
新北市國中生割頸案民事損害賠償訴訟仍在審理中,辯方律師林月雪質疑被害家屬將500萬元愛心捐款作為獎助學金是『故意轉移資產』,並二度公開辱罵被害家屬律師李惠暄為『法律人之恥』,引發網友肉搜起底、惡搞其所屬律師事務所並狂刷一星負評,甚至在Google地圖上將其改名為『林月雪停車場』。
AI-generated summary
本案源於2023年耶誕節發生的新北市國中生割頸命案,林女因細故與同學起爭執,郭姓少年持刀刺死楊姓同學,林姓少女則被認定涉教唆犯案,兩人分別遭判處12年、11年徒刑定讞。
全台關注的新北國中生割頸案,民事損害賠償訴訟目前仍於法院審理中,涉案郭姓少年(乾哥)的法律扶助基金會委任律師林月雪對被害者家屬提出多項質疑,還二度發文攻擊楊家委任律師李惠暄,爭議言論引發網友撻伐,網友在砲轟之餘也對林月雪所屬的律師事務所狂刷負評,目前在Google地圖上也被惡搞改名為「林月雪停車場」。
本案源於2023年耶誕節發生的新北市國中生割頸命案,林女因細故與同學起爭執,郭姓少年持刀刺死楊姓同學,林姓少女則被認定涉教唆犯案,兩人分別遭判處12年、11年徒刑定讞。
民事求償部分,楊姓少年父母及姊姊請求撫養費、精神慰撫金等損害賠償,其中楊父求償723萬餘元、楊母求償662萬餘元、楊姊求償792萬餘元,合計求償2177萬餘元。不過雙方在審理期間因訴訟攻防發生激烈的言語交鋒,楊姓少年家屬請求撫養費,辯方則要求調查家屬財產狀況。
辯方律師林月雪要求清查死者楊承勳的家屬財產,甚至質疑楊家將500萬元愛心捐款捐作獎助學金是「故意轉移資產」,林月雪甚至在開庭後出言罵被害家屬律師李惠暄是「法律人之恥」。本月14日再次召開民事庭,林月雪仍質疑楊家透過捐款方式故意減少資產,並二度指責李惠暄是「法律人之恥」。
楊父也不滿表示,若賠償責任還須視被害人家屬財力而定,難道全國首富的孩子遭殺害,加害人就連一毛錢都不用賠?楊父也強調,這筆捐款是透過新北市府愛心大平台募集,家人從未想靠兒子的離世發財,因此將500萬元捐給清水高中設立獎助學金,希望幫助清寒學生,不要再有人走上歧途。
林月雪的爭議言行曝光後,也引發網友起底肉搜,她所屬的律師事務所遭網友改名為,並狂刷一星負評「來看法律人之恥」、「怎麼好意思罵人法律人之恥?要不要照照鏡子?」、「林大律師很敢講欸,超讚的啦,讓全國都知道什麼叫把受害者家屬往腳下踩呢」、「律師也要有良心,「捐款是故意減少資產」這話你也敢說?」、「請問善款抵扣加害者賠償款?新聞有寫錯嗎?」
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
法院將在未來數月內對民事損害賠償訴訟作出判決,可能調整被害家屬的求償金額。
Likely · Within months
律師公會或司法機關可能對林月雪的言行展開調查,以評估其是否違反律師倫理規範。
Possible · Within weeks

Prosecutor Liu from the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office was granted deferred prosecution because of his good attitude as a first-time drug offender. People's Party Chairman Huang Guochang criticized the prosecutor for covering up his scandal. Jianqing's reform statement countered, quoting Ko Wenzhe's quote "Treat drug addicts as patients, not prisoners", pointing out that deferred prosecution treatment requires medical treatment at one's own expense and regular urine tests. Violators will face revocation or imprisonment. He questioned Huang Guochang's remarks as stupid and ignorant or maliciously incited confrontation. He also emphasized that the policy has been implemented for more than 18 years, and the deferred prosecution rate for first-time offenders exceeds 70%.

The Xicheng District People's Court of Beijing released typical cases involving the protection of the rights and interests of the elderly and disclosed two fraud cases targeting the elderly: one involved health care fraud, in which the defendants Li and Yang attracted the elderly with free activities, health lectures, etc., and fabricated their medical conditions to induce them to buy products at high prices, defrauding 8 people of more than 170,000 yuan; the other was a collectibles fraud, in which the defendants Yue and Yang posed as intermediaries and buyers, charging traceability fees and other fees under the guise of high-priced repurchases, defrauding 6 people of more than 220,000 yuan. After the trial, the court held that the defendant's behavior constituted a crime of fraud, and sentenced nine people including Yang to fixed-term imprisonment of six months to four years and eight months. Yue and Yang were each sentenced to three years and nine months and fined 35,000 yuan. The defendant has fully refunded the compensation, and all the victims' economic losses have been recovered.

Prosecutor Liu Zhonglin of the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office was suspended from prosecution by the New Taipei District Prosecutor's Office for allegedly using the second-level drug amphetamine. During the period, he received addiction treatment for six months. This was the first case in the history of our country's judicial history that an active prosecutor was involved in drug abuse. When the Beijing Prosecutor's Office learned of the case, he made an inquiry, and Liu immediately resigned. He is currently on leave and suspended from his duties. The case letter was sent to the Prosecutor Evaluation Committee for individual case evaluation.

In 2022, a fire at the Meifu warehouse in Taoyuan lasted for 21 days, and Zhengxian Company filed a lawsuit for more than 43.86 million yuan in compensation because the goods were burned. The Taipei District Court held that the cause of the fire could not be confirmed, and there was no way to prove that it could be blamed on the manager. It ruled that Meifu Warehouse was exempt from compensation and the entire case could be appealed.

On the 15th, the Executive Yuan passed the draft amendments to some provisions of the Court Organization Law and related schedules drafted by the Judicial Yuan, and will be sent to the Legislative Yuan for review. This amendment aims to solve the huge caseload and manpower scheduling difficulties by adding the Judicial Affairs Office of the High Court, supervisors and assistant prosecutors of the High Prosecutor's Office, and integrating similar statutory posts to enhance the flexibility of manpower utilization.
According to the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the procuratorial organs prosecuted five officials including Yang Keqin, Zhu Xiaoqing, Wei Daiqing, Liu Yunzhou, and Ban Dairong in accordance with the law. The suspected crimes include accepting bribes, using influence to accept bribes, abuse of power, and corruption.