Case" released this time revealed the shady story of shell companies acting as "funding channels" for fund-raising fraud. In more than a year, the criminals registered 14 companies with no actual business operations to collect "handling fees", assisted in the transfer of more than 2.9 billion yuan in fund-raising fraud, and made illegal profits of more than 24 million yuan. They were eventually sentenced to seven years and six months in prison for money laundering.
The Supreme People's Procuratorate stated that when handling illegal fund-raising cases, the case-handling agencies must focus on strengthening the substantive examination of the registration background, operating status, and capital expenditures of the affiliated companies involved in the case where the funds are transferred quickly and frequently between different companies. At the same time, cross-reference of multi-department data is effectively used to determine whether the essence of fund flows between companies is generated by real business activities or provides a money laundering channel.
This batch of typical cases is also characterized by strengthening multi-party collaboration in the field of anti-money laundering. In the "Wang Moufang Money Laundering Case", the procuratorial organs and public security organs, together with the People's Bank of China and other anti-money laundering obligations, continued to improve the connection mechanism between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice in the field of anti-money laundering, strengthened the timely sharing, transfer and joint research and judgment of anti-money laundering information and intelligence, dug deep into clues of money laundering crimes, and achieved full-chain traceability and integrated crackdown on money laundering.

The Beijing Financial Court announced the application of special representative litigation procedures to the Oriental Securities false statement case. The China Securities Small and Medium Investor Service Center has been authorized to participate in litigation on behalf of investors. The China Securities Regulatory Commission has stated that it will support this move to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of investors and pursue legal liability.

Lin Qiyun, director of the Accounting Department of the Ministry of Finance, said in Beijing that after the completion of the revision of the Accounting Law and the Certified Public Accountant Law, the "15th Five-Year Plan" period will focus on improving supporting systems, combating financial fraud, and improving the quality of accounting and auditing, and insisting on equal emphasis on supervision and development.

A US federal judge rejected the BBC's bid to dismiss Donald Trump's multibillion-dollar defamation and consumer protection lawsuit over a deceptively edited documentary regarding the January 6 Capitol riot.
Anchor Jin was banned from the platform indefinitely for fabricating feudal superstitious stories such as "Treasure Hunting in Old Houses" and "Tai Sui Xingjun" during the live broadcast to induce fans' attention. After Jin sued to defend his rights, the first-instance judgment of the Beijing Internet Court rejected his claim, clarifying that the behavior was a violation and the platform's punishment was legal and reasonable.
A trading company used edited and recorded videos during a live broadcast to pretend to be a real-time live broadcast, and was permanently banned from the platform and then sued to defend its rights. The Beijing Internet Court found that the platform's punishment was legal and well-founded, and rejected all the plaintiff's claims, sounding a wake-up call for the live broadcast industry.
The Beijing Internet Court recently concluded an Internet service contract dispute. Anchor Li claimed that tea and probiotics can treat autism, tinnitus and eye protection during a live broadcast, but the platform permanently closed the product sharing function. The court held that it constituted false publicity and ruled to reject the plaintiff's claim.