
Legislative President Han Kuo-yu questioned Executive President Zhuo Rongtai for not countersigning the law passed on the third reading of the Legislative Yuan, triggering a controversy over constitutional teaching; Kuomintang legislator Weng Xiaoling warned President Lai Qingde and the Executive Yuan that they would be spurned by the people if they did not abide by their constitutional obligations, and emphasized that constitutional provisions and political differences should be treated differently.
AI-generated summary
After the Legislative Yuan passes a law on third reading, the Constitution stipulates that the President’s promulgation of the law must be countersigned by the Executive Yuan. The failure of Executive President Zhuo Rongtai to countersign caused controversy. Legislative President Han Guoyu questioned the impact of this move on constitutional teaching. Kuomintang legislator Weng Xiaoling warned that those who do not abide by constitutional obligations will be spurned by the people.
◎ Zaimi
On National Day, Legislative Yuan Han Guoyu questioned: The Executive Yuan did not countersign the law passed on the third reading by the Legislative Yuan. How will constitutional teachers teach students in the future? On the same day, Kuomintang legislator Weng Xiaoling warned President Lai Qingde and Executive Yuan Zhuo Rongtai that if they do not unite with public opinion and the Legislative Yuan and abide by their constitutional obligations, they will eventually be spurned and overthrown by the people. Weng Xiaoling was an associate professor at Tsinghua University, and constitutional law was her academic specialty. For Han Guoyu’s question, you might as well ask Weng Xiaoling to answer it first.
Legislative Yuan Han Guoyu questioned how the Constitution teachers will teach students in the future because the Executive Yuan did not countersign the law passed on the third reading by the Legislative Yuan. (File photo) Article 37 of the Constitution stipulates that laws promulgated by the President must be countersigned by the Executive Yuan; Article 72 stipulates that after a law is passed, the President shall in principle promulgate it within the statutory period. Article 3 of the additional amendment stipulates that when the Executive Yuan proposes a review and the Legislative Yuan upholds the original case, the Executive Yuan shall accept it immediately. Counter-signature is only a formal requirement to publish the law, or does it include the substantive authority to refuse counter-signature? In particular, whether the countersignature can be refused after the review is rejected involves different interpretations of the constitution, and political accusations cannot be used to replace legal provisions and institutional arguments.
Weng Xiaoling asked the Executive Yuan and the Legislative Yuan to work together, but Article 2 of the Constitution clearly stipulates that sovereignty belongs to all citizens; Article 62 empowers the Legislative Yuan to exercise legislative power on behalf of the people, and does not allow the majority of Congress to monopolize public opinion. The president is directly elected by the people, and the Executive Yuan is responsible to the Legislative Yuan in accordance with the law.
Please read on...
If the executive and legislative opinions differ, whether it is unconstitutional still requires testing of specific actions and constitutional obligations.
The Constitution has a system of reconsideration and no-confidence motions to allow different authorities to handle conflicts in accordance with the law. Laws passed on third reading may still be subject to constitutional review; if the executive president refuses to countersign, he must also provide a constitutional basis for his authority. Neither the majority vote of Congress nor the exercise of executive power can be divorced from the Constitution.
Legislator Weng Xiaoling was an associate professor at Tsinghua University, and constitutional law was her academic specialty. For Han Guoyu’s question, you might as well ask Weng Xiaoling to answer it first. (File photo) Han Guoyu is worried about how constitutional teachers teach students. This controversy is a ready-made teaching material: the explicit text of the constitution, academic disputes and political party opinions should be clearly distinguished, and the statements of politicians cannot be regarded as standard answers.
Weng Xiaoling has a background in constitutional law teaching, so she should provide specific legal reasons for alleging violation of the constitution.
You can sing the national anthem on National Day, and you can also criticize those in power, but songs cannot replace the constitution, and political differences cannot directly be equated to violation of the constitution. Han Guoyu asked how to teach in the future, and the answer was actually very clear: respect the provisions first, explain the disputes, and then teach students to think independently.
(The author is a retired person)
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Constitutional Court will be asked to explain whether the Chief Executive has the authority to refuse countersignatures
Possible · Within months

Political veteran Fan's suggestion to reduce Legco seats from 90 to 60 to cut costs sparks debate, though critics argue funding is secondary to public perception.
On October 10, a spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council responded to Lai Qingde’s “Double Ten” speech that day, accusing him of exaggerating the “mainland threat” and provoking cross-strait confrontation, and criticized his remarks for exposing the bad nature of “Taiwan independence”.

President Lai Ching-te turned to a more tactful but firm expression in this year's Double Ten speech, emphasizing that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country, calling on China to stop distorting international law and history, and presenting Taiwan's image as a responsible international partner. Japanese political scientist Ogasawara Yoshiyuki evaluated his National Day speech as a stable and successful one, and believed that it was related to the increase in support for the ruling party and the favorable situation in local elections.

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission released a report stating that China uses military-civilian fusion strategies to improve its detection, interference and control capabilities on trans-Pacific submarine cables. At the same time, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's new regulations require submarine cable terminal equipment to comply with national security interests, indicating that the competition between the two parties has shifted from a single cable break risk to a comprehensive competition for who can control the submarine cable.

The survey shows that rural teachers pay more attention to salary, working environment and communication with teachers than long-term bonuses and retention subsidies. The article pointed out that to solve the problem of difficulty retaining teachers in rural areas, a support system needs to be established from three aspects: "access, teaching, and retention," including improving dormitory transportation, reducing administrative burdens, and linking career development, rather than relying solely on bonuses.

Taiwan's Sports Minister Li Yang promised to review the training plan with poor performance in the Asian Games, but the article pointed out that the Sports Department should go beyond grassroots training and proactively establish a communication mechanism between the central and local governments, refer to the experience of Australia and the Netherlands, take stock of local needs and guide policies, especially on the eve of local elections, when candidates have proposed specific sports policies, and the Sports Department should play the role of a locomotive for resource integration and policy guidance, rather than just focusing on performance review.