温州市中级人民法院公开宣判江西省政协原党组成员、副主席胡幼桃受贿案
2026年10月12日,浙江省温州市中级人民法院一审公开宣判江西省政协原副主席胡幼桃受贿案。胡幼桃以受贿罪被判处有期徒刑十三年,并处罚金人民币三百万元,其受贿所得财物及孳息依法上缴国库。
AI-generated summary
胡幼桃曾任江西省发展计划委员会副主任、省财政厅厅长、副省长及省政协副主席等职务。
2026年10月12日,浙江省温州市中级人民法院一审公开宣判江西省政协原党组成员、副主席胡幼桃受贿案,对被告人胡幼桃以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十三年,并处罚金人民币三百万元;对追缴在案的胡幼桃受贿所得财物及孳息依法上缴国库,不足部分继续追缴。
经审理查明:1997年至2025年,被告人胡幼桃利用担任江西省发展计划委员会副主任,省财政厅党组书记、厅长,省地税局党组书记,副省长,省政协副主席等职务上的便利,为有关单位和个人在工程承揽、企业经营、职务调整等事项上提供帮助,直接或者通过他人非法收受财物共计折合人民币4364万余元。
温州市中级人民法院认为,被告人胡幼桃的行为构成受贿罪。胡幼桃受贿数额特别巨大,应依法惩处。鉴于其受贿犯罪有未遂情节,到案后如实供述罪行,主动交代办案机关尚未掌握的部分受贿犯罪事实,认罪悔罪,积极退赃,受贿所得财物大部分已追缴到案,其中胡幼桃个人实际所得已全部追缴,具有法定、酌定从轻处罚情节,依法可对其从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。
据悉,温州市中级人民法院于2026年7月29日公开开庭审理了该案。庭审中,检察机关出示了相关证据,被告人胡幼桃及其辩护人进行了质证,控辩双方在法庭的主持下充分发表了意见,胡幼桃进行了最后陈述,并当庭表示认罪悔罪。人大代表、政协委员和各界群众30余人旁听了庭审。
Chu Zhongzhi, former member of the Standing Committee of the Dali Prefecture Committee and former secretary of the Dali Municipal Committee of Yunnan Province, is suspected of corruption, bribery, and abuse of power. The Chuxiong Prefecture People's Procuratorate of Yunnan Province has filed a public prosecution in the Chuxiong Prefecture Intermediate People's Court in accordance with the law. The case is under further processing.
Zhang Guokun, the former party secretary and chairman of Shanghai Modern Agriculture Investment and Development Group Co., Ltd., is suspected of bribery and abuse of power. The First Branch of the Shanghai Municipal People's Procuratorate has filed a public prosecution in Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court in accordance with the law.

Gao Xizhi, the father-in-law of the Popular Party Chairman Huang Guochang, was accused of seizing a state-owned academic base and owing rent. The Ministry of Education twice requested enforcement. The Taipei District Court found that Gao's signature and seal on the contract were obviously inconsistent with the real person. It ruled that the Ministry of Education's claims against Gao did not exist and revoked the enforcement order. The whole case is subject to appeal.

The mother of slain Hong Kong socialite Abby Choi Tin-fung denied in court that she was repeatedly in debt due to gambling, dismissing her former son-in-law's financial support claims as lies.

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin and Zhu Fumei did not participate in the deliberations for more than 300 days but issued separate legal opinions and authorized paid downloads. They were reported by the judicial circles. Senior judges and lawyers questioned him about confusing private comments with judicial opinions, abusing his position and official resources, and called on the Judicial Yuan to identify the source of authorized income and information.

The three justices of Taiwan's Constitutional Court, Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin and Zhu Fumei, did not participate in the substantive review of the "114-year Constitutional Court Judgment No. 1", but issued a dissenting legal opinion outside the system and authorized Fayuan Legal Network to obtain proceeds. The Constitutional Court responded that this was a private legal opinion outside the trial, triggering discussions in the legal community on judicial ethics and institutional norms.