AI-generated summary
Zhang Guokun once served as Secretary of the Party Committee of Liantang Town, Qingpu District, Shanghai, Director of the Shanghai Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee, and Chairman of Shanghai Modern Agriculture Investment and Development Group Co., Ltd.
China News Service, October 12. According to the official Weibo of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the case of Zhang Guokun, former Party Secretary and Chairman of Shanghai Modern Agriculture Investment and Development Group Co., Ltd., suspected of bribery and abuse of power, was concluded by the Shanghai Municipal Supervisory Committee and transferred to the procuratorial organ for review and prosecution. After being assigned by the Shanghai Municipal People's Procuratorate, the First Branch of the Shanghai Municipal People's Procuratorate initiated a public prosecution to the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court in accordance with the law. The case is under further processing.
During the review and prosecution stage, the procuratorial organ informed the defendant Zhang Guokun of his litigation rights in accordance with the law, interrogated the defendant in accordance with the law, and listened to the opinions of the defender. The First Branch of the Shanghai Municipal People's Procuratorate prosecuted and accused: The defendant Zhang Guokun took advantage of the convenience and the convenience created by his position as Secretary of the Party Committee of Liantang Town, Qingpu District, Shanghai, Director of the Shanghai Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee, Chairman of Shanghai Modern Agriculture Investment and Development Group Co., Ltd., to work directly or through other countries. The behavior of personnel in their duties is to provide assistance to others in matters such as project undertaking, company operation, project declaration and approval, and to illegally accept property from others in extremely huge amounts; to practice favoritism and abuse of power, resulting in heavy losses to public property. If the circumstances are particularly serious, criminal responsibility shall be investigated for the crime of accepting bribes and abusing power according to law.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court will hear Zhang Guokun's case
Very likely · Within months
On October 12, 2026, the Intermediate People's Court of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province publicly pronounced the first instance verdict on the bribery case against Hu Youtao, former vice chairman of the Jiangxi Provincial Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. Hu Youtao was sentenced to 13 years in prison and fined RMB 3 million for accepting bribes. The property and interest obtained from bribery were turned over to the state treasury in accordance with the law.
Chu Zhongzhi, former member of the Standing Committee of the Dali Prefecture Committee and former secretary of the Dali Municipal Committee of Yunnan Province, is suspected of corruption, bribery, and abuse of power. The Chuxiong Prefecture People's Procuratorate of Yunnan Province has filed a public prosecution in the Chuxiong Prefecture Intermediate People's Court in accordance with the law. The case is under further processing.

Gao Xizhi, the father-in-law of the Popular Party Chairman Huang Guochang, was accused of seizing a state-owned academic base and owing rent. The Ministry of Education twice requested enforcement. The Taipei District Court found that Gao's signature and seal on the contract were obviously inconsistent with the real person. It ruled that the Ministry of Education's claims against Gao did not exist and revoked the enforcement order. The whole case is subject to appeal.

The mother of slain Hong Kong socialite Abby Choi Tin-fung denied in court that she was repeatedly in debt due to gambling, dismissing her former son-in-law's financial support claims as lies.

Justices Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin and Zhu Fumei did not participate in the deliberations for more than 300 days but issued separate legal opinions and authorized paid downloads. They were reported by the judicial circles. Senior judges and lawyers questioned him about confusing private comments with judicial opinions, abusing his position and official resources, and called on the Judicial Yuan to identify the source of authorized income and information.

The three justices of Taiwan's Constitutional Court, Cai Zongzhen, Yang Huiqin and Zhu Fumei, did not participate in the substantive review of the "114-year Constitutional Court Judgment No. 1", but issued a dissenting legal opinion outside the system and authorized Fayuan Legal Network to obtain proceeds. The Constitutional Court responded that this was a private legal opinion outside the trial, triggering discussions in the legal community on judicial ethics and institutional norms.