
調查顯示偏鄉教師更重視待遇、工作環境與親師溝通,而非久任獎金與留任補助。文章指出,要解決偏鄉師資難留問題,需從「進得去、教得下、留得久」三方面建構支持制度,包括改善宿舍交通、減少行政負擔及連結職涯發展,而非單靠發放獎金。
AI-generated summary
偏鄉學校長期面臨教師難聘難留問題,交通不便、住宿條件有限,教師常需兼任行政與社區事務。現有政策多聚焦於久任獎金與留任補助,但調查顯示教師更關心待遇、工作環境與親師溝通。
◎ 陳清雲
偏鄉學校長期面臨教師難聘、難留問題。近日調查顯示,相較於久任獎金與留任補助,教師更在意待遇、工作環境及親師溝通。這提醒政府,偏鄉教育真正缺的,恐怕不只是一筆獎金,而是一套能讓教師安心留下來的制度。
有調查顯示,相較於久任獎金與留任補助,教師更在意待遇、工作環境及親師溝通;示意圖。(資料照)
偏鄉教師面對的困難與都會不同。部分學校交通不便、住宿條件有限,一名教師除了教學,還可能兼任行政,甚至處理招生與社區事務。如果政策只是加發獎金,鼓勵教師「再撐幾年」,補助期滿後問題依然存在,人自然還是留不住。
請繼續往下閱讀...
因此,偏鄉教育不能只想著多給一筆錢,應從「補助教師」走向「支持教師」,建立「進得去、教得下、留得久」的留才三道防線。
首先是「進得去」。除了提高職缺誘因,更應改善教師宿舍、提供交通補助及生活設施,降低年輕教師赴偏鄉的生活成本。偏遠地區如果連居住、往返都成問題,再高的教育熱忱也很難長久。
其次是「教得下」。偏鄉學校規模雖小,行政工作卻未減少。教育主管機關應增加行政支援人力,減少不必要的評鑑與表報作業,並建立親師爭議、法律諮詢等支援機制,不能讓教師在遇到爭議時仍得單打獨鬥。
更重要的是「留得久」。教師選擇偏鄉,不應等於犧牲職涯發展。可將偏鄉服務年資與進修、專業發展及調任制度合理連結,讓願意長期投入的教師看得到未來,而不是只能計算還要「撐幾年」。
政府多年來強調教育平權,但不能只看每所學校「有沒有老師」,更要看能不能「留住好老師」。教師頻繁更換,學生就得重新適應,最後承受代價的仍是偏鄉孩子。
與其不斷加碼留任獎金,不如把交通、住宿、行政減量與職涯發展一次補齊。當偏鄉教師不再只是「為獎金留下」,而是「因希望留下」,偏鄉教育才能真正走得長久。
台東縣府協助偏鄉修繕或改建教師宿舍,圖為大王國小宿舍。(資料照)
(作者為立法院法制局前局長)
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
若政府將偏鄉教師支持政策從單純發放獎金擴大至包含住宿、交通、行政減量與職涯發展,偏鄉學校教師留任率將在兩年內顯著提升。
Likely · Within years

At the same National Day conference, the speeches of President Lai Qingde and Legislative Yuan Han Guoyu presented completely different political patterns. Lai Qingde emphasized national security and international responsibilities, and the pattern was relatively complete; Han Kuo-yu criticized the government in his speech and deepened the confrontation, raising questions.

Political veteran Fan's suggestion to reduce Legco seats from 90 to 60 to cut costs sparks debate, though critics argue funding is secondary to public perception.
On October 10, a spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council responded to Lai Qingde’s “Double Ten” speech that day, accusing him of exaggerating the “mainland threat” and provoking cross-strait confrontation, and criticized his remarks for exposing the bad nature of “Taiwan independence”.

President Lai Ching-te turned to a more tactful but firm expression in this year's Double Ten speech, emphasizing that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country, calling on China to stop distorting international law and history, and presenting Taiwan's image as a responsible international partner. Japanese political scientist Ogasawara Yoshiyuki evaluated his National Day speech as a stable and successful one, and believed that it was related to the increase in support for the ruling party and the favorable situation in local elections.

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission released a report stating that China uses military-civilian fusion strategies to improve its detection, interference and control capabilities on trans-Pacific submarine cables. At the same time, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's new regulations require submarine cable terminal equipment to comply with national security interests, indicating that the competition between the two parties has shifted from a single cable break risk to a comprehensive competition for who can control the submarine cable.

Legislative President Han Kuo-yu questioned Executive President Zhuo Rongtai for not countersigning the law passed on the third reading of the Legislative Yuan, triggering a controversy over constitutional teaching; Kuomintang legislator Weng Xiaoling warned President Lai Qingde and the Executive Yuan that they would be spurned by the people if they did not abide by their constitutional obligations, and emphasized that constitutional provisions and political differences should be treated differently.